SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Another Offer We Cant Refuse

Créé par: OldNYIfan
Équipe: 2020-21 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 23 août 2020
Publié: 25 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The main trade is an outgrowth of a series of posts by Vancouver fans seeking to unload Eriksson's cap hit without paying their 2021 first. I've actually added a couple of pieces from the Anaheim side, including Vancouver home boy Deven Sideroff.

I'm assuming we have no success in signing Dylan De Melo or trading for MacKenzie Weegar.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Demko, Thatcher
  2. Eriksson, Loui (1 500 000 $ retained)
  3. Virtanen, Jake [Droits de RFA]
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
VAN
  1. Sideroff, Deven [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
2.
ANA
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (FLA)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Jones, Max
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de FLA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de VAN
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de FLA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $70 863 833 $0 $0 $10 636 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 août 2020 à 19 h 44
#1
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,844
Mentions "j'aime": 8,548
I mean you can...
25 août 2020 à 19 h 49
#2
Démarrer sujet
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,688
Mentions "j'aime": 24,611
Quoting: MaxDomi13
I mean you can...


I wouldn't. Virtanen and a guy Seattle would almost certainly prefer over any of the forwards or defenders we'd have to expose, plus the second . . .
25 août 2020 à 20 h 28
#3
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 33,202
Mentions "j'aime": 20,732
lets hypothetically say toronto offeres the 2020 15th OA pick what would the ducks send for it? just curious as if Dubas is looking to move it this is one of the teams he may talk to
25 août 2020 à 20 h 53
#4
Best In The World
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,272
Mentions "j'aime": 658
VAN decline
25 août 2020 à 22 h 47
#5
Démarrer sujet
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,688
Mentions "j'aime": 24,611
Quoting: brocklesnar
VAN decline


fool
25 août 2020 à 22 h 51
#6
Démarrer sujet
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,688
Mentions "j'aime": 24,611
Quoting: aadoyle
lets hypothetically say toronto offeres the 2020 15th OA pick what would the ducks send for it? just curious as if Dubas is looking to move it this is one of the teams he may talk to


Manson, of course

virtually any LW including Rakell, although I doubt Toronto is interested in Heinen or Des Lauriers

Guhle and Larsson, although I doubt Toronto is interested

maybe Antoine Morand or Benoit-Olivier Groulx

no 2020 draft pick

2021 second on down
26 août 2020 à 1 h 13
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
I can, Virtanen is massively overrated and isn't much of an upgrade over what we already have, especially long term with a bit of development from Steel/Terry/Comtois etc, and normally I'd say Demko is fine compensation, but you know, Gibby exists
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
26 août 2020 à 4 h 47
#8
Démarrer sujet
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,688
Mentions "j'aime": 24,611
Quoting: Dan10900
I can, Virtanen is massively overrated and isn't much of an upgrade over what we already have, especially long term with a bit of development from Steel/Terry/Comtois etc, and normally I'd say Demko is fine compensation, but you know, Gibby exists


Two words: "expansion draft"
26 août 2020 à 9 h 45
#9
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,844
Mentions "j'aime": 8,548
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I wouldn't. Virtanen and a guy Seattle would almost certainly prefer over any of the forwards or defenders we'd have to expose, plus the second . . .


I mean you can but you just dont want to wink
26 août 2020 à 9 h 58
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Two words: "expansion draft"


Which asset does that help us with, we're not gonna have to protect guys like Steel and Zegras, and tbh irdc if we have to lose a guy like Silf, I don't want to, but by that time the kids will have a few years of experience, and he probably won't really have a big role on the team anymore, so i don't think it's really worth trading for Demko just to expose him in the ED?
26 août 2020 à 12 h 49
#11
Démarrer sujet
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,688
Mentions "j'aime": 24,611
Quoting: Dan10900
Which asset does that help us with, we're not gonna have to protect guys like Steel and Zegras, and tbh irdc if we have to lose a guy like Silf, I don't want to, but by that time the kids will have a few years of experience, and he probably won't really have a big role on the team anymore, so i don't think it's really worth trading for Demko just to expose him in the ED?


"By that time"?!? One season after next? I don't think any of Henrique, Rakell or Silfverberg will be senile by then, and we have 6 young forwards (Heinen, Jones, Lundestrom, Milano, Steel and Terry) right now I think we'd like to keep (unless we're offered a deal like th second one in my construction). Similarly, assuming we'll still have Fowler, Lindholm and Manson, they will probably be on our protected list, leaving Djoos, Larsson, Mahura and Guhle exposed. And we're not "trading for Demko"; we're trading for Demko, Virtanen and the second in 2021, all at no cost. Given that last factor, I'm surprised you're so resistant to this idea. One can argue about the financial aspect or the burden of having Eriksson occupying a roster slot, but I find other "objections" chimerical.
26 août 2020 à 16 h 18
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 307
Mentions "j'aime": 64
Quoting: aadoyle
lets hypothetically say toronto offeres the 2020 15th OA pick what would the ducks send for it? just curious as if Dubas is looking to move it this is one of the teams he may talk to


I could see the ducks sending Manson and a someone like Jones or Goalie Prospect. But Leafs would have to dump some salary too. I know the Manson "regression" but he is a top 4 RHD dman that Leafs are looking for. Holl isnt the answer.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
27 août 2020 à 16 h 44
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 325
Mentions "j'aime": 129
We already have dead-weight in Backes and Perry's buyout hit, now we have to take on Eriksson too? The idea of spending $15 on those three next year depresses the hell out of me. We gain nothing we need out of this trade other than a backup goalie and that should be easy enough to accomplish with the many hitting the market in October (man that feels weird to type).

And from Vancouver's side they get practically nothing since Sideroff is a total bust and picks beyond the fifth round are basically useless.
27 août 2020 à 18 h 13
#14
Démarrer sujet
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,688
Mentions "j'aime": 24,611
Quoting: TheJoeMan
We already have dead-weight in Backes and Perry's buyout hit, now we have to take on Eriksson too? The idea of spending $15 on those three next year depresses the hell out of me. We gain nothing we need out of this trade other than a backup goalie and that should be easy enough to accomplish with the many hitting the market in October (man that feels weird to type).

And from Vancouver's side they get practically nothing since Sideroff is a total bust and picks beyond the fifth round are basically useless.



It's not that bad: we'd owe Backes and Eriksson each $2.5 million. Then after this (next) season, Backes drops off and we'd only owe Perry $2 million and Eriksson $2.5 million. In exchange, my thinking goes, we get to keep all of our young skaters through the expansion draft and we have Virtanen as long as we want him, plus the second-round draft pick.

Vancouver gets much-needed cap relief, so they would be more than happy with this deal. This allows them to re-sign Pettersson and Hughes without strain in 2021 and keep Markstrom and Toffoli this year if they want to (and Tanev and Stecher, or sign their replacements).
28 août 2020 à 11 h 26
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 325
Mentions "j'aime": 129
Quoting: OldNYIfan
It's not that bad: we'd owe Backes and Eriksson each $2.5 million. Then after this (next) season, Backes drops off and we'd only owe Perry $2 million and Eriksson $2.5 million. In exchange, my thinking goes, we get to keep all of our young skaters through the expansion draft and we have Virtanen as long as we want him, plus the second-round draft pick.

Vancouver gets much-needed cap relief, so they would be more than happy with this deal. This allows them to re-sign Pettersson and Hughes without strain in 2021 and keep Markstrom and Toffoli this year if they want to (and Tanev and Stecher, or sign their replacements).


But do we really need Virtanen? His presence just crowds the ranks with the slew of homegrown young forwards we have whom we're trying to develop into solid contributors. Plus he has arbitration rights which I'm sure Murray isn't keen about. I'd welcome Demko but I can't fathom why Vancouver would want to part with him before they get their starting goalie problem fix first. I get that they desperately need cap space and Eriksson is clearly someone they'd like to get rid of but this just seems like a lot to give up to simply unload his contract. And besides, I feel like Murray executed his one "Hey, I'll take that bloated contract off your hands for a sweet asset" move in acquiring Backes. There's only so many of those guys I can tolerate sitting in the press box.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
28 août 2020 à 13 h 17
#16
Démarrer sujet
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,688
Mentions "j'aime": 24,611
Quoting: TheJoeMan
But do we really need Virtanen? His presence just crowds the ranks with the slew of homegrown young forwards we have whom we're trying to develop into solid contributors. Plus he has arbitration rights which I'm sure Murray isn't keen about. I'd welcome Demko but I can't fathom why Vancouver would want to part with him before they get their starting goalie problem fix first. I get that they desperately need cap space and Eriksson is clearly someone they'd like to get rid of but this just seems like a lot to give up to simply unload his contract. And besides, I feel like Murray executed his one "Hey, I'll take that bloated contract off your hands for a sweet asset" move in acquiring Backes. There's only so many of those guys I can tolerate sitting in the press box.


All very valid points.
TheJoeMan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage