SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Future of Chicago

Créé par: Wadejos123
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 20 août 2020
Publié: 20 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Ranked in terms of their potential. Not including anyone over the age of 24 or who I don't think is in the long term plans. The future on defense looks great however I'm not sure I se any of those guys becoming true #1's. Biggest issues would be at RW and goalie. And yes, I'm speculating on our draft pick. Jarvis might not even be there for the hawks at #17, but if he is we 100% need to take him
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
1925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
14 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
14 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Jarvis, Seth
3925 000 $
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2681 500 000 $35 949 106 $452 439 $5 630 000 $45 550 894 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Jarvis, Seth
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
866 667 $866 667 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
853 333 $853 333 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 août 2020 à 9 h 44
#1
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,313
Mentions "j'aime": 2,075
Jarvis or Mercer will be nice
20 août 2020 à 9 h 48
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,532
Mentions "j'aime": 9,572
The ages of all the goalies are 25+. I understand the 24 wasn't a hard limit, but I'm just highlighting that we need to draft a couple of goalies in the later rounds in 2020. I'd also put Nalimov at the top of the list. KHL > AHL.

We'll see on the defense. It's not that I disagree with you at all...it's just that guys become #1's by getting in pressure packed moments and getting NHL ice time. It's a delicate balance. Taking away the past week...I think they're doing the right thing with Boqvist. He's got his instruction for next year. Go lift wisely, but like crazy. Add some muscle. Go learn UFC fighting with Shaw or something.

As for the RW. This is a real issue. I know Kane isn't going anywhere, but we need more than this...even IF we do get Jarvis. If not Jarvis, I like Noel Gunler or Rodin Amirov.
20 août 2020 à 9 h 49
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,182
Mentions "j'aime": 4,786
Quoting: exo2769
The ages of all the goalies are 25+. I understand the 24 wasn't a hard limit, but I'm just highlighting that we need to draft a couple of goalies in the later rounds in 2020. I'd also put Nalimov at the top of the list. KHL > AHL.

We'll see on the defense. It's not that I disagree with you at all...it's just that guys become #1's by getting in pressure packed moments and getting NHL ice time. It's a delicate balance. Taking away the past week...I think they're doing the right thing with Boqvist. He's got his instruction for next year. Go lift wisely, but like crazy. Add some muscle. Go learn UFC fighting with Shaw or something.

As for the RW. This is a real issue. I know Kane isn't going anywhere, but we need more than this...even IF we do get Jarvis. If not Jarvis, I like Noel Gunler.


agreed. And yeah I had to break by 24 years old rule for the goalies. truly shows how thin we are there
20 août 2020 à 9 h 53
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: Beetlejuice
Jarvis or Mercer will be nice


Will either be there at 17 or whatever it is though?

Lets be honest, those are two of the best skaters in the draft. Both are Righties too. I imagine they jump up the board gone between 10-15. I could see the penguins choosing either one.
Beetlejuice a aimé ceci.
20 août 2020 à 10 h 16
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,182
Mentions "j'aime": 4,786
Quoting: pharrow
Will either be there at 17 or whatever it is though?

Lets be honest, those are two of the best skaters in the draft. Both are Righties too. I imagine they jump up the board gone between 10-15. I could see the penguins choosing either one.


There's definitely a good chance they're both gone. Especially Jarvis. Might be a better shot mercer is there but who knows.
20 août 2020 à 13 h 0
#6
Roviet_Sussia
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 509
Mentions "j'aime": 118
Kalynuk should be top of the LD list, and Teply above Kurashev.
20 août 2020 à 13 h 14
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,182
Mentions "j'aime": 4,786
Quoting: Roviet_Sussia
Kalynuk should be top of the LD list, and Teply above Kurashev.


You're crazy. Kalynuk is our top D prospect in your mind? Over Boqvist, Mitchell, Beaudan, Regula, and Vlasic? No way
20 août 2020 à 16 h 38
#8
Roviet_Sussia
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 509
Mentions "j'aime": 118
Quoting: Wadejos123
You're crazy. Kalynuk is our top D prospect in your mind? Over Boqvist, Mitchell, Beaudan, Regula, and Vlasic? No way


I said LD, not RD. Have you watched Kalynuk and followed his progress at Wisconsin? He's essentially a left-sided Mitchell. Almost head and shoulders above Beaudin.
20 août 2020 à 17 h 46
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,182
Mentions "j'aime": 4,786
Quoting: Roviet_Sussia
I said LD, not RD. Have you watched Kalynuk and followed his progress at Wisconsin? He's essentially a left-sided Mitchell. Almost head and shoulders above Beaudin.


I hope you're right but I'm gonna say Beaudan ends up being better. The jury is still out on Vlasic though
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage