SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Realistic maybe idk

Créé par: WallStreet83
Équipe: 2020-21 Stars de Dallas
Date de création initiale: 15 août 2020
Publié: 15 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3825 000 $
21 100 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 600 000 $
32 850 000 $
2850 000 $
1850 000 $
43 200 000 $
54 130 000 $
33 300 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1825 000 $
2825 000 $
13 000 000 $
1950 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
DAL
  1. Montour, Brandon [Droits de RFA]
3.
4.
DAL
  1. Athanasiou, Andreas [Droits de RFA]
  2. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Liste de réserve]
EDM
  1. Comeau, Blake
  2. Honka, Julius [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (DAL)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (DAL)
Détails additionnels:
At the draft
5.
DAL
  1. Roy, Jérémy [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de BUF
2021
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
2022
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 774 532 $3 047 866 $2 602 500 $-274 532 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 850 000 $9 850 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Stars de Dallas
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
3 300 000 $3 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Stars de Dallas
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 137 500 $2 137 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
4 130 000 $4 130 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
RFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
771 666 $771 666 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
737 500 $737 500 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 août 2020 à 0 h 49
#1
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,927
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Yeah I would probably do that canucks trade. I would rather have Roussel but shaving off the extra year is really nice
15 août 2020 à 0 h 50
#2
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Don't see the point in acquiring Roussel. We need the money of expiring Cogliano to re-sign Heiskanen.

Also acquiring Puljujärvi only to play 4th line seems like a waste.
15 août 2020 à 0 h 58
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,679
Mentions "j'aime": 696
Interesting
15 août 2020 à 1 h 27
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,806
Mentions "j'aime": 220
Edmonton takes that deal then squeals with glee like a little girl as soon as you leave the room.
15 août 2020 à 3 h 22
#5
Nick
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,582
Mentions "j'aime": 819
MTL should decline that IMO, I think we are better off keeping Drouin and playing him with KK next year (they have chemistry) then acquire a LD. If we acquire a LD, it has to be a PP quarterback that can play big minutes. We have Romanov coming up next season and we have a good mix of LD prospects. With the emergence of Kulak, Chiarot and Kulak can play top 4 until Romanov is ready, then Chiarot would likely go to Seattle. This deal would make sense if we re-signed Tatar and Domi long term, Caufield is top 6 ready in 2021-22. MB likes Lindell as a partner for Weber or Petry, Drouin loses his chemistry with KK and Brook/Juulsen beats Fleury on the depth chart.
15 août 2020 à 8 h 12
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Is the trade for Roy a roster size issue? As a Sharks fan, he’ll never play an NHL game, so y’all should pass on him.
15 août 2020 à 9 h 15
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,430
Mentions "j'aime": 6,387
Only way I send Drouin and Fleury to Dallas at this point is for Harley Plus. We need a young guy that doesn't need protection from the ED and can play top 4 minutes. I assume if MB is still in charge he is protecting Weber, Kulak and Chiarot and will have a deal in place to resign Petry after the ED and before FA. That will leave Mete unprotected and likely to be selected.
15 août 2020 à 10 h 30
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,155
Mentions "j'aime": 4,640
Quoting: icehawk2006
Is the trade for Roy a roster size issue? As a Sharks fan, he’ll never play an NHL game, so y’all should pass on him.


Highly disagree Roy is a solid D guy who has a confidence issue after getting hurt 2 years in a row, he’s 21 but his progression is closer to 18 due to the missed years! Give him 1-2 years in the AHL and he will be a strong 4-6 D-Man
15 août 2020 à 11 h 13
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Tufte and Roy seem like equally nothing so sure I guess
15 août 2020 à 12 h 0
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 484
Mentions "j'aime": 372
Quoting: justaBoss
Don't see the point in acquiring Roussel. We need the money of expiring Cogliano to re-sign Heiskanen.

Also acquiring Puljujärvi only to play 4th line seems like a waste.


I wanted Roussel back for the physical play and character. Plus he played well while he was here. I guess I'm just sore that he left in FA. Puljujarvi wouldn't be playing strictly 4th I just had him there to start.
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
15 août 2020 à 12 h 1
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 484
Mentions "j'aime": 372
Quoting: icehawk2006
Is the trade for Roy a roster size issue? As a Sharks fan, he’ll never play an NHL game, so y’all should pass on him.


I wanted to trade for Roy because Texas doesn't have enough RD.
icehawk2006 a aimé ceci.
11 sept. 2020 à 13 h 23
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Highly disagree Roy is a solid D guy who has a confidence issue after getting hurt 2 years in a row, he’s 21 but his progression is closer to 18 due to the missed years! Give him 1-2 years in the AHL and he will be a strong 4-6 D-Man


You can highly disagree all you want and still be very very very wrong. He wont see regular NHL time.
11 sept. 2020 à 21 h 7
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,155
Mentions "j'aime": 4,640
Quoting: icehawk2006
You can highly disagree all you want and still be very very very wrong. He wont see regular NHL time.


If he was 26 I’d agree but at 21 he has potential still
14 sept. 2020 à 11 h 41
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
If he was 26 I’d agree but at 21 he has potential still


that's not how this works. he didnt have a lot of potential in the first place
14 sept. 2020 à 23 h 42
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,155
Mentions "j'aime": 4,640
Quoting: icehawk2006
that's not how this works. he didnt have a lot of potential in the first place


We drafted him at 31 overall so he did have a lot of potential, 2 injuries derailed his development, last year he was finally healthy this year is a show me year.
7 oct. 2020 à 17 h 22
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
We drafted him at 31 overall so he did have a lot of potential, 2 injuries derailed his development, last year he was finally healthy this year is a show me year.


Hey Rob! Guess what?! The Sharks didn’t even qualify Roy on a min contract. This is me rubbing it in your face. Are you going to disagree now... because you’re an idiot.
7 oct. 2020 à 17 h 51
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,155
Mentions "j'aime": 4,640
He did have a lot of potential before back to back knee injuries, For you to disagree makes you an idiot! Dumb ass!!!
I think the sharks have soured on him but I would bet money he plays at least 25 games in the NHL for another team.
https://www.eliteprospects.com/player/151150/jeremy-roy

They compared him to Duncan Keith but yea your right hardly any potential. Jack ass.
10 oct. 2020 à 2 h 33
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,155
Mentions "j'aime": 4,640
Modifié 10 oct. 2020 à 2 h 40
Quoting: icehawk2006
Lolololol. You can’t even take an L! He has zero potential, so much so the Sharks didn’t even qualify him! He’s not even worth trying to keep around in an area the Sharks are weak at in the prospect pool apart from Merkley. Thanks for linking a totally irrelevant link. Comparisons are made, but that doesn’t remotely mean that person has near the capability or potential to meet that capability. They make comparisons with 7th round picks to current NHL players, and 7th round players have less than a .01% of making the NHL. It’s hilarious that you don’t know that comparisons mean absolutely nothing in terms of potential and the folks making those comparison regularly say so. Lololololol. Picks 25-35 have less than a 5% of making the NHL. So yes! Huuuuuuge potential. You’re a complete dumb****.

Dude. You’ve been dunked on. Put your head down in shame and walk away like any other sane person.


Act like an ass all you want the sharks traded a lot to move up and draft him!

Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
The Sharks traded up to draft Roy 31st overall in 2015. To acquire the pick, the Sharks sent the No. 39 selection in 2015, their second round pick in 2016 and their sixth rounder in 2017 to the Avalanche. Those picks turned into winger A.J. Greer, Cameron Morrison and Denis Smirnov.

he HAD a lot of potential.
And where the hell do you get your stats dumb ass?
I do research when I argue! Makes me not sound like a dumb ass

https://guelphstorm.com/odds-not-great-for-nhl-draft-picks

“63% of first round picks played but less than 25% of second round picks survived and only 12% of third rounder selections. Former NHL general manager Doug MacLean said his math over the last decade showed that only 15% of second round picks ever become impact players.”

Those are real stats. Again I’ve given proof and reasonable examples to prove my point and you post bull and lies and act like you won and destroyed me.
So next time provide truth Trump! Otherwise I’ll mop the floor with you you pathetic excuse of a hockey fan!

And that my friend was TOP SHELF GLOVE HAND FOR THE win! You know a hockey reference for a hockey forum.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage