SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

incentive for both sides thoughts

Créé par: BuckoJoyde
Publié: 14 août 2020 à 15 h 18
Plafond salarial: 81 500 000 $
Journées à la saison: 41/186 (22%)
Détermination du registraire central: Cette transaction a rempli les différents critères exigés par le registraire central de la LNH.

Logo de Ducks d'AnaheimDucks d'Anaheim

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Manson, JoshDucks d'AnaheimLNH-903 763 $111---50189--
Comtois, MaximeExempté du ballottageDucks d'AnaheimMineures-0 $011---295611--
Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (Logo de Bruins de BostonBOS)---100------
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Nylander, WilliamMaple Leafs de TorontoLNH-1 534 715 $111---68302959--
Liljegren, TimothyExempté du ballottageMaple Leafs de TorontoMineures-0 $011---11011--
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial2 151 710 $2148634611
Variation-630 952 $000-100
Final1 520 758 $ (↓)2148633 (↓)611241640

Logo de Maple Leafs de TorontoMaple Leafs de Toronto

La transaction a eu lieu alors que la LTIR est utilisée
Allègement provenant de la liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR): 14 875 000 $
Portion de la LTIR utilisée avant la transaction: 14 782 706 $
DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Nylander, WilliamMaple Leafs de TorontoLNH-6 962 366 $111---68302959--
Liljegren, TimothyExempté du ballottageMaple Leafs de TorontoMineures-0 $011---11011--
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Manson, JoshDucks d'AnaheimLNH-4 100 000 $111---50189--
Comtois, MaximeExempté du ballottageDucks d'AnaheimMineures-0 $011---295611--
Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (Logo de Bruins de BostonBOS)---100------
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial92 294 $2548642517
Variation2 862 366 $000100
Final2 954 660 $ (↑)2548643 (↑)517-24-160
14 août 2020 à 15 h 35
#1
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 4,055
Mentions "j'aime": 2,084
This is like my pitch from last week except it doesn't fix Tor's cap problem at all. I'm biased against any Nylander deal because it doesn't solve any issues
14 août 2020 à 15 h 42
#2
Démarrer sujet
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
@reelkena of course I think its not the saving grace of the Leafs issues, but its a short term solution. But, how does this still not help the leafs in anyway? Btw I forgot to add retention on Manson.
14 août 2020 à 16 h 21
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 3,314
Mentions "j'aime": 1,780
Quoting: reelkena
This is like my pitch from last week except it doesn't fix Tor's cap problem at all. I'm biased against any Nylander deal because it doesn't solve any issues


Agreed but it would be a start. Add someone like Kap and get a decent pic or prospect back
14 août 2020 à 16 h 22
#4
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 4,055
Mentions "j'aime": 2,084
Quoting: BuckoJoyde
@reelkena of course I think its not the saving grace of the Leafs issues, but its a short term solution. But, how does this still not help the leafs in anyway? Btw I forgot to add retention on Manson.


Without retention it was 3 million of about a 10 million need and it removed the option of trading more skill forwards. They still have to replace Willy with this deal also.
14 août 2020 à 16 h 25
#5
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 4,055
Mentions "j'aime": 2,084
My trade from last week was Marner and Johnsson for Rakell, Manson and Comtois.

Johnsson is replaceable with a depth player and Rakell swaps for Marner. Tor gets the D man while also saving 4 million. The extra million and the Rakell contract allows for more leeway with the forwards.

Also I think my deal is more enticing for Anaheim as Marner and keeping their 1st are big gains for them.
14 août 2020 à 16 h 42
#6
Démarrer sujet
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
@reelkena I agree Marner would be great but wo retention we are gonna pass. He won't be 90pt players on the ducks. Not to mention, one trade will never fix a teams issues especially with ANA and TOR.

@Rhea Kap is great but we can't afford to give away the appropriate prospects and picks to get his services. If this trade were to occur.
14 août 2020 à 16 h 50
#7
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 4,055
Mentions "j'aime": 2,084
Quoting: BuckoJoyde
@reelkena I agree Marner would be great but wo retention we are gonna pass. He won't be 90pt players on the ducks. Not to mention, one trade will never fix a teams issues especially with ANA and TOR.

@Rhea Kap is great but we can't afford to give away the appropriate prospects and picks to get his services. If this trade were to occur.


We disagree on Marner. Obviously. I don't think the money is a problem in Anaheim either.
Rhea a aimé ceci.
14 août 2020 à 17 h 24
#8
Démarrer sujet
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
@reelkena money is gonna be a problem everywhere with the flat cap and paying over 10 million for a winger is always tough. But, yes Anaheim has a good cap situation all things considered.

But, you disagree on Marner scoring over 90 pts in Anaheim or having Toronto retain?
14 août 2020 à 18 h 21
#9
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 4,055
Mentions "j'aime": 2,084
Quoting: BuckoJoyde
@reelkena money is gonna be a problem everywhere with the flat cap and paying over 10 million for a winger is always tough. But, yes Anaheim has a good cap situation all things considered.

But, you disagree on Marner scoring over 90 pts in Anaheim or having Toronto retain?


80+ points is achievable consistently. hitting 90 is semantics, he'll be a stud.

Obviously Toronto is never retaining a penny. No conversation even continues after that word is mentioned to Dubas.
14 août 2020 à 19 h 11
#10
Démarrer sujet
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
@reelkena I think you'd be surprised.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage