SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trade I saw earlier leafs side

Créé par: Stones6160
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 13 août 2020
Publié: 13 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
24 000 000 $
12 900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 100 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Murphy, Connor
  2. Strome, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
In my opinion. I’d be surprised if Chicago does this, because of Murphy. But who knows. Dermott would probably slot in in 2D, Nylander would be on the Nylander line
CHI
  1. Dermott, Travis [Droits de RFA]
  2. Nylander, William
Détails additionnels:
Strome would likely soot in at 3C, shoving Kerfoot out to 3LW or RW, and or Kerfoot is in this Package, which is likely the case because of cap reasons, or he’s moved somewhere else like the jets or minny
Murphy has been on Leafs fans target list for a while. And would be what Morgan Reilly needs.

The 1st would be interesting. But if Braden Schneider survives the pick of Florida. They should take him, seems to be a TWD on Brandon, if not Justin Barron, if his injury problems go away
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (OTT)
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de OTT
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 821 584 $0 $0 $-321 584 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
737 500 $737 500 $
AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 août 2020 à 21 h 39
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,519
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Hawks decline. Whoever suggested this does not speak for us.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
13 août 2020 à 21 h 42
#2
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,314
Mentions "j'aime": 2,077
Quoting: Petrock83
Hawks decline. Whoever suggested this does not speak for us.


I posted this trade where I found it off a leafs fan twitter and I said Chi Rejects
13 août 2020 à 21 h 43
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,519
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: Beetlejuice
I posted this trade where I found it off a leafs fan twitter and I said Chi Rejects


Ok cool, Leafs twitter is not with it then
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
13 août 2020 à 21 h 57
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: Petrock83
Hawks decline. Whoever suggested this does not speak for us.


The Hawks win this deal in a landslide. Strome is not worth much, Murphy is really good but he's not anything close to Nylander in value, same with the 1st. The best asset is Nylander by a wide margin then the 1st, then Murphy then Dermott.
13 août 2020 à 22 h 5
#5
Démarrer sujet
Brad Boyes please Wq
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,496
Mentions "j'aime": 714
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
The Hawks win this deal in a landslide. Strome is not worth much, Murphy is really good but he's not anything close to Nylander in value, same with the 1st. The best asset is Nylander by a wide margin then the 1st, then Murphy then Dermott.


A, Hawks are a semi rebuilding team, they would probably want to keep the pick
B, Murphy is the hawks Best RHD, unless Boqvist makes a good leap he’s there best RHD,
And Chicago doesn’t need a another forward,
13 août 2020 à 22 h 8
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: DavidAyers
A, Hawks are a semi rebuilding team, they would probably want to keep the pick
B, Murphy is the hawks Best RHD, unless Boqvist makes a good leap he’s there best RHD,
And Chicago doesn’t need a another forward,


Yeah and a 24 year old elite offensive player definitely doesn't help a team at all. On any other team Nylander would be worth a pile of assets but of course because he's on TO he is worth a bunch od middling assets or secondary assets. Quality over quantity is something people on here say all the time and then **** is posted.
13 août 2020 à 22 h 9
#7
Démarrer sujet
Brad Boyes please Wq
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,496
Mentions "j'aime": 714
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Yeah and a 24 year old elite offensive player definitely doesn't help a team at all. On any other team Nylander would be worth a pile of assets but of course because he's on TO he is worth a bunch od middling assets or secondary assets. Quality over quantity is something people on here say all the time and then **** is posted.


Not my post btw
13 août 2020 à 22 h 11
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: DavidAyers
Not my post btw


I know, but it's just the common crap on here.
13 août 2020 à 22 h 12
#9
Démarrer sujet
Brad Boyes please Wq
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,496
Mentions "j'aime": 714
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
I know, but it's just the common crap on here.


Media....
13 août 2020 à 22 h 29
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
The Hawks win this deal in a landslide. Strome is not worth much, Murphy is really good but he's not anything close to Nylander in value, same with the 1st. The best asset is Nylander by a wide margin then the 1st, then Murphy then Dermott.




Strome, Murphy and a 3rd for Nylander is even on paper. Dermott is useless to the Hawks, he'd be a 3rd pairing and blocking the development of Carlsson, Beaudin in Vlasic in another year or two.

"Strome is not worth much" LMAO...Strome is a huge upgrade to Kerfoot and also can slot into the 2C as needed and allow JT to jump up on the LW in certain situations during a game. Kerfoot can't hold Strome's jockstrap and yet Strome at 23 years old is younger, cost controlled and on a 3 year bridge slightly costing slightly more then Kerfoot and an RFA at 26 years old. Strome is worth a 1st and decent prospect in the free market, Kerfoot is not worth more then a 3rd round pick comparably...so yes, Strome IS worth something.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage