Forums/Armchair-GM

Calgary Fans Would You Make This Deal

Créé par: OldNYIfan
Date de création initiale: aoû 10, 2020
Publié: 10 aoû à 17 h 10
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Explications
The premise here is that Toronto is moving on from Andersen and has a replacement for him.

Am I correct in understanding that Calgary probably won't make a qualifying offer to Mark Jankowski?

Note that this leaves $7 million to shore up the right side (offense and defense) with 5 players (3 and 2).
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
Mangiapane, Andrew22 850 000 $
Kylington, Oliver2950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
Czarnik, Austin1800 000 $
Transactions
CGY
  1. Andersen, Frederik
TOR
  1. Ruzicka, Adam
  2. 2020 2e round pick (CGY)
  3. 2021 5e round pick (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
  • Troy Brouwer: 1 500 000 $
  • Michael Stone: 1 166 667 $
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2020
CGY
EDM
SJS
CGY
CGY
CGY
2021
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
2022
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS BONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1881 500 000 $74 189 166 $0 $457 500 $7 310 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
CGY
Tkachuk, Matthew
7 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
CGY
Monahan, Sean
6 375 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 3
CGY
Lindholm, Elias
4 850 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 4
CGY
Gaudreau, Johnny
6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
CGY
Backlund, Mikael
5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
CGY
Bennett, Sam
2 550 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
CGY
Mangiapane, Andrew
2 850 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
CGY
Ryan, Derek
3 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
CGY
Czarnik, Austin
800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
CGY
Lucic, Milan
5 250 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 3
CGY
Dubé, Dillon
778 333 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
CGY
Giordano, Mark
6 750 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
CGY
Andersson, Rasmus
4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
TOR
Andersen, Frederik
5 000 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 1
CGY
Hanifin, Noah
4 950 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
CGY
Rittich, David
2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
CGY
Kylington, Oliver
950 000 $
DG
RFA
CGY
Välimäki, Juuso
894 166 $
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 aoû à 17 h 18
#1
Rejoint: jun 2019
Messages: 10,475
Mentions "j'aime": 4,275
He was pretty mediocre this year so no, we need to restock our cupboards
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 17 h 22
#2
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 194
Mentions "j'aime": 59
No.

Not a value issue. Just would rather spend money or assets elsewhere. I think the Flames can get a cheaper option FA to partner with DR.

They may even just sign Talbot.

Talbot / Ritich at 5-6 million is better cap management for the Flames than Freddy and Dave at 7.75 million. Would let us improve other areas.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 17 h 37
#3
Démarrer sujet
First NY Then LA
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 14,089
Mentions "j'aime": 6,479
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
He was pretty mediocre this year so no, we need to restock our cupboards


Quoting: SAS
No.

Not a value issue. Just would rather spend money or assets elsewhere. I think the Flames can get a cheaper option FA to partner with DR.

They may even just sign Talbot.

Talbot / Rittich at 5-6 million is better cap management for the Flames than Freddy and Dave at 7.75 million. Would let us improve other areas.


Thanks for the input, guys.
10 aoû à 19 h 10
#4
jcambers
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 282
Mentions "j'aime": 36
I would - especially if that were the price. CGY's defense (at least defensively) is much better than TOR and wouldn't demand as much Freddy. Plus with a b/up like Rittich, the starts would be lessened.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 19 h 14
#5
Démarrer sujet
First NY Then LA
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 14,089
Mentions "j'aime": 6,479
Quoting: jcambers
I would - especially if that were the price. CGY's defense (at least defensively) is much better than TOR and wouldn't demand as much Freddy. Plus with a b/up like Rittich, the starts would be lessened.


I have a high opinion of @Ledge_And_Dairy 's input (don't know @SAS ), but this seems like a clear improvement over Talbot and Rittich and the price is right. Plus it leaves about $3.5 million in the tank to get a #2 RD.
10 aoû à 19 h 21
#6
Yeah Baby
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 1,368
Mentions "j'aime": 322
I might do it, but need to flip Rittich. Don't want a $2.75 million back up if we've traded for a genuine starter.

Also, an extension needs to be inked the minute the trade is finalized, and for no more than $5.5-6.0million AAV.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 19 h 25
#7
Démarrer sujet
First NY Then LA
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 14,089
Mentions "j'aime": 6,479
Quoting: BurnEmUp
I might do it, but need to flip Rittich. Don't want a $2.75 million back up if we've traded for a genuine starter.

Also, an extension needs to be inked the minute the trade is finalized, and for no more than $5.5-6.0 million AAV.


I think that's exactly where Andersen is.
10 aoû à 19 h 26
#8
Rejoint: jun 2019
Messages: 10,475
Mentions "j'aime": 4,275
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I have a high opinion of @Ledge_And_Dairy 's input, but this seems like a clear improvement over Talbot and Rittich and the price is right. Plus it leaves about $3.5 million in the tank to get a #2 RD.


Dont get me wrong, I have nothing against Andersen. But at the same time I feel like Talbot as proven he more than capable if hes not overworked. I also think if Calgary is trying to acquire a goalie there are better options this off season than a 1 year rental that wont ost assets.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
11 aoû à 13 h 27
#9
Calgary GM v4
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 2,345
Mentions "j'aime": 1,052
I would have to say NO to that offer.
Main reason is Andersen only has 1yr remaining and then would need to be resigned at a cap hit above his already $5M, so he becomes quite costly in a flat cap world.
I think the only way this would be considered is the Leafs would have to take back some cap money.

Next, Ruzicka is spoke of quite highly and "might" even make the big club out of camp next year. He could easily fill the spot left by Rinaldo or Rieder not coming back.
That's where in my mind the Flames would say no to him being included.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
11 aoû à 13 h 39
#10
Démarrer sujet
First NY Then LA
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 14,089
Mentions "j'aime": 6,479
Quoting: flamesfan419
I would have to say NO to that offer.
Main reason is Andersen only has 1yr remaining and then would need to be resigned at a cap hit above his already $5M, so he becomes quite costly in a flat cap world.
I think the only way this would be considered is the Leafs would have to take back some cap money.

Next, Ruzicka is spoke of quite highly and "might" even make the big club out of camp next year. He could easily fill the spot left by Rinaldo or Rieder not coming back.
That's where in my mind the Flames would say no to him being included.


Thanks for the input!
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage