Forums/Armchair-GM

Best Dman Prospects around the league

Créé par: GMs
Date de création initiale: aoû 10, 2020
Publié: 10 aoû à 1 h 52
Équipe: 2019-20 Équipe du client
Explications
Who did I forgot ?
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS BONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1481 500 000 $12 703 334 $0 $2 262 500 $68 796 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
COL
Byram, Bowen
925 000 $
DG
RFA - 4
NYI
Dobson, Noah
894 167 $
DD
RFA - 3
TOR
Sandin, Rasmus
894 167 $
DG
RFA - 3
DET
Seider, Moritz
925 000 $
DD
RFA - 4
MTL
Romanov, Alexander
894 167 $
DG
RFA - 3
CHI
Boqvist, Adam
894 167 $
DD
RFA - 3
WPG
Heinola, Ville
925 000 $
DG
RFA - 4
ARI
Söderström, Victor
925 000 $
DD
RFA - 4
CGY
Välimäki, Juuso
894 166 $
DG
RFA - 2
OTT
Brännström, Erik
863 333 $
DD
RFA - 3
EDM
Broberg, Philip
925 000 $
DG
RFA - 4
EDM
Bouchard, Evan
894 167 $
DD
RFA - 4
Samberg, Dylan
925 000 $
Lundqvist, Nils
925 000 $

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 aoû à 1 h 58
#1
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 1,855
Mentions "j'aime": 608
Victor Soderstrom - Arizona

He may be the #1 overall D-prospect right now
10 aoû à 1 h 59
#2
Rejoint: oct 2019
Messages: 115
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Nils Lundkvist
Victor Söderström
biased Egor Zamula
10 aoû à 2 h 08
#3
Rejoint: mar 2018
Messages: 4,515
Mentions "j'aime": 943
Boqvist isn’t a prospect anymore. I would argue that neither is Dobson (even though he isn’t quite a regular either)
I would replace their spots with Perunovich and Söderström. Also replace broberg with Bouchard. If u are willing to add more, I would say Samberg (probably my bias), timmins, Broberg, merkley, and lundqvist and should all be added
GMs a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 2 h 09
#4
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 6,931
Mentions "j'aime": 2,605
wouldn't put Broberg in my top 20 probably
GMs a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 2 h 13
#5
Démarrer sujet
Rejoint: jui 2019
Messages: 8,420
Mentions "j'aime": 2,821
Quoting: Shifttee
Victor Soderstrom - Arizona

He may be the #1 overall D-prospect right now


Quoting: krzyk0
Nils Lundkvist
Victor Söderström
biased Egor Zamula


Quoting: arafay
Boqvist isn’t a prospect anymore. I would argue that neither is Dobson (even though he isn’t quite a regular either)
I would replace their spots with Perunovich and Söderström. Also replace broberg with Bouchard. If u are willing to add more, I would say Samberg (probably my bias), timmins, Broberg, merkley, and lundqvist and should all be added


Agree on Soderstrom Lundkvist Perunovich
Disagree on Zamula ( even if he had a good tournament WCJ-20 )

Maybe Boston prospect Vakaarainen ( not sure how to write it )
arafay a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 2 h 16
#6
Rejoint: mar 2018
Messages: 4,515
Mentions "j'aime": 943
Quoting: GMs
Agree on Soderstrom Lundkvist Perunovich
Disagree on Zamula ( even if he had a good tournament WCJ-20 )

Maybe Boston prospect Vakaarainen ( not sure how to write it )


I don’t think Vaalanainen has shown enough to be included here. He’s good, but not that good imo.

What about Bouchard? Imo if you include broberg, u have to include bouchard
GMs a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 2 h 17
#7
Démarrer sujet
Rejoint: jui 2019
Messages: 8,420
Mentions "j'aime": 2,821
Quoting: arafay
I don’t think Vaalanainen has shown enough to be included here. He’s good, but not that good imo.

What about Bouchard? Imo if you include briber, u have to include bouchard


That’s why I didn’t include him, thanks for the feedback tho
10 aoû à 2 h 17
#8
Caps fan idk why
Rejoint: déc 2016
Messages: 7,812
Mentions "j'aime": 2,774
Fehervary Alexeyev.
10 aoû à 2 h 17
#9
Démarrer sujet
Rejoint: jui 2019
Messages: 8,420
Mentions "j'aime": 2,821
Quoting: arafay
I don’t think Vaalanainen has shown enough to be included here. He’s good, but not that good imo.

What about Bouchard? Imo if you include broberg, u have to include bouchard


Already edited it, he’s there
arafay a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 2 h 18
#10
Démarrer sujet
Rejoint: jui 2019
Messages: 8,420
Mentions "j'aime": 2,821
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Fehervary Alexeyev.


Maybe Alexeyev, definitely not Fehervary
arafay a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 2 h 20
#11
Caps fan idk why
Rejoint: déc 2016
Messages: 7,812
Mentions "j'aime": 2,774
Quoting: GMs
Maybe Alexeyev, definitely not Fehervary


Educate yourself on both. Fehevary is very good. Looked better than a lot of guys on your list that have already played a short amount in the NHL. smile
10 aoû à 2 h 21
#12
Rejoint: mar 2018
Messages: 4,515
Mentions "j'aime": 943
Quoting: GMs
Already edited it, he’s there


Mb, sorry for the impatience! I was confused why u had Samberg and lunquvist as new players but then I remembered their deals don’t start until next year
GMs a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 2 h 22
#13
Rejoint: mar 2018
Messages: 4,515
Mentions "j'aime": 943
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Educate yourself on both. Fehevary is very good. Looked better than a lot of guys on your list that have already played a short amount in the NHL. smile


Alexeyev for sure, but I don’t see fehevary as being a better prospect. Sure, he is more nhl ready right now and all, but I think overall, the guys listed here are better prospects
GMs a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 2 h 27
#14
Caps fan idk why
Rejoint: déc 2016
Messages: 7,812
Mentions "j'aime": 2,774
Quoting: arafay
Alexeyev for sure, but I don’t see fehevary as being a better prospect. Sure, he is more nhl ready right now and all, but I think overall, the guys listed here are better prospects


I mean you can argue ceilings all you want but he can play in the NHL right now. Hard to ignore a guy who’s more NHL ready. Isn’t that the ultimate goal. Took Gudas spot on the current roster. People don’t know him bc he’s a 2nd round pick and not a house hold name yet.
GMs a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 2 h 28
#15
Démarrer sujet
Rejoint: jui 2019
Messages: 8,420
Mentions "j'aime": 2,821
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Educate yourself on both. Fehevary is very good. Looked better than a lot of guys on your list that have already played a short amount in the NHL. smile


Quoting: arafay
Alexeyev for sure, but I don’t see fehevary as being a better prospect. Sure, he is more nhl ready right now and all, but I think overall, the guys listed here are better prospects


Almost all those prospects have top2-3 potential, tell me honestly you think Fehevary have top2-3 potential
10 aoû à 2 h 30
#16
Démarrer sujet
Rejoint: jui 2019
Messages: 8,420
Mentions "j'aime": 2,821
Quoting: Capitalfail67
I mean you can argue ceilings all you want but he can play in the NHL right now. Hard to ignore a guy who’s more NHL ready. Isn’t that the ultimate goal. Took Gudas spot on the current roster. People don’t know him bc he’s a 2nd round pick and not a house hold name yet.


I’m going with the prospect with the highest ceiling
Fehevary Timmins Merkley Vakaarainen York etc aren’t there because I think they don’t have the same potential
10 aoû à 2 h 31
#17
Caps fan idk why
Rejoint: déc 2016
Messages: 7,812
Mentions "j'aime": 2,774
Quoting: GMs
Almost all those prospects have top2-3 potential, tell me honestly you think Fehevary have top2-3 potential


Absolutely! They had him paired with Carlson already this year and he looked great. You’re talking about “potential” this dude has already done it. Today he took Gudas spot played 15 minutes looked great. He’s only going to get better. Don’t be surprised when he’s in Washington’s top 4 in a year or 2.
10 aoû à 2 h 35
#18
Caps fan idk why
Rejoint: déc 2016
Messages: 7,812
Mentions "j'aime": 2,774
Quoting: GMs
I’m going with the prospect with the highest ceiling
Fehevary Timmins Merkley Vakaarainen York etc aren’t there because I think they don’t have the same potential


Idk it’s hard to ignore how well he’s done when called upon. He’s like a better defensive ORLOV imo.(not as good at zone entries of offensively) We’ll see. It’s a list of great prospects wouldn’t kill you to add a guy like him who’s shown he’s at least able to play in the NHL Guys like Marino are complete unknowns. Fehevary isn’t the same type as Mario but my point is all the same.

Edit:
Hugo Has is another capital d prospect I think is going to be amazing. He’s not signed yet idt but he’s solid
GMs a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 2 h 42
#19
Démarrer sujet
Rejoint: jui 2019
Messages: 8,420
Mentions "j'aime": 2,821
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Absolutely! They had him paired with Carlson already this year and he looked great. You’re talking about “potential” this dude has already done it. Today he took Gudas spot played 15 minutes looked great. He’s only going to get better. Don’t be surprised when he’s in Washington’s top 4 in a year or 2.


Victor Mete played with Weber at 19-20 yo top pairing and looked good. He’s still a #5 with top4 potential but he is far from having top pairing potential. Not because you looked good playing with an Elite player makes your ceiling go higher. Nothing against Fehevary, in my book he has more top4 potential than top pairing potential
10 aoû à 3 h 15
#20
Rejoint: jun 2015
Messages: 1,234
Mentions "j'aime": 122
I would add Jack Johnson. I know hes older but I think he is a sleeper/late bloomer. Pens waiting for him to finally get it all together.

Also Perunovich is an actual sleeper....
BluesBandit a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 6 h 50
#21
bhavikp27
Rejoint: jun 2016
Messages: 5,646
Mentions "j'aime": 2,026
Dobson, Boqvist, Sandin aren't prospects anymore. They're staying in the NHL.
Brannstrom/Valimaki 50/50. Wonder if you you could add Harley/Timmins.
GMs a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 8 h 21
#22
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 2,698
Mentions "j'aime": 1,058
Boqvist isn't a prospect swap him for Ian Mitchell
10 aoû à 10 h 32
#23
Caps fan idk why
Rejoint: déc 2016
Messages: 7,812
Mentions "j'aime": 2,774
Quoting: GMs
Victor Mete played with Weber at 19-20 yo top pairing and looked good. He’s still a #5 with top4 potential but he is far from having top pairing potential. Not because you looked good playing with an Elite player makes your ceiling go higher. Nothing against Fehevary, in my book he has more top4 potential than top pairing potential


Eh little different. Weber is good In both end Carlson is .... he’s really good at offense. He is below average at defense. Either way I understand your point.
GMs a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 10 h 33
#24
Rejoint: mar 2017
Messages: 10,278
Mentions "j'aime": 2,720
Quoting: Dan10900
wouldn't put Broberg in my top 20 probably


Why not?
GMs a aimé ceci.
10 aoû à 10 h 40
#25
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 6,931
Mentions "j'aime": 2,605
Quoting: CD282
Why not?


he's a great athlete, but just isn't good when going against other guys that he can't just skate around, in the SHL he was a turnover machine and struggled to get the puck out of his own zone (badly), especially under pressure he really struggled, also is not a very good positional guy, and when you put all that together you get a guy who struggles defensively, and isn't good enough offensively to anchor your best puck moving DFD with to help him get out of his own end, but that's probably why he impressed during the TC practices bc he took advantage of his physical gifts while nobody else was at 100%, then got absolutely caved in during the exhibition game thing, like seriously couldn't get a puck out of his own end (sorry for rambling, I'm not really good at explaining stuff lol)
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage