SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trade with Sharks

Créé par: XBestOneYetX
Équipe: 2020-21 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 5 août 2020
Publié: 5 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
13 750 000 $
22 750 000 $
24 250 000 $
11 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 200 000 $
Transactions
NYR
  1. Labanc, Kevin [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (COL)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de NYR
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $81 158 133 $0 $8 362 500 $341 867 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 2
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
G
UFA - 1
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
DG/DD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 août 2020 à 19 h 11
#1
Log off the internet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 7,830
Mentions "j'aime": 3,865
I have a feeling Deangelo won’t be going to a place as liberal as the Bay Area. I realize I’m probably exaggerating that aspect a ton but whatever. Also the Sharks don’t really need him anyway, they have Karlsson and Burns
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
5 août 2020 à 19 h 14
#2
Démarrer sujet
Brooks hates Shatty
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 254
Mentions "j'aime": 56
Rumor is they are shopping Burns and LaBanc. If they move Burns they definitely will have room for ADA, even if he doesn't end up going to the Sharks, I'd look to move ADA while his value is highest. Plus we have Trouba making 8 million, Fox will get a huge raise in 2 years and Lundkvist on the way all righties.
5 août 2020 à 19 h 22
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
DeAngelo is good, and the value here is actually pretty decent in my opinion, but as a Shark fan, I don’t want to see him on my team. I can’t imagine the sort of locker room tensions would rise with this guy and someone like Evander. And I just think he’s a bad person. But personal feelings aside, this doesn’t really make too much sense imo. San Jose already has Karlsson who doesn’t play defense and will eventually have Merkley make his way up who also doesn’t play defense. Even if we do get rid of Burns, I’m not too keen on overpaying a guy who just had a career year who will inevitably fall off stat-wise. I’d rather sign Vatanen or DeMelo in FA, who are better all around players than trade for DeAngelo.
Hedman77 et JumboFett a aimé ceci.
5 août 2020 à 19 h 32
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: Hedman77
I have a feeling Deangelo won’t be going to a place as liberal as the Bay Area.


Phew. Thank god! Lol
5 août 2020 à 19 h 34
#5
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
OOOOOOF that’s bad

@Sagecoll
@Shesterkin_next_GOAT
5 août 2020 à 19 h 54
#6
Log off the internet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 7,830
Mentions "j'aime": 3,865
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
DeAngelo is good, and the value here is actually pretty decent in my opinion, but as a Shark fan, I don’t want to see him on my team. I can’t imagine the sort of locker room tensions would rise with this guy and someone like Evander. And I just think he’s a bad person. But personal feelings aside, this doesn’t really make too much sense imo. San Jose already has Karlsson who doesn’t play defense and will eventually have Merkley make his way up who also doesn’t play defense. Even if we do get rid of Burns, I’m not too keen on overpaying a guy who just had a career year who will inevitably fall off stat-wise. I’d rather sign Vatanen or DeMelo in FA, who are better all around players than trade for DeAngelo.


I don't like Evander Kane. I'm not going to say I hate him, but I don't like him at all. But there's zero chance the Sharks would put him and Deangelo in the same locker room.
5 août 2020 à 20 h 17
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: Hedman77
I don't like Evander Kane. I'm not going to say I hate him, but I don't like him at all. But there's zero chance the Sharks would put him and Deangelo in the same locker room.


Exactly my thought.
5 août 2020 à 20 h 31
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
OOOOOOF that’s bad

@Sagecoll
@Shesterkin_next_GOAT


lol
5 août 2020 à 20 h 57
#9
Démarrer sujet
Brooks hates Shatty
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 254
Mentions "j'aime": 56
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
OOOOOOF that’s bad

@Sagecoll
@Shesterkin_next_GOAT


After seeing your post about how you are "90% sure the Rangers beat the Canes if there was no stoppage in play," not sure you are in any position to say anything is bad. Rangers had no chance in the first two games and with our best game yesterday they still got crushed, but yeah okay we could have beat them, sure!
Hedman77 a aimé ceci.
5 août 2020 à 20 h 58
#10
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Quoting: XBestOneYetX
After seeing your post about how you are "90% sure the Rangers beat the Canes if there was no stoppage in play," not sure you are in any position to say anything is bad. Rangers had no chance in the first two games and with our best game yesterday they still got crushed, but yeah okay we could have beat them, sure!


Dude 90% of the plays went in our favor at the end of the year haha I’m not saying we should’ve won, but playoff hockey being playoff hockey, I’m pretty sure we beat you.
5 août 2020 à 21 h 17
#11
Log off the internet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 7,830
Mentions "j'aime": 3,865
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
Dude 90% of the plays went in our favor at the end of the year haha I’m not saying we should’ve won, but playoff hockey being playoff hockey, I’m pretty sure we beat you.


the goals in the series were 15-4 dude. just give it up.
5 août 2020 à 21 h 22
#12
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Quoting: Hedman77
the goals in the series were 15-4 dude. just give it up.


No right, if we remove 100% of any momentum involved, we get beaten BAD and that's what happened.

But, at the time of the break we had the hottest goalie in the league, the hottest goal scorer in the league and even our depth pieces were playing above their head
6 août 2020 à 5 h 33
#13
Démarrer sujet
Brooks hates Shatty
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 254
Mentions "j'aime": 56
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
Dude 90% of the plays went in our favor at the end of the year haha I’m not saying we should’ve won, but playoff hockey being playoff hockey, I’m pretty sure we beat you.


First off, I am a Rangers fan... not sure who this "you" is that you are referring to. I would love to know which series you were watching, the Rangers had some chances they did not finish Howden, Mika, Smith missing an open net and Chtyil being robbed, and yes Hank let in some softies, but other than 2 good periods in the 3rd game, the Rangers were massively outplayed. They couldn't gain entry into the Canes zone which led to dumping and chasing (which we could never get the puck), Quinn opted to change the lines that he stuck with for 40 plus games after the first game (which set this team back even worse), Power Play looked reminiscent of the Torts era where just setting up in the offensive zone was an accomplishment, had an AHL caliber 4th line and our big guns were non-existent. Rangers were not even in this series. Reminded me a lot of Rangers Devils 2006 series where Rangers got swept with a young inexperienced team.
6 août 2020 à 7 h 2
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 509
Mentions "j'aime": 126
Quoting: XBestOneYetX
After seeing your post about how you are "90% sure the Rangers beat the Canes if there was no stoppage in play," not sure you are in any position to say anything is bad. Rangers had no chance in the first two games and with our best game yesterday they still got crushed, but yeah okay we could have beat them, sure!


that wouldn't make your trade any better buddy
6 août 2020 à 9 h 2
#15
Démarrer sujet
Brooks hates Shatty
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 254
Mentions "j'aime": 56
Quoting: Shesterkin_next_GOAT
that wouldn't make your trade any better buddy


If you think we will get more than a middle 6 player and a 2nd round pick for DeAngelo (due a huge payday)... keep overvaluing Rangers players, especially one who is disliked around the league, has been suspended for abusing officials and would be on his 4th team by age 24. Labanc had a bad year on the Sharks, as did most Shark players, have you even watched him play? Having a 3rd line that can actually create offense was the key to the Rangers making a 2014 Cup run, this is a 2 line team currently, barely that, with no sure fire forward prospects even close to making the team (Barron maybe?). Please feel free to enlighten me to the haul you think we will get for ADA and Lias who is a throw in that will never play for the Rangers again.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage