SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Seth Jones

Créé par: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 4 août 2020
Publié: 5 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Does this trade make Toronto a better team if CBJ accepted?

Some guys would need to be moved out in 2 years in order to re-sign Rielly and Jones as well as Sandin and Kapanen.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
42 800 000 $
2725 000 $
32 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2725 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $79 393 450 $0 $0 $2 106 550 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 août 2020 à 21 h 23
#26
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: leafs101
RHD's are way more valuable than wingers from a positional standpoint, that's why. There are countless high end wingers, but only a handful of high end RHD's. Basic supply and demand applying to hockey's trade market. Then there's also the perspective that defensemen make a larger impact on the game than wingers.


Okay but one guy is signed for 5 more years and the other guy is signed for 2 more years before potentially walking.
5 août 2020 à 21 h 24
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,202
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Okay but one guy is signed for 5 more years and the other guy is signed for 2 more years before potentially walking.


one guy is a bit overpaid and one is a lot underpaid.
5 août 2020 à 21 h 55
#28
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Jah1722
Werenski beat the “traffic” and was free when he let the puck roll off his stick.


Seth Jones was out of position! He was laying on his stomach below the dots. How in the hell can you possibly believe lying on your stomach deep in the offensive zone is good defensive positioning while your partner is rushing?

I’m not going to argue with you anymore but c’mon man. Jones was practicing his breast stroke in no man’s land. Even if werenski gets the shot on net unless he scores it’s going on a B-way the other way because there was NO ONE, not one single bluejacket thinking about covering.
Leafs_and_Sens_Fan a aimé ceci.
5 août 2020 à 22 h 25
#29
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: Jamiepo
Seth Jones was out of position! He was laying on his stomach below the dots. How in the hell can you possibly believe lying on your stomach deep in the offensive zone is good defensive positioning while your partner is rushing?

I’m not going to argue with you anymore but c’mon man. Jones was practicing his breast stroke in no man’s land. Even if werenski gets the shot on net unless he scores it’s going on a B-way the other way because there was NO ONE, not one single bluejacket thinking about covering.


Yeah that was a very bad play. But it's not like Marner doesn't make his fair share of bad plays too.
GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
5 août 2020 à 22 h 54
#30
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,417
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: Jamiepo
Seth Jones was out of position! He was laying on his stomach below the dots. How in the hell can you possibly believe lying on your stomach deep in the offensive zone is good defensive positioning while your partner is rushing?

I’m not going to argue with you anymore but c’mon man. Jones was practicing his breast stroke in no man’s land. Even if werenski gets the shot on net unless he scores it’s going on a B-way the other way because there was NO ONE, not one single bluejacket thinking about covering.


It’s also not a good play to be free of “traffic” with no one between you and Andersen and have the puck go towards the blue line.
5 août 2020 à 22 h 57
#31
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Jah1722
It’s also not a good play to be free of “traffic” with no one between you and Andersen and have the puck go towards the blue line.


He lost the handle it’s not like he didn’t just make a big move. So is that the leafs key to success? Every time someone fans on a puck mid handles or misses the net we just go the other way and score?
5 août 2020 à 22 h 58
#32
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Yeah that was a very bad play. But it's not like Marner doesn't make his fair share of bad plays too.


No doubt. They’re both human and even the best players make bad reads or clumsy mistakes.

... just don’t ever accuse jones of being human on cap friendly.
5 août 2020 à 23 h 11
#33
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,417
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: Jamiepo
He lost the handle it’s not like he didn’t just make a big move. So is that the leafs key to success? Every time someone fans on a puck mid handles or misses the net we just go the other way and score?


Just watched it again make sure I saw what I did. Jones is 4th guy into zone making it a 4 on 3. 2 Leafs follow Jenner below the dots while Werenski picks up the puck with Jones trailing him and Foudy to his right. Foudy is wide open for a one timer and Jones best his check up the middle. So once again I ask how is it not Werenski’s fault for not getting a puck on net but Jones’ for creating an odd man rush?
5 août 2020 à 23 h 18
#34
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Jah1722
Just watched it again make sure I saw what I did. Jones is 4th guy into zone making it a 4 on 3. 2 Leafs follow Jenner below the dots while Werenski picks up the puck with Jones trailing him and Foudy to his right. Foudy is wide open for a one timer and Jones best his check up the middle. So once again I ask how is it not Werenski’s fault for not getting a puck on net but Jones’ for creating an odd man rush?


Because werenski is rushing the puck and jones, believe it or not is his “DEFENSE” partner. I get that they are given the green light to rush together at times but this one bit them in the ass.

Werenski is rushing the puck, he needs to be covered up. There was a player coming in with jones slightly trailing him but I can’t remember who. One of the two needs to realize that there are three guys below the dots and making it 4 then 5 and completely forgetting about defence is well, stupid.

Just as much blame on the last forward coming in but jones is a Dman. He picked a bad time to pinch. If he didn’t Tavares doesn’t score.
5 août 2020 à 23 h 23
#35
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,417
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: Jamiepo
Because werenski is rushing the puck and jones, believe it or not is his “DEFENSE” partner. I get that they are given the green light to rush together at times but this one bit them in the ass.

Werenski is rushing the puck, he needs to be covered up. There was a player coming in with jones slightly trailing him but I can’t remember who. One of the two needs to realize that there are three guys below the dots and making it 4 then 5 and completely forgetting about defence is well, stupid.

Just as much blame on the last forward coming in but jones is a Dman. He picked a bad time to pinch. If he didn’t Tavares doesn’t score.


The result makes it a bad time to pinch because Werenski made a bad play. If he moves the puck to Foudy they get a grade A scoring chance. If he drops it to Jones, he’s got a couple feet on the back checker, they get a grade A chance. If Werenski gets his shot off they get a grade A chance. Instead JT gets a breakaway.
5 août 2020 à 23 h 38
#36
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Jah1722
The result makes it a bad time to pinch because Werenski made a bad play. If he moves the puck to Foudy they get a grade A scoring chance. If he drops it to Jones, he’s got a couple feet on the back checker, they get a grade A chance. If Werenski gets his shot off they get a grade A chance. Instead JT gets a breakaway.


Grade A chances aside, 5 guys playing winger means you better bury it or it’s going in your net.

Werenski made a mistake, he looked like he got off balance a bit or maybe got loose with the puck when he looked up. That stuff happens all the time.

Jones made a poor decision. Werenski can miss or make that shot and the result might have still been the same, even a pass for a one timer. If Andersen saves it there is atleast a 50/50 chance the leafs recover it.

The bottom line is 5 guys were below the dots all looking at the leafs net. Jones made a poor decision to pinch. Had he shoulder checked on the way in he would have noticed it and maybe held back. Hockey 101: when your partner rushes you make sure he’s covered.

You could tell jones knew he ****ed up as soon as the puck went the other way. Hence the desperate turn directly into a leafs player that sent him sprawling.
5 août 2020 à 23 h 44
#37
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: Jamiepo
Grade A chances aside, 5 guys playing winger means you better bury it or it’s going in your net.

Werenski made a mistake, he looked like he got off balance a bit or maybe got loose with the puck when he looked up. That stuff happens all the time.

Jones made a poor decision. Werenski can miss or make that shot and the result might have still been the same, even a pass for a one timer. If Andersen saves it there is atleast a 50/50 chance the leafs recover it.

The bottom line is 5 guys were below the dots all looking at the leafs net. Jones made a poor decision to pinch. Had he shoulder checked on the way in he would have noticed it and maybe held back. Hockey 101: when your partner rushes you make sure he’s covered.

You could tell jones knew he ****ed up as soon as the puck went the other way. Hence the desperate turn directly into a leafs player that sent him sprawling.


Yep. You should never have 2 guys pinching at the same time unless your down a goal with 30 seconds to play.
5 août 2020 à 23 h 49
#38
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,417
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: Jamiepo
Grade A chances aside, 5 guys playing winger means you better bury it or it’s going in your net.

Werenski made a mistake, he looked like he got off balance a bit or maybe got loose with the puck when he looked up. That stuff happens all the time.

Jones made a poor decision. Werenski can miss or make that shot and the result might have still been the same, even a pass for a one timer. If Andersen saves it there is atleast a 50/50 chance the leafs recover it.

The bottom line is 5 guys were below the dots all looking at the leafs net. Jones made a poor decision to pinch. Had he shoulder checked on the way in he would have noticed it and maybe held back. Hockey 101: when your partner rushes you make sure he’s covered.

You could tell jones knew he ****ed up as soon as the puck went the other way. Hence the desperate turn directly into a leafs player that sent him sprawling.


But if Werenski makes the play there and CBJ scores you’re not saying anything about any one other than the 2 TML that follow Jenner below the goal line turning a 4 on 3 into a 3 on 1.
6 août 2020 à 0 h 16
#39
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: Jah1722
But if Werenski makes the play there and CBJ scores you’re not saying anything about any one other than the 2 TML that follow Jenner below the goal line turning a 4 on 3 into a 3 on 1.


Dont know why you're arguing this. Even great players make bad plays...

That was clearly a bad play... it led to a goal.
GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
6 août 2020 à 0 h 42
#40
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,417
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Dont know why you're arguing this. Even great players make bad plays...

That was clearly a bad play... it led to a goal.


I didn’t even quote jaimepo. I quoted palhal. And it never would have led to a goal if Werenski creates a shot. Which has been my point the whole time.
6 août 2020 à 0 h 43
#41
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Jah1722
But if Werenski makes the play there and CBJ scores you’re not saying anything about any one other than the 2 TML that follow Jenner below the goal line turning a 4 on 3 into a 3 on 1.


If werenski makes a better play and if cbj scores.... if if if. They didn’t. They got caught with their pants down.

How about if they score a goal but jones doesn’t pinch so if they don’t score they keep it a one goal game.
6 août 2020 à 0 h 45
#42
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Jah1722
I didn’t even quote jaimepo. I quoted palhal. And it never would have led to a goal if Werenski creates a shot. Which has been my point the whole time.

He shoots, andersen saves, goes to a leafs player and Tavares still goes on a Bway.

The only way your scenario works out is if the puck ends up in the net to hide the mistake of 5 guys down low completely blowing all defensive responsibilities.
6 août 2020 à 0 h 55
#43
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: Jah1722
I didn’t even quote jaimepo. I quoted palhal. And it never would have led to a goal if Werenski creates a shot. Which has been my point the whole time.


If Andersen doesn't freeze the shot there's a good chance the Leafs get the puck and get a breakaway anyways.

Either way that's obviously not part of the CBJs system. Torts was furious.
6 août 2020 à 0 h 58
#44
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,417
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
If Andersen doesn't freeze the shot there's a good chance the Leafs get the puck and get a breakaway anyways.

Either way that's obviously not part of the CBJs system. Torts was furious.


There’s zero chance of a breakaway if the shot is on net. Werenski would be on top of Andersen by the time he tried to move it.

And it is part of CBJs system. Jones and Werenski play below the dots a ton.
6 août 2020 à 1 h 1
#45
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,417
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: Jamiepo
He shoots, andersen saves, goes to a leafs player and Tavares still goes on a Bway.

The only way your scenario works out is if the puck ends up in the net to hide the mistake of 5 guys down low completely blowing all defensive responsibilities.


If the shot is on net there zero chance Andersen plays the puck. Werenski would be on top of him before he could move it.
6 août 2020 à 1 h 1
#46
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: Jah1722
There’s zero chance of a breakaway if the shot is on net. Werenski would be on top of Andersen by the time he tried to move it.

And it is part of CBJs system. Jones and Werenski play below the dots a ton.


You're not supposed to have both D below the dots at the same time ever lol.
6 août 2020 à 1 h 2
#47
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: Jah1722
If the shot is on net there zero chance Andersen plays the puck. Werenski would be on top of him before he could move it.


I'm not saying he catches it and throws it out. If it bounces off his pads and goes away from the net it's all Leafs players around him.
6 août 2020 à 1 h 4
#48
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,417
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
You're not supposed to have both D below the dots at the same time ever lol.


You’re also not supposed to have 2 guys below the same face off dot covering 1 guy but TML had that on the same play. It’s a mini 3 on 1 when Werenski picks up the puck. He didn’t get a shot off and instead mishandled the puck towards the blue line. That’s an awful play.
6 août 2020 à 1 h 6
#49
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,417
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
I'm not saying he catches it and throws it out. If it bounces off his pads and goes away from the net it's all Leafs players around him.


It’s actually not. The reason Jones ends up on his stomach is because when he turns to retreat there’s a leaf there. Jones has position on his back checker and Werenski has no one between him and Andersen. The only defender still in the play when Werenski gets the puck dives at Werenski and Foudy crashes the net too.
6 août 2020 à 1 h 7
#50
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: Jah1722
You’re also not supposed to have 2 guys below the same face off dot covering 1 guy but TML had that on the same play. It’s a mini 3 on 1 when Werenski picks up the puck. He didn’t get a shot off and instead mishandled the puck towards the blue line. That’s an awful play.


What was Jones doing though? From where he is he's not getting a rebound... he's literally doing nothing where he is.

Nobody said the Leafs had good defense lol. They make a tonne of mistakes... What's that got to do with Seth Jones?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage