SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

Trading Hank Opinions COL and NYR Fans

Créé par: UnBiased
Équipe: 2019-20 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 5 août 2020
Publié: 5 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
NYR
  1. Jost, Tyson
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (COL)
COL
  1. Andersson, Lias
  2. Lundqvist, Henrik
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de CAR
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de COL
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de NYR
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $65 611 466 $0 $9 045 000 $15 888 534 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
885 833 $885 833 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
DG/DD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 août 2020 à 14 h 9
#1
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Please explain why Hank to COL keeps coming up?
COL has a strong goalie tandem costing them 5.3 mil next year and they are contending for a cup.
Why on earth are they going to take on a 8.5mil cap dump ?

Not to mention the rest of the trade isnt close.
Jost >> Andersson
2nd >>>> 5th

NYR literally gets the better player and the better pick and the cap dump?
UnBiased , JeffW et Foppa21 a aimé ceci.
5 août 2020 à 14 h 10
#2
Démarrer sujet
UnBiased
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 122
Mentions "j'aime": 8
True, I really didn't think about this one 😅
5 août 2020 à 14 h 18
#3
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Quoting: UnBiased
True, I really didn't think about this one 😅


and it kinda shows (no offense).
Cap Friendly probably needs to implement a certain "like" threshold.
x number of likes in order to create a thread.
It would clean up a ton of these troll posts and low effort AGMs
5 août 2020 à 14 h 33
#4
Démarrer sujet
UnBiased
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 122
Mentions "j'aime": 8
It wasn't meant to be like this, I just didn't think about Hank's contract. Maybe I should've added something from NY's side.
5 août 2020 à 14 h 42
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: McRanteskog
Please explain why Hank to COL keeps coming up?
COL has a strong goalie tandem costing them 5.3 mil next year and they are contending for a cup.
Why on earth are they going to take on a 8.5mil cap dump ?


Gonna presume it's because Hank outperformed both Colorado goalies this season so he'd be an upgrade:

lundqvist-col

But agreed, it doesn't make much now that Francouz is signed. And pretty much any Hank trade would have retained salary.
UnBiased a aimé ceci.
5 août 2020 à 14 h 53
#6
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Quoting: Sagecoll
Gonna presume it's because Hank outperformed both Colorado goalies this season so he'd be an upgrade:

lundqvist-col

But agreed, it doesn't make much now that Francouz is signed. And pretty much any Hank trade would have retained salary.


What are you smoking?
You ARE more clueless then you seem.

Lundqvist 30gp / .905 sv% / 3.16 GAA 10W-12L-3OT
Grubauer 36gp / .916 sv% / 2.63 GAA 18W-12L-4OT
Francouz 34gp / .923 sv% / 2.41 GAA 21W-7L-4OT

Lundqvist put up a weaker save %, GAA and W/L ratio. Not to mention they make 3.33mil and 950k compared to Hanks 8.5mil.
Very funny how your "advanced stats" are missing the key ones (ie. sv % and GAA), you dont even understand the numbers you are copying and pasting LOL
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
5 août 2020 à 15 h 33
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: McRanteskog
What are you smoking?
You ARE more clueless then you seem.

Lundqvist 30gp / .905 sv% / 3.16 GAA 10W-12L-3OT
Grubauer 36gp / .916 sv% / 2.63 GAA 18W-12L-4OT
Francouz 34gp / .923 sv% / 2.41 GAA 21W-7L-4OT

Lundqvist put up a weaker save %, GAA and W/L ratio. Not to mention they make 3.33mil and 950k compared to Hanks 8.5mil.
Very funny how your "advanced stats" are missing the key ones (ie. sv % and GAA), you dont even understand the numbers you are copying and pasting LOL



.... ooof this kinda idiocy is the stuff that gets you added to the ignore list.

The reason for these numbers is that they account for shot quality. Sv% and GAA treats all shots as equal, but obviously you're aware that not all shots are equal. Hence why most analysts use Goals Saved Above Expected as the foundation for evaluating goaltenders. It's the best way to measure a goalie relative to the defense in front of them . If you're wondering why Henrik's figure is superior to Colorado's goaltending, that's why.

Not sure why you're quoting team stats though. You seem like the sort of person who'd prefer Brodeur over Hasek lol.
5 août 2020 à 15 h 45
#8
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Quoting: Sagecoll
.... ooof this kinda idiocy is the stuff that gets you added to the ignore list.

The reason for these numbers is that they account for shot quality. Sv% and GAA treats all shots as equal, but obviously you're aware that not all shots are equal. Hence why most analysts use Goals Saved Above Expected as the foundation for evaluating goaltenders. It's the best way to measure a goalie relative to the defense in front of them . If you're wondering why Henrik's figure is superior to Colorado's goaltending, that's why.

Not sure why you're quoting team stats though. You seem like the sort of person who'd prefer Brodeur over Hasek lol.


Ladies and Gents, weve got another one.
So lost in the sauce of all these advanced numbers that they miss the glaring ones right infront of their eyes.
Listen, there are 30 other NHL teams with scouts and analytics guys, let me know how many of them are running to NYR to pickup the godly netminder who is Lundqvist.

You seem to be the type of guy to say that St Louis wasnt the best team last year because their Fenwick and Corsi wasnt superior to their opponent lol
5 août 2020 à 15 h 53
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: McRanteskog
Ladies and Gents, weve got another one.
So lost in the sauce of all these advanced numbers that they miss the glaring ones right infront of their eyes.
Listen, there are 30 other NHL teams with scouts and analytics guys, let me know how many of them are running to NYR to pickup the godly netminder who is Lundqvist.

You seem to be the type of guy to say that St Louis wasnt the best team last year because their Fenwick and Corsi wasnt superior to their opponent lol


Trying to say that "not all shots are the same" and "hey maybe a point blank save is more impressive than a save on an unscreened shot from the point" is lost in the sauce?

It's like you don't watch the games,,,,, lol
5 août 2020 à 16 h 11
#10
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Quoting: Sagecoll
Trying to say that "not all shots are the same" and "hey maybe a point blank save is more impressive than a save on an unscreened shot from the point" is lost in the sauce?

It's like you don't watch the games,,,,, lol


The fact that you are trying to argue that Lundqvist had a better statistical year than Francouz or Grubauer confirms you need to put down the calculator and watch the games
5 août 2020 à 16 h 19
#11
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,576
Mentions "j'aime": 4,615
No from Colorado. Very easy no.
UnBiased a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage