SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kids Have Arrived

Créé par: Skytown
Équipe: 2020-21 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 4 août 2020
Publié: 4 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The Kings have an embarrassment of riches in their prospect pool, and plenty of money coming off the books in the coming few years. $10 million in cap being paid to Phaneuf and Kovalchuk this season, which drops to just over $1 million in 2021-22. Brown and Carter have expiring contracts in 2 years, freeing up $11 million, and Quicks $5 million in 3 years. With a ton of ELC for the next few years, now is the time to capitalize!

Sergachev Trade:
Well.. I’m not sure about this. I’m never good with values lol. LA have a ton of C prospects including Kupari, Turcotte, Vilardi, and Thomas. Although they just acquired Madden at the deadline, I feel like they could afford to move him (or another one of the C). Tampa would benefit by getting 3 good young players who are all on ELC, and capable of stepping into the big leagues (I think?) Acquiring Clague also “replaces” Sergachev on the left side. *Not saying he steps right in and is Sergy 2.0. Just fills the LD hole with Sergy being moved*

Deangelo Offeesheet:
The Rangers are loaded on the right side with Trouba, Fox, and Deangelo. I’m not sure if any can play on the left side. They have Lindren on the left, and Miller and Hajek on the way. So maybe they keep Deangelo. But I think and offer sheet to solidify LA defence couldn’t hurt. Maybe NYR says thank you and matches, or maybe they say “hello draft picks” and let him go.


Second Overall Trade:
Ok, so.. Byfield right? Apparently the highest ceiling out of the top prospects. The Kopitar replacement. The future!!! Ooooorr do they go after the multi positional forward in Stutzle. Either way, LA moves down and passes on a really good player. But hey, there’s really good players available at 5 too, and you add a mid first on top of that! Does LA take a Sanderson or Drysdale to load up the back end, which could nullify the Deangelo offersheet, or are they taking a Perfetti/Holtz/Rossi? Who knows. Maybe if they’re super lucky Askarov slides to the mid round pick, or more likely, they take a Bourque/Mysak who should be around the 20th pick, and give him a couple years to develop.


As always... I hope you enjoy this. Now rip me apart for whatever I’ve done wrong lol.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
66 250 000 $
56 000 000 $
1975 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Deangelo, Anthony6 000 000 $
Choix de 1e ronde en 2021
Choix de 3e ronde en 2021
Transactions
1.
2.
LAK
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (OTT)
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
Détails additionnels:
OTT 5th OVERALL and NYI mid 1st
OTT
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (LAK)
Détails additionnels:
2nd OVERALL
Rachats de contrats
Frais de résiliation
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NYI
Logo de OTT
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de VGK
Logo de LAK
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de CGY
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2021
Logo de LAK
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de LAK
Logo de CGY
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2022
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2581 500 000 $73 638 030 $0 $2 815 000 $7 861 970 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 636 364 $2 636 364 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
975 000 $975 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
858 333 $858 333 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
809 166 $809 166 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 août 2020 à 16 h 35
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,998
Mentions "j'aime": 1,183
Huge overpayment for Sergcahev. Madden and Kaliyev are expected to be future top 6ers. Clague is kind of a wild card at this point. His ceiling is a top 4 LD, but I doubt he ever reaches that. I'm sure the Kings would consider any of Kupari, Grundstrom, Durzi, and Spence.

I highly doubt Kings pass on Stutzle/Byfield even if it's for 5OA and a mid 20's pick.
4 août 2020 à 16 h 39
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,659
Mentions "j'aime": 1,626
I think the only way the 2 pick gets traded is for 1. Highly doubt Kings drop back
PuckLuck_77 a aimé ceci.
4 août 2020 à 16 h 43
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,328
Mentions "j'aime": 2,222
Couple of things:

1) If the Kings trade #2, it will be for #3. I can't see them moving out of the top-3 at all when the need in LA right now is Quality, not Quantity. As you pointed out, they're already a loaded prospect pool. As such, they need a franchise changer not more middle 6 players. To me that's the #2 pick, whoever they decide to go with. Not the #5 and someone else.

2) Kaliyev should be one of the few nearly untouchables. Not saying he couldn't ever be included in a trade, but as possibly the only sniper in a prospect pool full of playmakers Arthur isn't the prospect the Kings will eventually be shopping.

3) Rebuilding teams don't get rid of 1st round picks. Offer sheets are something I've explored, but I'll never go over the price of a 2nd round pick. It just doesn't make sense for LA, even if they're almost out of the rebuild.

4) Prokhorkin won't be returning to LA. He has signed a contract in the KHL.

5) Not sure if you paid attention to the lines or just let Capfriendly populate them, but there's a lot wrong there.
KINGS67 a aimé ceci.
4 août 2020 à 16 h 45
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,328
Mentions "j'aime": 2,222
Quoting: KINGS67
I think the only way the 2 pick gets traded is for 1. Highly doubt Kings drop back


I should have said "If the Kings trade #2, it will be for #1 or #3." I agree they'd look at moving up to #1. If they like Stutzle more than Byfield, I'd think they would explore giving the Sens the option to pick #2 for their #1C of the future... at the cost of an extra pick somewhere.
KINGS67 a aimé ceci.
4 août 2020 à 16 h 48
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,543
Mentions "j'aime": 6,138
I could see the Kings trading the #2 to Ottawa for the #3 and #20-something overall picks. That would allow Blake to punt the Byfield/Stutzle decision and make it a very easy choice. They're not going to move out of the top 3 though. Not sure it's worth it to Ottawa to give up a late 1st round pick when there's a 50/50 chance that the player that they want will still be available at #3.

Too much for Sergachev. There were some proposals floating around yesterday which included Kupari, Clague, and the VGK 2nd for Sergachev's rights. That's a more realistic trade. I don't think he's going anywhere though. I think Tampa re-signs him to an 8-year deal and moves out others to make the cap work.

Pass on Deangelo, especially at that price point. The Kings 2021 1st is off the table, meaning offer sheets this summer are off the table. If the Kings were to consider an offer sheet in the future (they won't), it won't happen until after the expansion draft.

Prokhorkin signed a contract with Metallurg of the KHL. He won't be returning.

Walker is going to get significantly more than that.
sens2020 a aimé ceci.
4 août 2020 à 16 h 49
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,543
Mentions "j'aime": 6,138
Quoting: KINGS67
I think the only way the 2 pick gets traded is for 1. Highly doubt Kings drop back


Quoting: PuckLuck_77
I should have said "If the Kings trade #2, it will be for #1 or #3." I agree they'd look at moving up to #1. If they like Stutzle more than Byfield, I'd think they would explore giving the Sens the option to pick #2 for their #1C of the future... at the cost of an extra pick somewhere.


I can't see the Kings paying the exorbitant price that it would take to move up from #2 to #1.
4 août 2020 à 16 h 53
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,328
Mentions "j'aime": 2,222
Quoting: tkecanuck341
I can't see the Kings paying the exorbitant price that it would take to move up from #2 to #1.


I don't think it's likely either, but I can see them exploring it. Blake wouldn't be doing his job otherwise. It all depends on the team that gets #1, I suppose. Say Calgary gets booted by Winnipeg and wins the lottery. Their need is much more in the middle of the ice than the wing. I'm curious what they'd want for #1.
4 août 2020 à 17 h 11
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,543
Mentions "j'aime": 6,138
Quoting: PuckLuck_77
I don't think it's likely either, but I can see them exploring it. Blake wouldn't be doing his job otherwise. It all depends on the team that gets #1, I suppose. Say Calgary gets booted by Winnipeg and wins the lottery. Their need is much more in the middle of the ice than the wing. I'm curious what they'd want for #1.


I'm sure he'd explore it, but Treliving wouldn't be doing his job unless he asked for a King's ransom in return for that pick. We're talking #2 + Turcotte/Vilardi + Thomas/Kupari.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage