SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

get better defensively and in terms of grit without harming the offence

Créé par: leafs101
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 3 août 2020
Publié: 3 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
22 250 000 $
22 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
43 250 000 $
22 200 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Nichushkin, Valeri [Droits de RFA]
  2. Zadorov, Nikita [Droits de RFA]
COL
  1. Dermott, Travis [Droits de RFA]
  2. Johnsson, Andreas
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Bonino, Nick (2 000 000 $ retained)
NSH
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. Tkachuk, Matthew
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
If Flames make it to the playoffs, 5th rounder becomes 3rd rounder.
If flames make it to the second round, 3rd rounder becomes 2nd rounder
If flames make it to the third round, 2nd rounder becomes 1st rounder
This way, the team that does worse on this trade is fairly compensated
CGY
  1. Marner, Mitchell
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (VGK)
Détails additionnels:
If Leafs make it to the playoffs, 5th rounder becomes 3rd rounder.
If Leafs make it to the second round, 3rd rounder becomes 2nd rounder
If Leafs make it to the third round, 2nd rounder becomes 1st rounder
4.
TOR
  1. Aston-Reese, Zach
  2. Blueger, Teddy
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
ZAR agrees to 2mil x 4 years
4th becomes 2nd rounder if Leafs do not make the second round
PIT
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
5.
TOR
  1. Hunt, Brad (350 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de PIT
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
Logo de MIN
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $81 393 450 $0 $0 $106 550 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
350 000 $350 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 août 2020 à 16 h 30
#1
HutsonNorlinderGuhle
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 2,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,377
Bonino retained for Kerfoot straight up would be an interesting trade,
Marner trade is intriguing. Flames would love you but it is also great for you
3 août 2020 à 16 h 31
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,991
Mentions "j'aime": 9,300
@JaredOfLondon according to you, the Leafs don't need grit but clearly your brethren don't agree and as you know, I don't agree with you either
3 août 2020 à 16 h 35
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,202
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Quoting: ChiHawk
@JaredOfLondon according to you, the Leafs don't need grit but clearly your brethren don't agree and as you know, I don't agree with you either


I think they could more grit and better defensive forwards, but NOT at the expense of the offence of this team. This team is still just as scary offensively, but brings an element that makes them versatile enough to match up well in pretty well any playoff series. Would also take the load off the D quite a bit, which I think has improved with the defensive-defensemen that I brought in - Zadorov, Braun, and Demelo
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
3 août 2020 à 16 h 38
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,202
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Quoting: HabsFan9
Bonino retained for Kerfoot straight up would be an interesting trade,
Marner trade is intriguing. Flames would love you but it is also great for you


The way I see the flames trade is that CAL gets the producing star to go with an already rugged team, and to make Gaudreau far more expendable with just two years left on his deal. Leafs get a bit more toughness, but still bring back a guy that brings immense offensive talent. Whichever team does worse after the trade, gets the higher pick.
Remus a aimé ceci.
3 août 2020 à 16 h 38
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,991
Mentions "j'aime": 9,300
Quoting: leafs101
I think they could more grit and better defensive forwards, but NOT at the expense of the offence of this team. This team is still just as scary offensively, but brings an element that makes them versatile enough to match up well in pretty well any playoff series. Would also take the load off the D quite a bit, which I think has improved with the defensive-defensemen that I brought in - Zadorov, Braun, and Demelo


Exactly! There is not a line of 3 guys in the forward group who are great defensively and physical, that's a problem. Usually this is the 4th line and you want to put them on the ice as much as possible against the top line of the opposing team, Leafs lack that.
3 août 2020 à 16 h 40
#6
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Quoting: ChiHawk
Exactly! There is not a line of 3 guys in the forward group who are great defensively and physical, that's a problem. Usually this is the 4th line and you want to put them on the ice as much as possible against the top line of the opposing team, Leafs lack that.


But, but, all they need to do is to outscore everyone right? It's that simple right?
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
3 août 2020 à 16 h 40
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,579
Mentions "j'aime": 7,353
Quoting: ChiHawk
@JaredOfLondon according to you, the Leafs don't need grit but clearly your brethren don't agree and as you know, I don't agree with you either


Except there is adding grit on a guy they don't n3ed like Shaw or bringing in someone who they need (a defender for instance) who happens to also have grit. They arny being brought in for just sandpaper and redundancy
3 août 2020 à 16 h 42
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,579
Mentions "j'aime": 7,353
Quoting: leafs101
I think they could more grit and better defensive forwards, but NOT at the expense of the offence of this team. This team is still just as scary offensively, but brings an element that makes them versatile enough to match up well in pretty well any playoff series. Would also take the load off the D quite a bit, which I think has improved with the defensive-defensemen that I brought in - Zadorov, Braun, and Demelo


i mean other han zadorov who isnt great and too expensive on top of being a LD they dont need, demelo and braun make sense from an asset standpoint
3 août 2020 à 16 h 42
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,202
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
But, but, all they need to do is to outscore everyone right? It's that simple right?


for this year's playoffs yes because they have no better options lol
3 août 2020 à 16 h 44
#10
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Quoting: leafs101
for this year's playoffs yes because they have no better options lol


Right, but that's not objectively the best thing... that's my point haha
leafs101 a aimé ceci.
3 août 2020 à 16 h 47
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 2,088
Mentions "j'aime": 686
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah you think the flames would trade tkachuk for Marner. Your hockey knowledge is 0
3 août 2020 à 16 h 53
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,243
Mentions "j'aime": 19,510
I think we'll keep Chucky in Calgary but thanks for the offer
3 août 2020 à 16 h 55
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,579
Mentions "j'aime": 7,353
That pens trade is reall bad
3 août 2020 à 16 h 56
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,579
Mentions "j'aime": 7,353
Quoting: flamesfan
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah you think the flames would trade tkachuk for Marner. Your hockey knowledge is 0


Settle down francis
3 août 2020 à 17 h 0
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,598
Mentions "j'aime": 5,193
Switch the 2nd to 2020, and I think NSH should seriously consider this.
3 août 2020 à 17 h 57
#16
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
The overall value in the Colorado trade isn't bad, but I just don't see how it benefits Colorado on the ice right now.

Nichushkin, Valeri [RFA Rights]
Zadorov, Nikita [RFA Rights]

for

Johnsson, Andreas
Dermott, Travis [RFA Rights]
2021 2nd round pick (TOR)
2022 3rd round pick (TOR)
2020 4th round pick (TOR)

The first part of the trade, Zadorov for 2nd + 3rd, is fine - just not happy with it being 2021 and 2022. One needs to be in 2020, or both in 2021. Anyways, that part is fine basically.

Nichuskin for Johnsson, Dermott, and 4th seems like good value in a vacuum. BUT, the thing is that Colorado have zero need for Dermott since we're set at LHD. And downgrading defensively from Nichuskin to Johnsson just doesn't do anything for us. We are after all trying to win right now.

Not a bad offer, and admittedly even a little bit of an overpay by Colorado value-wise, but it doesn't help our team so it's not a trade I think Sakic would do.
UpsideDownQue a aimé ceci.
3 août 2020 à 19 h 3
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: HabsFan9
Bonino retained for Kerfoot straight up would be an interesting trade,
Marner trade is intriguing. Flames would love you but it is also great for you


Yeah, the other team should retain on the far better player just because you know, leafs.

Leaves logic.
3 août 2020 à 19 h 7
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,202
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Quoting: pharrow
Yeah, the other team should retain on the far better player just because you know, leafs.

Leaves logic.


well the reason they would is due to contract length. I still think leafs would have to add at the very least a third to get it done. I added a second because the market for Bonino could heat up quite a bit
3 août 2020 à 19 h 8
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,202
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
That pens trade is reall bad


Ya but it would take a bit of an overpay, and those two guys are two of the best defensive forwards in the game. You could literally match that fourth line up against any line and free up the big 4 to go full offensive
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage