SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If they lose

Créé par: csick
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 2 août 2020
Publié: 2 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
21 500 000 $
1900 000 $
32 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Rakell, Rickard
Détails additionnels:
Similar to Zucker trade
ANA
  1. Bjugstad, Nick
  2. Hållander, Filip
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
2.
PIT
  1. Simek, Radim
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (COL)
SJS
3.
PIT
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Rodrigues, Evan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de COL
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $78 529 981 $0 $850 000 $2 970 019 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 5
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 août 2020 à 17 h 35
#1
Sabres fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 4,719
Mentions "j'aime": 2,955
You actually think anyone would give up an asset for Evan Rodrigues? Have you ever watched him play? You couldn’t even trade him to Edmonton for Puljujarvi, who is equally useless.
2 août 2020 à 17 h 37
#2
Démarrer sujet
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,152
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
Quoting: Tjm220
You actually think anyone would give up an asset for Evan Rodrigues? Have you ever watched him play? You couldn’t even trade him to Edmonton for Puljujarvi, who is equally useless.


hes really just a throw in the deal, Toronto doesnt need to sign him and Kerfoot is worth about a 2nd rounder
2 août 2020 à 17 h 41
#3
Sabres fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 4,719
Mentions "j'aime": 2,955
Quoting: csick
hes really just a throw in the deal, Toronto doesnt need to sign him and Kerfoot is worth about a 2nd rounder


They would get more for Kerfoot from someone else. Why even throw in Rodrigues if Toronto won’t want him?
2 août 2020 à 17 h 49
#4
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,668
Mentions "j'aime": 24,582
Anaheim says yes if you make the prospect Nathan Legare.
2 août 2020 à 18 h 0
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
penguins aren't taking any of those trades. they suck.

No use for kerfoot. Over priced and not that good.
the SJS trade is a total joke.
and the ANA trade is far too much for a guy who's slumping.
Not to mention the fact he doesn't solve their needs. No one is mistaking him for someone who you can run a power play through, put on the left wall and let him shoot.
2 août 2020 à 18 h 23
#6
Démarrer sujet
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,152
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Anaheim says yes if you make the prospect Nathan Legare.


done
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 août 2020 à 19 h 10
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: pharrow
penguins aren't taking any of those trades. they suck.

No use for kerfoot. Over priced and not that good.
the SJS trade is a total joke.
and the ANA trade is far too much for a guy who's slumping.
Not to mention the fact he doesn't solve their needs. No one is mistaking him for someone who you can run a power play through, put on the left wall and let him shoot.


Kerfoot would be a good 3C for us
csick et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 août 2020 à 20 h 10
#8
Démarrer sujet
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,152
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
Quoting: mhockey91
Kerfoot would be a good 3C for us


Exactly as a 3C to take off the pressure defensively From the top 2 lines along with McCann and Taney
mhockey91 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 août 2020 à 20 h 19
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Sharks trade is very good value wise for us, but we really don’t want Murray. He may bounce back, but I’m not sure we can affor him.
2 août 2020 à 20 h 26
#10
Démarrer sujet
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,152
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Sharks trade is very good value wise for us, but we really don’t want Murray. He may bounce back, but I’m not sure we can affor him.


I feel like the Sharks will buy out Jones. Too much dead money between Vlasic and Jones
2 août 2020 à 23 h 27
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: csick
I feel like the Sharks will buy out Jones. Too much dead money between Vlasic and Jones


Yes there is too much money tied up in Vlasic and Jones, but I really don't like the idea of buying him out. He's shown some glimpses of hope, and while I don't necessarily expect him to live up to his contract, I'd rather not waste money on a buyout where that money is truly dead. Especially considering we're gonna be in cap trouble for years to come.
3 août 2020 à 9 h 12
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: mhockey91
Kerfoot would be a good 3C for us


This team needs a 3.5 million 4C like you need a new hole in your head.

He'd be no better than the 4th best center on this team.
I'd rather let Hallander play.
3 août 2020 à 14 h 55
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: pharrow
This team needs a 3.5 million 4C like you need a new hole in your head.

He'd be no better than the 4th best center on this team.
I'd rather let Hallander play.


You are insane. He’d be our 3C. McCann-Kerfoot-Hornqvist would be a great 3rd line for us. 3.5 million for a 3C is a fair price. I wouldn’t be opposed to playing Hallender at 3C but that’s only if he’s ready
csick a aimé ceci.
3 août 2020 à 15 h 9
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: mhockey91
You are insane. He’d be our 3C. McCann-Kerfoot-Hornqvist would be a great 3rd line for us. 3.5 million for a 3C is a fair price. I wouldn’t be opposed to playing Hallender at 3C but that’s only if he’s ready


he'd be the 4th best center on the team at best. Blueger would out play him.
He put up 9 goals this year. 9. The same number as Blueger did, with a lot less offensive help.
And he's not nearly as good a defender.

At 3.5 million pass.
He can keep under performing in TOR.
3 août 2020 à 15 h 11
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: pharrow
he'd be the 4th best center on the team at best. Blueger would out play him.
He put up 9 goals this year. 9. The same number as Blueger did, with a lot less offensive help.
And he's not nearly as good a defender.

At 3.5 million pass.
He can keep under performing in TOR.


Kerfoot is actually very solid defensively. Maybe not as good as Blueger but he’s very good two way. Combine that with the fact that he’s usually scoring around 40 points a year and he would be an excellent 3C for us.
csick a aimé ceci.
3 août 2020 à 15 h 16
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: mhockey91
Kerfoot is actually very solid defensively. Maybe not as good as Blueger but he’s very good two way. Combine that with the fact that he’s usually scoring around 40 points a year and he would be an excellent 3C for us.


he had twice the offensive weapons Blueger had this year. Put up more the same amount of goals and what 6 points more.
Yeah no thanks.
Kerfoot played with Kap and superman. There is a single person on the penguins 4th line with that kind of offensive upside and he couldn't produce more.

This is like continuing to say Sheary is a relevant player when it's clear he isn't and can't even keep on his damn feet.

I hate to break it to you, but we could get 9 goals and 20 some points out of Hallander, at 1/4 the cost.
3 août 2020 à 15 h 25
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: pharrow
he had twice the offensive weapons Blueger had this year. Put up more the same amount of goals and what 6 points more.
Yeah no thanks.
Kerfoot played with Kap and superman. There is a single person on the penguins 4th line with that kind of offensive upside and he couldn't produce more.

This is like continuing to say Sheary is a relevant player when it's clear he isn't and can't even keep on his damn feet.

I hate to break it to you, but we could get 9 goals and 20 some points out of Hallander, at 1/4 the cost.


https://twitter.com/gunnerstaal/status/1290019953643577351?s=21

Your sheary theory is debunked. As for kerfoot, he’s put up 40 points before. He would get that on pit. He struggled a little this year sure, but he’s far better than Blueger
3 août 2020 à 15 h 33
#18
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: mhockey91
https://twitter.com/gunnerstaal/status/1290019953643577351?s=21

Your sheary theory is debunked. As for kerfoot, he’s put up 40 points before. He would get that on pit. He struggled a little this year sure, but he’s far better than Blueger


sheary theory debunked.........Jake and Crosby carried him on their back and it's debunked. tears of joy
Finding Sheary actually still on his skates is like playing where's waldo.
His Cref was -3.9 the worst of any top 6 player.

But go on tell us how the midget winger is so great again. FFS he'll be spending more time picking up his teeth tonight than playing hockey.

Kerfoot blows. He's not worth 3.5 million, and he's not a better player than Blueger.
enough of that bad take.
3 août 2020 à 15 h 37
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: pharrow
sheary theory debunked.........Jake and Crosby carried him on their back and it's debunked. tears of joy
Finding Sheary actually still on his skates is like playing where's waldo.
His Cref was -3.9 the worst of any top 6 player.

But go on tell us how the midget winger is so great again. FFS he'll be spending more time picking up his teeth tonight than playing hockey.

Kerfoot blows. He's not worth 3.5 million, and he's not a better player than Blueger.
enough of that bad take.


Sheary is effective. He is a useful player. What games are you watching? He struggles at finishing but he does a lot of the little things right. I don’t get the sheary hate at all.

Your takes are so bad. Especially on kerfoot lol. Wow
3 août 2020 à 15 h 39
#20
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: mhockey91
Sheary is effective. He is a useful player. What games are you watching? He struggles at finishing but he does a lot of the little things right. I don’t get the sheary hate at all.

Your takes are so bad. Especially on kerfoot lol. Wow


yeah he's a real useful player.....if you want a body to mop the ice up with because he's always being tossed down on it like a rag doll.

Just more bad ideas like trading for a 3.5 million dollar 4C who scores 9 goals a year.
3 août 2020 à 16 h 28
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: pharrow
penguins aren't taking any of those trades. they suck.

No use for kerfoot. Over priced and not that good.
the SJS trade is a total joke.
and the ANA trade is far too much for a guy who's slumping.
Not to mention the fact he doesn't solve their needs. No one is mistaking him for someone who you can run a power play through, put on the left wall and let him shoot.


Rakell isn't slumping, he is a scoring 3rd liner that has a couple good goal scoring seasons, 3 years ago, where he had a 18.6 shooting %. Over rated value wise.
3 août 2020 à 16 h 47
#22
Démarrer sujet
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,152
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
Quoting: Yojimbo
Rakell isn't slumping, he is a scoring 3rd liner that has a couple good goal scoring seasons, 3 years ago, where he had a 18.6 shooting %. Over rated value wise.


he has averaged over 50pts a game / 82 the last 4 years
3 août 2020 à 17 h 14
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: csick
he has averaged over 50pts a game / 82 the last 4 years


50 points a game? Yowza!
3 août 2020 à 18 h 57
#24
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: Yojimbo
Rakell isn't slumping, he is a scoring 3rd liner that has a couple good goal scoring seasons, 3 years ago, where he had a 18.6 shooting %. Over rated value wise.


I didn't want to trash their player that hard. I mean they are a last place team and it's not like they got a lot of talent.
3 août 2020 à 22 h 51
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: pharrow
yeah he's a real useful player.....if you want a body to mop the ice up with because he's always being tossed down on it like a rag doll.

Just more bad ideas like trading for a 3.5 million dollar 4C who scores 9 goals a year.


Wow sheary really sucked today eh??? Keep on hating and he’ll keep on performing. He’s a useful NHL player despite your bias against him
csick a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage