SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bolts- A lot of NTCs need to be waived

Créé par: firezfurx
Équipe: 2020-21 Lightning de Tampa Bay
Date de création initiale: 27 juill. 2020
Publié: 27 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
35 710 000 $
36 498 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 800 000 $
1900 000 $
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Cernak, Erik [Droits de RFA]
2.
TBL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (ARI)
ARI
  1. Killorn, Alex
Détails additionnels:
If Hall doesn't resign. Ownership has shown they are willing to blindly push the on-ice product.
3.
SJS
  1. Palat, Ondrej
Détails additionnels:
Helps them bulk up on the RW if they chose not to rebuild
4.
TBL
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (OTT)
Détails additionnels:
Could lead as a veteran presence through the rebuild.
OTT
  1. Gourde, Yanni
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TBL)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de PHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de DET
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
2021
Logo de TBL
Logo de ARI
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de NSH
Logo de NJD
2022
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $81 705 591 $0 $900 000 $-205 591 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 710 000 $5 710 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
759 258 $759 258 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 498 000 $6 498 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 juill. 2020 à 1 h 39
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,443
Mentions "j'aime": 4,149
Leafs Accept.
More will be needed to entice Ottawa (or any team) to take Gourde for his entire contract. She's a long one!
27 juill. 2020 à 1 h 46
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,214
Mentions "j'aime": 2,867
From a Sharks perspective, it's a good trade, but I can't help but wonder why Tampa would take back 1.5 million in Sorensen instead of just taking back picks. It would make more sense for them that way...
27 juill. 2020 à 1 h 58
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,981
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Sens have too many young forwards who will be pushing for NHL spots in the next two years for them to be willing to take on a contract that big for 5 years. Yanni Gourde is not even close to being worth that contract, and it makes absolutely no sense for Ottawa to tie their own hands by locking up a roster spot for half a decade for such a mediocre player.

I really don't see anyone being interested in Gourde at all. Of the four big contracts Tampa will look to move, he's easily the hardest to move.
palhal a aimé ceci.
27 juill. 2020 à 2 h 5
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 949
Mentions "j'aime": 262
How many NTC's players do you think will accept a trade from a tax advantage state like Florida with a Cup contender to rebuilding teams plus a team where a successful GM had a contract dispute with ownership? And Toronto's got its own cap problems---there not going to trade an ELC Liljegren for a RFA problem.

I think you'd be lucky to get 1 to accept. And the team that acquire them are negotiating from a position of strength--knowing Tampa's cap issue--so your returns don't account for this.
Book_Hockey et palhal a aimé ceci.
27 juill. 2020 à 7 h 19
#5
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
From a Sharks perspective, it's a good trade, but I can't help but wonder why Tampa would take back 1.5 million in Sorensen instead of just taking back picks. It would make more sense for them that way...

Palat likely won't waive to go to a worse team. And if he does Tampa probably want like a 2nd for him instead of salary coming back.
27 juill. 2020 à 7 h 21
#6
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: dca919
How many NTC's players do you think will accept a trade from a tax advantage state like Florida with a Cup contender to rebuilding teams plus a team where a successful GM had a contract dispute with ownership? And Toronto's got its own cap problems---there not going to trade an ELC Liljegren for a RFA problem.

I think you'd be lucky to get 1 to accept. And the team that acquire them are negotiating from a position of strength--knowing Tampa's cap issue--so your returns don't account for this.


I could see Gourde waiving for the opportunity to play a bigger role somewhere, but moving him is the hard part. Tampa may have to pay a 1st to entice someone to take him.

As good as Cernak is I also don't see them moving an ELC contract for him. Especially not when they could OS Cernak and only pay a 2nd in compensation.
27 juill. 2020 à 10 h 0
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,123
Mentions "j'aime": 246
Done on Cernak.
27 juill. 2020 à 15 h 49
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,214
Mentions "j'aime": 2,867
Quoting: Richard88
Palat likely won't waive to go to a worse team. And if he does Tampa probably want like a 2nd for him instead of salary coming back.


Right...that's what I'm saying...
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
27 juill. 2020 à 15 h 57
#9
Démarrer sujet
Dubas isnt a genius
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 2,824
Mentions "j'aime": 681
Quoting: dca919
How many NTC's players do you think will accept a trade from a tax advantage state like Florida with a Cup contender to rebuilding teams plus a team where a successful GM had a contract dispute with ownership? And Toronto's got its own cap problems---there not going to trade an ELC Liljegren for a RFA problem.

I think you'd be lucky to get 1 to accept. And the team that acquire them are negotiating from a position of strength--knowing Tampa's cap issue--so your returns don't account for this.


I actually made the Toronto trade as a Toronto fan and I'm 90% sure they would accept.

The other trades are a mess for sure.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage