SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Wild 2020-21 maybe

Créé par: jolson12
Équipe: 2020-21 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 24 juill. 2020
Publié: 24 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Let me know what you think of trades/signings
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
22 750 000 $
11 000 000 $
1975 000 $
1975 000 $
2975 000 $
11 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
1850 000 $
1850 000 $
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Nugent-Hopkins, Ryan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Dumba, Matt
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
2.
MIN
  1. Georgiev, Alexandar [Droits de RFA]
NYR
  1. Dubnyk, Devan
  2. Greenway, Jordan
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de MIN
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2021
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $65 174 424 $0 $925 000 $16 325 576 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 625 000 $1 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 487 500 $1 487 500 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
975 000 $975 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
850 000 $850 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
700 000 $700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 juill. 2020 à 14 h 43
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
Oilers decline. Nuge will be next to impossible to pry from Edmonton not to mention as good as dumba is oilers don’t need him nearly enough.
24 juill. 2020 à 14 h 55
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 951
Mentions "j'aime": 817
Edmonton won't do that. I'd love it, but I know they won't. This for a couple of reasons:

1.) They don't need RD right now unless it's a sure fire star. They're already doing a good job developing what they currently have at RD and Dumba is more of a reclamation project right now than a star. They'd rather save the cap hit and develop what they currently have in their system.
2.) RNH had a fantastic season. He's really rounding into a really good 2-way center. Really good 2-way centers are hard to find. When you find one, you hold on to them unless you receive an amazing offer.
3.) After last year, their values went in opposite directions. Don't get me wrong, I still think Dumba will return to 50 pt form but recent memories of him cast doubt. Therefore RNH is highly more valuable than Dumba is.

Because of the reasons I stated above, RNH won't wear a Wild jersey unless we make an outrageous offer for him.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
24 juill. 2020 à 15 h 9
#3
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,521
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
No thanks.
24 juill. 2020 à 15 h 17
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 13
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
No thanks.

Why wouldn’t NYR take Greenway for Georgiev? Shesty will be your starter, and Georgiev is a more definitive starter who shouldn’t be a backup. Do you think more picks are needed?
24 juill. 2020 à 15 h 21
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 13
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: mnwild1790
Edmonton won't do that. I'd love it, but I know they won't. This for a couple of reasons:

1.) They don't need RD right now unless it's a sure fire star. They're already doing a good job developing what they currently have at RD and Dumba is more of a reclamation project right now than a star. They'd rather save the cap hit and develop what they currently have in their system.
2.) RNH had a fantastic season. He's really rounding into a really good 2-way center. Really good 2-way centers are hard to find. When you find one, you hold on to them unless you receive an amazing offer.
3.) After last year, their values went in opposite directions. Don't get me wrong, I still think Dumba will return to 50 pt form but recent memories of him cast doubt. Therefore RNH is highly more valuable than Dumba is.

Because of the reasons I stated above, RNH won't wear a Wild jersey unless we make an outrageous offer for him.

Understandable, agree with your points and makes total sense. Seen some other centers thrown out like Cirelli, which would be nice but RNH seemed better to me, Edmonton has a good one on their hands. What do you think of the other trade, Georgiev for Greenway/Dubnyk? One sided for MN or?
mnwild1790 a aimé ceci.
24 juill. 2020 à 15 h 24
#6
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,521
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: jolson12
Why wouldn’t NYR take Greenway for Georgiev? Shesty will be your starter, and Georgiev is a more definitive starter who shouldn’t be a backup. Do you think more picks are needed?


I would love Greenway but it simply goes down to our depth at W. We have filled wings and need C's and LHD's. trading from our tandem would hurt for a player who will not be a regular. Also, NYR can't afford to extend Greenway and eat Dubnyk's deal here too.
mnwild1790 a aimé ceci.
24 juill. 2020 à 15 h 28
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 951
Mentions "j'aime": 817
Quoting: jolson12
Understandable, agree with your points and makes total sense. Seen some other centers thrown out like Cirelli, which would be nice but RNH seemed better to me, Edmonton has a good one on their hands. What do you think of the other trade, Georgiev for Greenway/Dubnyk? One sided for MN or?


I think it's one sided towards MN as well. I think Greenway for Georgiev straight up is much closer in value but the cap dump for Dubnyk means we have to add. They are in a similar predicament to us in regards to the fact they have too many goalies that are NHL ready. If they were to take on Dubnyk's contract, they'd want to be compensated for it...at least in my opinion that is
24 juill. 2020 à 15 h 29
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 951
Mentions "j'aime": 817
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
I would love Greenway but it simply goes down to our depth at W. We have filled wings and need C's and LHD's. trading from our tandem would hurt for a player who will not be a regular. Also, NYR can't afford to extend Greenway and eat Dubnyk's deal here too.


We have similar problems in that regard. I just don't see Rangers and Wild being good trade partners this offseason.
24 juill. 2020 à 15 h 35
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
haha Rangers decline. Srsly Dubnyk is the worst goalie in the league.
24 juill. 2020 à 15 h 39
#10
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,521
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: mnwild1790
We have similar problems in that regard. I just don't see Rangers and Wild being good trade partners this offseason.


Yeah because we both need the same things and our strengths align.
24 juill. 2020 à 15 h 41
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 951
Mentions "j'aime": 817
Quoting: Sagecoll
haha Rangers decline. Srsly Dubnyk is the worst goalie in the league.


Yep, and the advanced metrics back up this statement. He is really bad.
24 juill. 2020 à 15 h 56
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 115
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Quoting: jolson12
Why wouldn’t NYR take Greenway for Georgiev? Shesty will be your starter, and Georgiev is a more definitive starter who shouldn’t be a backup. Do you think more picks are needed?


I think the plan for the Rangers is to keep Georgiev as a backup until one of the other goalie prospects is ready. Maybe 2 - 3 years. Would the Wild do a Lias Andersson for Greenway swap? Would they need to throw in a mid level pick?
24 juill. 2020 à 16 h 3
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: mnwild1790
Yep, and the advanced metrics back up this statement. He is really bad.


tbh I can see a trade with Minnesota. I just don't see it with Georgiev. Wild probably sees Kaaponen as the long term goalie. Dubnyk needs a buyout or some team to take him on somehow. Stalock is also pretty terrible, Minnesota isn't going anywhere with either of those 2 getting 30 starts or more. Which is all sad because the Wild are a great team in every way except goaltending. I could see Guerin dealing for a 1 year stop gap to mentor Kaaponen while keeping the team competitive as long as it doesn't cost much of anything in assets. Lundqvist would work really well there. Could see something around him at half retained for an expendable bottom 6 F like Hartman. Rangers would probably throw in a smaller piece to make it work. But something like that makes sense for both teams. But statistically the difference is absolutely massive.
mnwild1790 et MNBassman a aimé ceci.
24 juill. 2020 à 16 h 6
#14
Kafle
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,467
Mentions "j'aime": 483
oilers pass, they don't really need dumba as they need nuge
24 juill. 2020 à 16 h 33
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 951
Mentions "j'aime": 817
Quoting: Sagecoll
tbh I can see a trade with Minnesota. I just don't see it with Georgiev. Wild probably sees Kaaponen as the long term goalie. Dubnyk needs a buyout or some team to take him on somehow. Stalock is also pretty terrible, Minnesota isn't going anywhere with either of those 2 getting 30 starts or more. Which is all sad because the Wild are a great team in every way except goaltending. I could see Guerin dealing for a 1 year stop gap to mentor Kaaponen while keeping the team competitive as long as it doesn't cost much of anything in assets. Lundqvist would work really well there. Could see something around him at half retained for an expendable bottom 6 F like Hartman. Rangers would probably throw in a smaller piece to make it work. But something like that makes sense for both teams. But statistically the difference is absolutely massive.


100% agree on the assessment of our team. And if that's the route Guerin wants to go, I'd have no complaints. I like Hartman but he's expendable. I'd be on board for that. However, still need to find a way to move Dubnyk or else we have 4 goalies that are NHL ready.
Sagecoll a aimé ceci.
24 juill. 2020 à 16 h 34
#16
Hockey Fan13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,914
Mentions "j'aime": 2,487
Don't see New York taking Dubnyk back in that trade. But Greenway and a 5th are all I would offer for Georgiev.
1 Wild have Kahkonen
2 Georgiev isn't really a stud, great back up probably middle of the road starter.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage