SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Needs to do something

Créé par: GMs
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 23 juill. 2020
Publié: 23 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Targets :

Jost
Fast
Sheary

Jost can play 3C if needed and Sheary bumps to 2LW
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
44 000 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
1950 000 $
42 750 000 $
22 500 000 $
11 750 000 $
1700 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Jost, Tyson [Droits de RFA]
COL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (COL)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (NSH)
NSH
  1. Sörensen, Marcus
Détails additionnels:
Any team
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de NSH
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $74 254 166 $0 $430 000 $7 245 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 juill. 2020 à 6 h 54
#1
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
TJ has Full NTC till 2021-22
YG has Full NTC till 2022-23

Neither are waiving to join one of the 7/31 teams not to be in this years 24 teams playoff .
OTT and BUF are not teams that guys on top contenders waive their NTC for
23 juill. 2020 à 7 h 22
#2
Hockee
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,775
Mentions "j'aime": 868
Quoting: Billy739
TJ has Full NTC till 2021-22
YG has Full NTC till 2022-23

Neither are waiving to join one of the 7/31 teams not to be in this years 24 teams playoff .
OTT and BUF are not teams that guys on top contenders waive their NTC for


Wrong ACGM my guy
GMs a aimé ceci.
23 juill. 2020 à 7 h 25
#3
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,580
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
I think we can get a higher 2nd for Jost than our own 2nd back which will (hopefully) be in the early 60's. A pick that late rarely ever amounts to an NHL player so I'd rather just keep Jost if this is the return. Jost will be really cheap to keep around and provides good depth and versatility and can help this team win right now which is more than can be said for those picks which if we're lucky might amount to a player like Jost...
McRanteskog a aimé ceci.
23 juill. 2020 à 7 h 36
#4
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
Quoting: deys3232
Wrong ACGM my guy


The system lagged out and force logged me out when i tried posting this message on another post
i'm assuming this is a direct result of that expired session error and forced log out

i saw you tag me and got to this post confused as i never seen it before now lol
GMs et deys3232 a aimé ceci.
23 juill. 2020 à 7 h 40
#5
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
Quoting: Richard88
I think we can get a higher 2nd for Jost than our own 2nd back which will (hopefully) be in the early 60's. A pick that late rarely ever amounts to an NHL player so I'd rather just keep Jost if this is the return. Jost will be really cheap to keep around and provides good depth and versatility and can help this team win right now which is more than can be said for those picks which if we're lucky might amount to a player like Jost...


MTL would give you a higher 2nd but overall Jost isnt worth much more outside maybe a very late 1st to a conference final team

Jost to me is a guy COL trades in a bigger package as the small piece or with a high 2nd accompanied by a similar player like Jake Evans(Similar style from AHL points leader in Laval the past 2 years and had good call up outings but is a clear cut bottom 6 guy at the NHL level and nothing more )
23 juill. 2020 à 7 h 51
#6
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,580
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: Billy739
MTL would give you a higher 2nd but overall Jost isnt worth much more outside maybe a very late 1st to a conference final team

Jost to me is a guy COL trades in a bigger package as the small piece or with a high 2nd accompanied by a similar player like Jake Evans(Similar style from AHL points leader in Laval the past 2 years and had good call up outings but is a clear cut bottom 6 guy at the NHL level and nothing more )


By a higher 2nd are you referring to one of the Montreal and Chicago picks (#39/40)? If so I'd be inclined to accept that if you also add a late 3rd or early 4th.

I agree that the best way to get value from Jost in a trade is probably in a package trade. Something like Jost + pick for Josh Anderson or something to that effect.

The fact that he's (at least) a versatile and defensively reliable 3rd liner at what will likely be a <$2m caphit makes him an interesting player for teams with cap issues. I could see teams like NYI, Pittsburgh, Chicago, SJ, or Tampa being interested for example.
23 juill. 2020 à 8 h 50
#7
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Quoting: Richard88
I think we can get a higher 2nd for Jost than our own 2nd back which will (hopefully) be in the early 60's. A pick that late rarely ever amounts to an NHL player so I'd rather just keep Jost if this is the return. Jost will be really cheap to keep around and provides good depth and versatility and can help this team win right now which is more than can be said for those picks which if we're lucky might amount to a player like Jost...


I sorta feel the same way, that we could get just one trade piece back for higher value.
That being said, even if the return was still just a late first or early second round pick, Id still rather hold onto Jost
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
23 juill. 2020 à 9 h 11
#8
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,580
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: McRanteskog
I sorta feel the same way, that we could get just one trade piece back for higher value.
That being said, even if the return was still just a late first or early second round pick, Id still rather hold onto Jost


If the offer is a late 1st for Jost you'd have to take that, especially if it's in this years draft which is very deep. It's just bad asset management to pass that sort of pick up for a player that realistically is going to be a depth forward for us after we add a top 6 forward this offseason.
McRanteskog a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage