SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Yes or no

Créé par: ZiggyPalffy
Équipe: 2020-21 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 23 juill. 2020
Publié: 23 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
LAK
    Rights to Vasily Podkolzin.
    Rachats de contrats
    Frais appliqués
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de ANA
    2021
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    2022
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    1881 500 000 $66 540 211 $1 700 000 $4 550 000 $14 959 789 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    4 375 000 $4 375 000 $
    AD, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    925 000 $925 000 $
    C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    863 333 $863 333 $
    C, AG, AD
    RFA - 3
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    23 juill. 2020 à 4 h 6
    #1
    Hockee
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2020
    Messages: 2,775
    Mentions "j'aime": 868
    Uh. No
    23 juill. 2020 à 4 h 9
    #2
    StevieY19!!
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 1,064
    Mentions "j'aime": 689
    Big no from VAN those two players aren't nearly as valuable as Pod
    remowilliams a aimé ceci.
    23 juill. 2020 à 4 h 27
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 14,042
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
    Quoting: AnyoneButTheBruins
    Big no from VAN those two players aren't nearly as valuable as Pod


    This is an annoying comment
    I won’t say anything bad I’ll get a warning but say something constructive like why etc. He’s sending one A- and B+ prospect for an A+ prospect, not bad IMO
    ZiggyPalffy et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    23 juill. 2020 à 4 h 35
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 9,721
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
    Quoting: GMs
    This is an annoying comment
    I won’t say anything bad I’ll get a warning but say something constructive like why etc. He’s sending one A- and B+ prospect for an A+ prospect, not bad IMO


    I usually don't respond to the ones that don't sound intelligent and don't elaborate.

    I appreciate the feedback. I thought it was a pretty good idea, but that's just me.
    GMs et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    23 juill. 2020 à 5 h 0
    #5
    2018 Canucks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 2,172
    Mentions "j'aime": 747
    2 ways to look at this deal.

    Going back it’s a later 1st & a 3rd for a top 10 1st that wouldn’t be accepted on the draft floor.

    Fast forward Kupari isn’t looking to be top 6 as of yet or maybe not at all & Madden a 3C maybe 2C if he excels a big IF. Therefore neither would be a fit as the roster stands or with other prospects in the pipeline.

    So a no
    23 juill. 2020 à 5 h 3
    #6
    StevieY19!!
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 1,064
    Mentions "j'aime": 689
    Quoting: GMs
    This is an annoying comment
    I won’t say anything bad I’ll get a warning but say something constructive like why etc. He’s sending one A- and B+ prospect for an A+ prospect, not bad IMO


    Quoting: Bf3351
    I usually don't respond to the ones that don't sound intelligent and don't elaborate.

    I appreciate the feedback. I thought it was a pretty good idea, but that's just me.


    Alright let's say for instance would you trade the 10th overall pick for the 20th overall pick and a 3rd? I wouldn't. Now would you trade that 10th overall that has developed handsomely for one player that has developed at par of where he was drafted and B prospect. No again IMO. Also, I get what you are saying about the comment above, but it is late at night so I felt lazy with that comment and I do apologize. I normally do like to put in some actual feedback.
    23 juill. 2020 à 5 h 4
    #7
    StevieY19!!
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 1,064
    Mentions "j'aime": 689
    Quoting: Nighthawk
    2 ways to look at this deal.

    Going back it’s a later 1st & a 3rd for a top 10 1st that wouldn’t be accepted on the draft floor.

    Fast forward Kupari isn’t looking to be top 6 as of yet or maybe not at all & Madden a 3C maybe 2C if he excels a big IF. Therefore neither would be a fit as the roster stands or with other prospects in the pipeline.

    So a no


    Pretty odd we both said essentially the same thing at the same time...
    remowilliams a aimé ceci.
    23 juill. 2020 à 6 h 8
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 14,042
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
    Quoting: AnyoneButTheBruins
    Alright let's say for instance would you trade the 10th overall pick for the 20th overall pick and a 3rd? I wouldn't. Now would you trade that 10th overall that has developed handsomely for one player that has developed at par of where he was drafted and B prospect. No again IMO. Also, I get what you are saying about the comment above, but it is late at night so I felt lazy with that comment and I do apologize. I normally do like to put in some actual feedback.


    Madden turned out better than expected, Kupari is still a question mark. The answer is no, of course, but it’s not THAT bad
    23 juill. 2020 à 12 h 35
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 9,721
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
    Quoting: GMs
    Madden turned out better than expected, Kupari is still a question mark. The answer is no, of course, but it’s not THAT bad


    People say Madden was the best player in the NCAA this year.
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage