SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Options at LD

Créé par: Wadejos123
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 22 juill. 2020
Publié: 22 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Within the next year we are going to need to find a top 4 LD to replace kieth. Some options listed below that I think could help will the spot. Some of the younger guys would obviously be a year or two away from taking over a top 4 role, but guys like dehaan could definetly at least be a stop gap. What should the Hawks do?

Brodin- Probably our best bet if we want a replacement right away for 2020. Strome would have to go back the other way, but Brodin could instatntly take over the top pair

Lindholm- Another good option in my opinion but possibly not worth it because it would cost a lot in a trade to give up for a guy that could walk in 2 years (i probably didn't give enough in my trade proposal for him)

Krug- I think we need to stay away from Krug in free agecny even if we could find a way to afford him

Sanderson- In my opinion our best option if we don't get Brodin. He is probably a year or two away, but he has the top pair shutdown D potential

Beaudan/Carlson- We could just go the route of waiting to see how these guys develop

Other options not mentioned could be Dunn, Sergachev, etc.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
78 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Sanderson, Jake
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Brodin, Jonas
Détails additionnels:
Extension
MIN
  1. Strome, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
2.
ANA
  1. Mitchell, Ian
  2. Nylander, Alexander
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
681 500 000 $23 978 984 $1 090 244 $82 500 $57 521 016 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Sanderson, Jake
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 1
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
880 833 $880 833 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 juill. 2020 à 9 h 50
#1
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Needs to be someone better than Nylander in that Lindholm trade. Guy is a stud.
22 juill. 2020 à 9 h 52
#2
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,661
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Huge overpayment for Lindholm imo, I'd rather just draft and develop Sanderson. Trading Mitchell seems like a huge mistake at this point
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2020 à 9 h 55
#3
MNBassman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 8,142
Mentions "j'aime": 3,571
My (personal) line in the sand would be: Brodin with an extension for Strome and Chicago’s 2020 2nd.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2020 à 9 h 55
#4
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,629
Mentions "j'aime": 9,729
Quoting: MNBassman
My (personal) line in the sand would be: Brodin with an extension for Strome and Chicago’s 2020 2nd.


Without extension drop the 2nd?
22 juill. 2020 à 9 h 58
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,279
Mentions "j'aime": 4,924
Quoting: MNBassman
My (personal) line in the sand would be: Brodin with an extension for Strome and Chicago’s 2020 2nd.


We have PIT's 2020 2nd, MTL has ours
22 juill. 2020 à 9 h 59
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,574
Mentions "j'aime": 5,453
If you need a third pair LD (or even RD), let me know, John Moore is available.
22 juill. 2020 à 10 h 6
#7
MNBassman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 8,142
Mentions "j'aime": 3,571
Quoting: Wadejos123
We have PIT's 2020 2nd, MTL has ours


My bad. I would require Pitt’s 2020 and Chicago’s 2021 2nd rounders. Whether that’s ridiculous or not, these would be my demands.
Jonas Brodin is a stud!
22 juill. 2020 à 10 h 8
#8
Drumman44
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 697
Mentions "j'aime": 259
Quoting: Lenny7
Needs to be someone better than Nylander in that Lindholm trade. Guy is a stud.


Lindholm is amazing. True #1 D. Blackhawk fans are hopeful that Mitchell will be our version of Colton Parayko, so that's actually a pretty generous package.
22 juill. 2020 à 10 h 18
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,279
Mentions "j'aime": 4,924
Quoting: MNBassman
My bad. I would require Pitt’s 2020 and Chicago’s 2021 2nd rounders. Whether that’s ridiculous or not, these would be my demands.
Jonas Brodin is a stud!


There's no team in the league paying anything close in value to Strome plus 2 2nd's, but then again I guess when they don't you just keep him. Just hope he doesn't walk in FA and hope that you can work a deal for Seattle to not take him
MNBassman a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2020 à 10 h 20
#10
MNBassman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 8,142
Mentions "j'aime": 3,571
Quoting: Wadejos123
There's no team in the league paying anything close in value to Strome plus 2 2nd's, but then again I guess when they don't you just keep him. Just hope he doesn't walk in FA and hope that you can work a deal for Seattle to not take him


It’s potentially 2 late 2nd rounders so i dont think it’s a ridiculous ask, but either way, i would be happy with the return, or ecstatic if he stayed.
22 juill. 2020 à 10 h 21
#11
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: DrumMan44
Lindholm is amazing. True #1 D. Blackhawk fans are hopeful that Mitchell will be our version of Colton Parayko, so that's actually a pretty generous package.


"Hopeful" being the key word.

Mitchell is a good addition to the trade. Nylander is a huge question mark, and the 2021 1st is an even bigger question mark. How much do I want to gamble on that draft? There's a good chance that there's no junior hockey until at least December, and an even better chance that there's none at all. The fact that the talent pool doesn't even come close to this years adds to the dilemma. And then there's a good shot that it ends up being a late 1st, since you've made additions to the team.

So, a late 1st+a questionable prospect+A good prospect. I'd have to say no, it's just too big of a risk.
22 juill. 2020 à 10 h 40
#12
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,643
Mentions "j'aime": 12,365
Crazy to trade Mitchell.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2020 à 11 h 18
#13
Drumman44
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 697
Mentions "j'aime": 259
Quoting: Lenny7

So, a late 1st+a questionable prospect+A good prospect. I'd have to say no, it's just too big of a risk.


That's fine and you're right to want to hold onto Lindholm. I just wanted to point out that Mitchell is by no means a throw in and is the main piece of the trade
22 juill. 2020 à 11 h 37
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,026
Mentions "j'aime": 9,322
Quoting: MNBassman
My bad. I would require Pitt’s 2020 and Chicago’s 2021 2nd rounders. Whether that’s ridiculous or not, these would be my demands.
Jonas Brodin is a stud!


You aren't getting (2) 2nd rounders plus Strome for Brodin; that's a big overpayment...especially without a extension. Without an extension, there is no way Chicago considers a trade for Brodin. With a extension, it's strome and a 3rd or MAYBE a 2nd. The Wild will not only save cap space with Strome, but have a 23 year old they now own the career rights...meaning...they bridge him and reup his contract again as a RFA. Strome has a fair amount of upside, Brodin is close to reaching his peak in his career.
22 juill. 2020 à 11 h 39
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,026
Mentions "j'aime": 9,322
No way should we trade Mitchell, Nylander and a 1st for 2 years of Lindholm and then he goes to UFA status. Lindholm is a great player, but the Hawks aren't making a cup run next year IMO and therefore this would be a huge mistake. Mitchell is a stud and potentially he could be better then Boqvist.
Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2020 à 11 h 53
#16
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: DrumMan44
That's fine and you're right to want to hold onto Lindholm. I just wanted to point out that Mitchell is by no means a throw in and is the main piece of the trade


For sure, I'm just really not sold on Nylander.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage