Quoting: Isles777
Devon Toews signed a 2 year one way deal when he was 24 yo (same age as Aho). That 2 year deal meant that he would still be an RFA at the age of 26 (this offseason). After toews signed that deal, he was sent to Bridgeport after camp. So if Aho signs that same deal, he doesn't require waivers I guess.
I saw that article in the athletic - bellows will be a regular this season so if he plays well he will end up being protected. I wouldn't mind if Seattle took Bailey, but I feel like they would opt for younger players or an older guy with less term.
It's not rocket science. Look at the
Waiver FAQ here.
Toews was 22 when he signed his ELC, so he gets 3 years or 70 NHL games of waiver eligibility from when he signed his contract (April 15, 2016). Therefore he was waiver exempt for the 2016-17, 2017-18, and 2018-19 seasons, but not this season.
Aho signed his ELC at age 21 (July 5, 2017), meaning he gets 3 years or 80 NHL games of waiver eligibility. That means he would have been exempt for the 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20 seasons (hence why he still shows as waiver eligible now). However, once this season ends and next season starts (October 31, 2020), Aho will no longer be waiver exempt and will have to clear if he is demoted to the AHL.
If Bellows is protected, they'll have to leave one of the other forwards exposed. Barzal, Eberle, Lee, Nelson, Cizikas, Pageau, Beauvillier. Exactly which of those guys would be passed over in favor of Aho?