SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Frank Sinatra is the Best Musical Artist of All Time

Équipe: 2020-21 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 15 juill. 2020
Publié: 15 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
55 500 000 $
32 750 000 $
41 850 000 $
1900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Lafreniere, Alexis
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (STL)
OTT
  1. Skinner, Hunter [Liste de réserve]
  2. Smith, Brendan
2.
3.
NYR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
SJS
  1. Strome, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
4.
NYR
  1. Kamenev, Vladislav [Droits de RFA]
5.
STL
  1. Howden, Brett
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (DAL)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de CAR
Logo de SJS
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de STL
Logo de NYR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de NYR
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $72 808 133 $0 $8 862 500 $8 691 867 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 2
Lafreniere, Alexis
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 475 000 $1 475 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
900 000 $900 000 $
C
UFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
900 000 $900 000 $
AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 juill. 2020 à 21 h 1
#1
Servant of Chaos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 1,108
Mentions "j'aime": 450
OTT, SJS, and COL trades look like good value to me for both teams (assuming OTT trade is after Smith's bonuses are paid). CAR likely turns down that trade unless the Rangers add, but I'd like to get Bean from them if a fair deal is there to be made.

STL I don't know nearly enough about Barbashev to make the call on
15 juill. 2020 à 21 h 2
#2
Démarrer sujet
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,520
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: FreeTacosAreBestTacos
OTT, SJS, and COL trades look like good value to me for both teams (assuming OTT trade is after Smith's bonuses are paid). CAR likely turns down that trade unless the Rangers add, but I'd like to get Bean from them if a fair deal is there to be made.

STL I don't know nearly enough about Barbashev to make the call on


I'm willing to add for Bean. I like his potential. Barbashev is a very underrated player. does all the little things with PK, good defensive center, just what we need.
15 juill. 2020 à 21 h 3
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,188
Mentions "j'aime": 2,123
ya know, as a dude who did choir in high school, all my friends would blabber about how "Frank Sinatra was a very technically deficient singer, he was all performance but his sound was shallow" like bruh shut up I dont care hes got some boppin songs relax
15 juill. 2020 à 21 h 5
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 1,769
Mentions "j'aime": 491
Not sure if Blues do it or not. Seems like a wash but honestly I’m not familiar with Howden.
15 juill. 2020 à 21 h 8
#5
Démarrer sujet
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,520
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: BluesBandit
Not sure if Blues do it or not. Seems like a wash but honestly I’m not familiar with Howden.


Howden is young and has some upside but seems to be falling out of favor here. Just an idea I like what Barbashev brings from losing Fast.
15 juill. 2020 à 21 h 8
#6
Démarrer sujet
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,520
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: SlickWilly
ya know, as a dude who did choir in high school, all my friends would blabber about how "Frank Sinatra was a very technically deficient singer, he was all performance but his sound was shallow" like bruh shut up I dont care hes got some boppin songs relax

LOL. all his songs are bangers. like literally everyone.
SlickWilly a aimé ceci.
15 juill. 2020 à 21 h 17
#7
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,844
Mentions "j'aime": 8,548
😕
15 juill. 2020 à 21 h 29
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,271
Mentions "j'aime": 581
Dude keep politics off this site
15 juill. 2020 à 21 h 44
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
I think you spelled "Smashmouth" wrong
16 juill. 2020 à 1 h 22
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,261
Mentions "j'aime": 703
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
I think you spelled "Smashmouth" wrong


Smashmouth wasn't an artist... they were a movement...
16 juill. 2020 à 3 h 22
#11
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 28,461
Mentions "j'aime": 11,074
Quoting: BluesBandit
Not sure if Blues do it or not. Seems like a wash but honestly I’m not familiar with Howden.



He's one of the worst forwards in the league. We laugh and hang up at this nonsense.
16 juill. 2020 à 5 h 40
#12
Démarrer sujet
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,520
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: Jesus
Dude keep politics off this site


Politics?
16 juill. 2020 à 5 h 40
#13
Démarrer sujet
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,520
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
I think you spelled "Smashmouth" wrong

Never heard of em so my opinion stands!tears of joy
16 juill. 2020 à 5 h 41
#14
Démarrer sujet
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,520
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: mokumboi
He's one of the worst forwards in the league. We laugh and hang up at this nonsense.

Young C. Gotta think there is some upside left in em.
16 juill. 2020 à 5 h 41
#15
Démarrer sujet
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,520
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: MaxDomi13
😕

My guy?
16 juill. 2020 à 6 h 16
#16
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 28,461
Mentions "j'aime": 11,074
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Young C. Gotta think there is some upside left in em.



Awesome. It'll be fun to see how he develops for you. smile
16 juill. 2020 à 6 h 18
#17
Démarrer sujet
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,520
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: mokumboi
Awesome. It'll be fun to see how he develops for you. smile


lmao I feel you. Just an idea my guytears of joy . Testing the waters is the prerogative In all these posts eh?
mokumboi a aimé ceci.
16 juill. 2020 à 9 h 42
#18
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,576
Mentions "j'aime": 4,615
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Howden is young and has some upside but seems to be falling out of favor here. Just an idea I like what Barbashev brings from losing Fast.


Howden literally has THE WORST possession stats (CF% and FF%) out of all forwards in the entire league who played at least 50 games this season.
16 juill. 2020 à 9 h 43
#19
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,576
Mentions "j'aime": 4,615
Carolina decline this easily. Anderson doesn't have a lot of value right now.
16 juill. 2020 à 12 h 16
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,271
Mentions "j'aime": 581
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Politics?


I was joking. Also you spelled The Beatles wrong
16 juill. 2020 à 13 h 3
#21
Démarrer sujet
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,520
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: Jesus
I was joking. Also you spelled The Beatles wrong


Matter of taste. At least you didn't say Elvis.
TheGuyInTheChair a aimé ceci.
16 juill. 2020 à 16 h 14
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: BroadwayBlueshirts
Smashmouth wasn't an artist... they were a movement...


Smashmouth is a way of life
BroadwayBlueshirts a aimé ceci.
16 juill. 2020 à 16 h 19
#23
torontos finest
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,546
Mentions "j'aime": 11,169
Quoting: Jesus
I was joking. Also you spelled The Beatles wrong


The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved. In a sense, the Beatles are emblematic of the status of rock criticism as a whole: too much attention paid to commercial phenomena (be it grunge or U2) and too little to the merits of real musicians. If somebody composes the most divine music but no major label picks him up and sells him around the world, a lot of rock critics will ignore him. If a major label picks up a musician who is as stereotyped as can be but launches her or him worldwide, your average critic will waste rivers of ink on her or him. This is the sad status of rock criticism: rock critics are basically publicists working for major labels, distributors and record stores. They simply highlight what product the music business wants to make money from.

Hopefully, one not-too-distant day, there will be a clear demarcation between a great musician like Tim Buckley, who never sold much, and commercial products like the Beatles. At such a time, rock critics will study their rock history and understand which artists accomplished which musical feat, and which simply exploited it commercially.

Beatles' "Aryan" music removed any trace of black music from rock and roll. It replaced syncopated African rhythm with linear Western melody, and lusty negro attitudes with cute white-kid smiles.

Contemporary musicians never spoke highly of the Beatles, and for good reason. They could never figure out why the Beatles' songs should be regarded more highly than their own. They knew that the Beatles were simply lucky to become a folk phenomenon (thanks to "Beatlemania", which had nothing to do with their musical merits). That phenomenon kept alive interest in their (mediocre) musical endeavours to this day. Nothing else grants the Beatles more attention than, say, the Kinks or the Rolling Stones. There was nothing intrinsically better in the Beatles' music. Ray Davies of the Kinks was certainly a far better songwriter than Lennon & McCartney. The Stones were certainly much more skilled musicians than the 'Fab Four'. And Pete Townshend was a far more accomplished composer, capable of entire operas such as "Tommy" and "Quadrophenia"; not to mention the far greater British musicians who followed them in subsequent decades or the US musicians themselves who initially spearheaded what the Beatles merely later repackaged to the masses.

The Beatles sold a lot of records not because they were the greatest musicians but simply because their music was easy to sell to the masses: it had no difficult content, it had no technical innovations, it had no creative depth. They wrote a bunch of catchy 3-minute ditties and they were photogenic. If somebody had not invented "Beatlemania" in 1963, you would not have wasted five minutes of your time reading these pages about such a trivial band.
16 juill. 2020 à 16 h 55
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,271
Mentions "j'aime": 581
Quoting: mondo
The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved. In a sense, the Beatles are emblematic of the status of rock criticism as a whole: too much attention paid to commercial phenomena (be it grunge or U2) and too little to the merits of real musicians. If somebody composes the most divine music but no major label picks him up and sells him around the world, a lot of rock critics will ignore him. If a major label picks up a musician who is as stereotyped as can be but launches her or him worldwide, your average critic will waste rivers of ink on her or him. This is the sad status of rock criticism: rock critics are basically publicists working for major labels, distributors and record stores. They simply highlight what product the music business wants to make money from.

Hopefully, one not-too-distant day, there will be a clear demarcation between a great musician like Tim Buckley, who never sold much, and commercial products like the Beatles. At such a time, rock critics will study their rock history and understand which artists accomplished which musical feat, and which simply exploited it commercially.

Beatles' "Aryan" music removed any trace of black music from rock and roll. It replaced syncopated African rhythm with linear Western melody, and lusty negro attitudes with cute white-kid smiles.

Contemporary musicians never spoke highly of the Beatles, and for good reason. They could never figure out why the Beatles' songs should be regarded more highly than their own. They knew that the Beatles were simply lucky to become a folk phenomenon (thanks to "Beatlemania", which had nothing to do with their musical merits). That phenomenon kept alive interest in their (mediocre) musical endeavours to this day. Nothing else grants the Beatles more attention than, say, the Kinks or the Rolling Stones. There was nothing intrinsically better in the Beatles' music. Ray Davies of the Kinks was certainly a far better songwriter than Lennon & McCartney. The Stones were certainly much more skilled musicians than the 'Fab Four'. And Pete Townshend was a far more accomplished composer, capable of entire operas such as "Tommy" and "Quadrophenia"; not to mention the far greater British musicians who followed them in subsequent decades or the US musicians themselves who initially spearheaded what the Beatles merely later repackaged to the masses.

The Beatles sold a lot of records not because they were the greatest musicians but simply because their music was easy to sell to the masses: it had no difficult content, it had no technical innovations, it had no creative depth. They wrote a bunch of catchy 3-minute ditties and they were photogenic. If somebody had not invented "Beatlemania" in 1963, you would not have wasted five minutes of your time reading these pages about such a trivial band.


If you actually took the time to write that I'm impressed. I think arguing about music is pretty pointless its kinda like arguing about food, if someone doesn't like salmon there's not much you can do to convince them its good.
16 juill. 2020 à 22 h 0
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,261
Mentions "j'aime": 703
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Smashmouth is a way of life


Smashmouth is love, Smashmouth is life.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage