SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Minnesota

Créé par: Zephshockey64
Équipe: 2019-20 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 15 juill. 2020
Publié: 15 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
NYI
  1. Parise, Zach
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (MIN)
Détails additionnels:
Honestly this could be to much
2.
VAN
  1. Dumba, Matt
Détails additionnels:
Maybe a pick added on Minnesota end
3.
MIN
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (MTL)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de MIN
Logo de PIT
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2021
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $68 984 295 $0 $1 312 500 $12 515 705 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 625 000 $1 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 487 500 $1 487 500 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
916 666 $916 666 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 187 500 $5 187 500 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
700 000 $700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 juill. 2020 à 15 h 15
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 2,156
Mentions "j'aime": 521
That deal isn’t awful, but the Isles would need Minnesota to retain at least 2m on the contract. That said, that’s probably reason why this deal fell through last TDL.
15 juill. 2020 à 15 h 17
#2
Pass it to Lucic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,392
Mentions "j'aime": 467
MTL probably says no. Dont need another Center and Rask looks like he is a bottom 6 center. those arent really that hard to find and can be found for much cheaper then 4 million a year
15 juill. 2020 à 15 h 17
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 174
Mentions "j'aime": 68
I’m not an expert but I don’t think MTL need Rask
15 juill. 2020 à 15 h 36
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 951
Mentions "j'aime": 817
For 1, I really don't like the Parise trade. The only way I'd take a Ladd for Parise trade is if we get significant compensation in return. Ladd is no longer productive while Parise can still put up 50 pt. seasons. He just had a 60 pt season last year and he spent some time on the Injury List. Sure, his contract sucks, but I'd rather take a productive Parise over Ladd any day.

Secondly, we already already loaded on wingers. No need for Boeser. Would I love to have Boeser? Absolutely, but the makeup of our roster just doesn't justify adding him. Dumba+ for a 1C makes for sense if he's on the move.

EDIT: I realize how confusing the injury list comment is. What I meant was, Parise was able to still hit the 60 pt. plateau even though he couldn't play a full 82 game slate.
15 juill. 2020 à 15 h 57
#5
2018 Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 2,172
Mentions "j'aime": 747
Quoting: mnwild1790
For 1, I really don't like the Parise trade. The only way I'd take a Ladd for Parise trade is if we get significant compensation in return. Ladd is no longer productive while Parise can still put up 50 pt. seasons. He just had a 60 pt season last year and he spent some time on the Injury List. Sure, his contract sucks, but I'd rather take a productive Parise over Ladd any day.

Secondly, we already already loaded on wingers. No need for Boeser. Would I love to have Boeser? Absolutely, but the makeup of our roster just doesn't justify adding him. Dumba+ for a 1C makes for sense if he's on the move.

EDIT: I realize how confusing the injury list comment is. What I meant was, Parise was able to still hit the 60 pt. plateau even though he couldn't play a full 82 game slate.


Getting a 1C is virtually impossible & a lot more than Dumba+.

On Boeser though not on the market a RW scorer would be a big add & cost Dumba+.
mnwild1790 a aimé ceci.
15 juill. 2020 à 16 h 10
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 951
Mentions "j'aime": 817
Quoting: Nighthawk
Getting a 1C is virtually impossible & a lot more than Dumba+.

On Boeser though not on the market a RW scorer would be a big add & cost Dumba+.


Oh I agree on both comments. I was just pointing out why the trade wouldn't be a good idea from our side. But you're right, it doesn't make sense from your side as well. Plus I believe Benning said he's not getting moved
Nighthawk a aimé ceci.
15 juill. 2020 à 16 h 19
#7
2018 Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 2,172
Mentions "j'aime": 747
Modifié 15 juill. 2020 à 16 h 25
Quoting: mnwild1790
Oh I agree on both comments. I was just pointing out why the trade wouldn't be a good idea from our side. But you're right, it doesn't make sense from your side as well. Plus I believe Benning said he's not getting moved


All true but again it’s not happening now but it could be in the future.

Much depends on how Podkolzin & Hoglander pan out along with if Toffoli resigns. The future can change Boesers fate due to the top 6-9 can be very deep in 2yrs

A hometown boy puts a bow on it if itcame to be.
mnwild1790 a aimé ceci.
15 juill. 2020 à 16 h 34
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 951
Mentions "j'aime": 817
Quoting: Nighthawk
All true but again it’s not happening now but it could be in the future.

Much depends on how Podkolzin & Hoglander pan out along with if Toffoli resigns. The future can change Boesers fate due to the top 6-9 can be very deep in 2yrs

A hometown boy puts a bow on it if came to be.


Once again I 100% agree. The current makeup of the Wild says no to this trade but maybe in a couple of years a winger is what we need, not a center. Then a trade like this makes more sense
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage