SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Radical Rebuild

Créé par: Gordon_Bombay
Équipe: 2020-21 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 14 juill. 2020
Publié: 14 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This team would be terrible, but they have no expensive players to resign and would go through 1 year of pain and then they can grow for 3 years.

Free Cap in Season +1 = 14.91 (to resign Steel, Heinen and Jones should be enough I think)
Free Cap in Season +2= 12.625
Free Cap in Season +3= 11.5

Other than me being crazy and radical once again, how do you see the values of those trades?

I think the Rangers would be happy with another good centre at that cap

The habs would get a good player, while getting rid of Alzner

Vancouver would get cap space they really need. especially next season

the Pens a cheap good winger to keep the Crosby, Malkin window alive

Buffalo could solve their 2nd line centre problem

and Dallas could reduce cap, while also becoming on of the very best top 4 Ds in the NHL
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 300 000 $
21 500 000 $
33 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
NYR
  1. Getzlaf, Ryan (4 125 000 $ retained)
2.
ANA
  1. Alzner, Karl
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (MTL)
3.
ANA
  1. Baertschi, Sven
  2. Eriksson, Loui
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (VAN)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
VAN
4.
ANA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
5.
ANA
  1. Ladd, Andrew
  2. Wahlstrom, Oliver
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
NYI
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (VAN)
6.
ANA
  1. Mittelstadt, Casey [Droits de RFA]
  2. Okposo, Kyle
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
7.
ANA
  1. Cogliano, Andrew
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Manson, Josh (2 050 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de ANA
Logo de CHI
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de VAN
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYI
Logo de BUF
Logo de ANA
Logo de MTL
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BUF
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $77 848 610 $0 $537 500 $3 651 390 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 366 666 $3 366 666 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 juill. 2020 à 6 h 38
#1
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
1 year of pain? tears of joy This franchise would be doomed for a decade. So-Cal becomes the Buffalo of the West. You might as well trade Gibby and Hampus too, and free this from this death sentence you just gave the organization.
14 juill. 2020 à 6 h 47
#2
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,595
Mentions "j'aime": 6,727
Feel like someone would do that for Getzlaf but it's not NYR
Gordon_Bombay a aimé ceci.
14 juill. 2020 à 6 h 48
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,057
Mentions "j'aime": 587
Quoting: Lenny7
1 year of pain? tears of joy This franchise would be doomed for a decade. So-Cal becomes the Buffalo of the West. You might as well trade Gibby and Hampus too, and free this from this death sentence you just gave the organization.


Why do you think so? The Ducks are already one of the worst teams in the league. Every team is losing a player next season and the Ducks would be one of those teams who would not really lose any value. Also, they could use on of their draft picks to get a players other teams don't want to protect and could really load up draft picks.

They were bad last season and bad this season, so why not just break everything down. This team is going nowhere
14 juill. 2020 à 6 h 53
#4
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Gordon_Bombay
Why do you think so? The Ducks are already one of the worst teams in the league. Every team is losing a player next season and the Ducks would be one of those teams who would not really lose any value. Also, they could use on of their draft picks to get a players other teams don't want to protect and could really load up draft picks.

They were bad last season and bad this season, so why not just break everything down. This team is going nowhere


I don't know, I'm of the opinion that you add a top 4 RHD, and a scoring threat up front to take some of the pressure off of the younger guys, and all of the sudden you're a threat to make the playoffs again. Gibby can steal a lot of games, and is one of the top goalies in the league, but I wouldn't put him in the situation posted above. If you're ripping it apart, you might as well rip the roots out as well, because that's what's going to net you the biggest return (I do not endorse ripping it apart...).
14 juill. 2020 à 7 h 11
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,057
Mentions "j'aime": 587
Quoting: Lenny7
I don't know, I'm of the opinion that you add a top 4 RHD, and a scoring threat up front to take some of the pressure off of the younger guys, and all of the sudden you're a threat to make the playoffs again. Gibby can steal a lot of games, and is one of the top goalies in the league, but I wouldn't put him in the situation posted above. If you're ripping it apart, you might as well rip the roots out as well, because that's what's going to net you the biggest return (I do not endorse ripping it apart...).


Well, a Top 4 RHD and a scoring threat are coming at a price too and I am not if they would make the playoffs like that. I agree with Gibson, but he is not old yet and it cannot be much worse than it is now for him.
14 juill. 2020 à 7 h 32
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,139
Mentions "j'aime": 5,943
You might be able to get 2 seconds for silf without taking Alzner, easily get a 1st ++ for taking Alzner AND giving Silf

You get more than that if you take on Eriksson especially in division

Rakell fetches more than a (Presumably) late 1st

Ladd doesnt cost more than Alzner and Eriksson to dump

Not a fan of the Henrique trade at all

Don't hate the Manson and Getz deals though I dont see them happening

"Dallas could reduce cap, while also becoming on of the very best top 4 Ds in the NHL"
They player Manson is now probably doest play in DALs top 4 tbh they dont really need him, 2017 Manson yes, 2020 Manson no

Overall I get what you were trying to do but I think you arent getting enough value back with most of these if they did happen or at least you dont need to take on bad contracts to get the value of some of these players
14 juill. 2020 à 7 h 56
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: Gordon_Bombay
Why do you think so? The Ducks are already one of the worst teams in the league. Every team is losing a player next season and the Ducks would be one of those teams who would not really lose any value. Also, they could use on of their draft picks to get a players other teams don't want to protect and could really load up draft picks.

They were bad last season and bad this season, so why not just break everything down. This team is going nowhere


ANA has already started the rebuild. They did that buying out Perry, Kesler on LTIR and after next year Getzlaf contract will be off the book too along with Backes and Guddy.

They are gonna clear a lot of cap space after next year. And of course have some picks in early rounds.
The only older players really there are Henrique, and Silfverberg. Their contracts going till they are 34 so not too bad.

If they were going to move guys it would be them. But why? They would only return late 1st round picks. It's not worth moving them.
14 juill. 2020 à 7 h 58
#8
HutsonNorlinderGuhle
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 2,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,377
Habs are not giving up that much for anything other than a number 1 center
14 juill. 2020 à 8 h 10
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,057
Mentions "j'aime": 587
Quoting: Salzy
You might be able to get 2 seconds for silf without taking Alzner, easily get a 1st ++ for taking Alzner AND giving Silf

You get more than that if you take on Eriksson especially in division

Rakell fetches more than a (Presumably) late 1st

Ladd doesnt cost more than Alzner and Eriksson to dump

Not a fan of the Henrique trade at all

Don't hate the Manson and Getz deals though I dont see them happening

"Dallas could reduce cap, while also becoming on of the very best top 4 Ds in the NHL"
They player Manson is now probably doest play in DALs top 4 tbh they dont really need him, 2017 Manson yes, 2020 Manson no

Overall I get what you were trying to do but I think you arent getting enough value back with most of these if they did happen or at least you dont need to take on bad contracts to get the value of some of these players


I don't disagree with you. I just rather start a discussion with getting not enough, rather than doing crazy things.

I think you are right with Rakell, proabably should include a solid prospect or so as well, but it seems to me that Rakell would be a player Pittsburgh would like.

I was thinking that Ladd would get more because his contract is longer.

What do you dislike about the Henrique trade specifically?

And yes, I don't think this will happen either, but I'd rather do that then not being competitive for some years and wait till no value is left in the veterans like Detroit did
14 juill. 2020 à 8 h 12
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,057
Mentions "j'aime": 587
Quoting: HabsFan9
Habs are not giving up that much for anything other than a number 1 center


Tell me in which world you are getting a nr. 1 centre for two second round picks + a cap dump?
Salzy a aimé ceci.
14 juill. 2020 à 8 h 17
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,139
Mentions "j'aime": 5,943
Quoting: Gordon_Bombay
I don't disagree with you. I just rather start a discussion with getting not enough, rather than doing crazy things.

I think you are right with Rakell, proabably should include a solid prospect or so as well, but it seems to me that Rakell would be a player Pittsburgh would like.

I was thinking that Ladd would get more because his contract is longer.

What do you dislike about the Henrique trade specifically?

And yes, I don't think this will happen either, but I'd rather do that then not being competitive for some years and wait till no value is left in the veterans like Detroit did


I see what Zucker got and I see that as the floor of Rakells Value

I think they would just bury Ladd before paying that price, if that is the cost of dumping him (could be)

Less than 0 interest in Middlestat honestly, a 1st a third and Okposo is an underwhelming return to me. Yeah that might be his value but it doesnt really get me excited. To be fair I've been watching Henrique for 15 years when he played for my local junior team so I definitely value him more than what he's worth. but I think he could fetch a 1st by himself a third and Middlestat for taking Okposo is meh
Gordon_Bombay a aimé ceci.
14 juill. 2020 à 8 h 23
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,057
Mentions "j'aime": 587
Quoting: Salzy
I see what Zucker got and I see that as the floor of Rakells Value

I think they would just bury Ladd before paying that price, if that is the cost of dumping him (could be)

Less than 0 interest in Middlestat honestly, a 1st a third and Okposo is an underwhelming return to me. Yeah that might be his value but it doesnt really get me excited. To be fair I've been watching Henrique for 15 years when he played for my local junior team so I definitely value him more than what he's worth. but I think he could fetch a 1st by himself a third and Middlestat for taking Okposo is meh


I think the Isels are a very competitive team right now, but with litte cap space, so I don't know.

Aha I see, me on the other hand still see a lot of upside in Mittelstadt, even if he did not do much far. But there again, I could see him getting a bigger return. But the need in Buffalo would be there I think
Salzy a aimé ceci.
14 juill. 2020 à 9 h 2
#13
Islanders Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 7,829
Mentions "j'aime": 2,760
That's a tad steep for Ladd. I would remove Wahlstrom and swap him for a lesser prospect. Maybe Sebastian Aho or Otto Koivula. Arthur Staple speculated Ladd could be on Robidas Island/LTIR next season. So it may be Boychuk or something the Isles try to ditch in a similar move
Gordon_Bombay a aimé ceci.
14 juill. 2020 à 9 h 49
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
laugh laugh Benning isn't giving up a 1st to move Eriksson's contract. Probably Demko would be attached to him. Fat chance that Lou gives up both Wahlstrom and a 1st to move Ladd and Getzlaf isn't waiving so not happening, No freaking way you're getting 5 1st round picks for any of those deals those aren't cash strapped teams you're dealing with other then possibly Vancouver because of bad signings from jim Benning.
15 juill. 2020 à 17 h 55
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 325
Mentions "j'aime": 129
What in the holy hell are the Ducks supposed to do with NINE first rounders and FOUR second rounders over the next two seasons? Might as well trade away the rest of our picks because there literally won't be room in the organization for all of them. Never mind how unnecessarily awful this team will be for half a decade. AND capped out!
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage