SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Boeser divisional trade

Créé par: Kresco
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 13 juill. 2020
Publié: 13 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Vancouver gets a solid def prospect Who is very cost controlled addressing their biggest need and allowing more cap for Hughes / pettersson contract extensions.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3725 000 $
21 150 000 $
63 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 750 000 $
21 750 000 $
32 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Gawdin, Glenn
  2. Välimäki, Juuso
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
2.
CGY
    Derek Ryan for a 2nd / 3rd rounder to a team that wants a serviceable bottom 6 C with great PK skills
    CAR
    1. Ryan, Derek
    Détails additionnels:
    For the record I don’t necessarily want to trade Ryan but need the cap To sign a back up goalie. This trade would be for any team
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    2021
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    2022
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2081 500 000 $72 865 833 $0 $32 500 $8 634 167 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
    C
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    AG, AD, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    733 333 $733 333 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 2
    #1
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,709
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
    Turn one of those 2nds a 1st. If VAN is dealing Boeser within division they're probably require a higher cost for him...no point making favors for rivals.
    13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 4
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Kresco
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 171
    Mentions "j'aime": 49
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Turn one of those 2nds a 1st. If VAN is dealing Boeser within division they're probably require a higher cost for him...no point making favors for rivals.


    Young top 4 defencemen are not cheap especially when trading in the division as well
    13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 6
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 38,293
    Mentions "j'aime": 19,540
    Paying more for Boeser then we would have for Stone?
    13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 9
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Kresco
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 171
    Mentions "j'aime": 49
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    Paying more for Boeser then we would have for Stone?


    Honesty I haven’t put a lot of thought into boeser until this as there was really never any reason to consider it. What would you offer? This was more of a testing the waters Post
    13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 10
    #5
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,709
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
    Quoting: Kresco
    Young top 4 defencemen are not cheap especially when trading in the division as well


    Legit Välimäki'd be the second finnish potential but injury riddled defenseman in Vancouver...they also have Juolevi in there you know.

    All things considered, I don't think they're that interested without 1st being included.
    13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 14
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Kresco
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 171
    Mentions "j'aime": 49
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Legit Välimäki'd be the second finnish potential but injury riddled defenseman in Vancouver...they also have Juolevi in there you know.

    All things considered, I don't think they're that interested without 1st being included.



    Fair point but valamaki is still projected as a very high potential and reality is boeser is also a worry with his health as well. Joulevi is closer to the side of a depth defencman at this point where valamaki’s potential is still quite high. The benefit for Vancouver would also be that they wouldn’t have to protect valamaki in the expansion draft
    13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 24
    #7
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,709
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
    Quoting: Kresco
    Fair point but valamaki is still projected as a very high potential and reality is boeser is also a worry with his health as well. Joulevi is closer to the side of a depth defencman at this point where valamaki’s potential is still quite high. The benefit for Vancouver would also be that they wouldn’t have to protect valamaki in the expansion draft


    Both of their potential is a question mark due to injuries. Välimäki has played below 50 games in 2018-19 and 2019-20 seasons combined, Juolevi just slightly over that.

    And btw if CGY uses Välimäki in this year's playoffs, he needs to be protected. That'd make this his second professional year, which means the next year would be his third and thus he wouldn't be exempt from being picked anymore.
    13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 26
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Kresco
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 171
    Mentions "j'aime": 49
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Both of their potential is a question mark due to injuries. Välimäki has played below 50 games in 2018-19 and 2019-20 seasons combined, Juolevi just slightly over that.

    And btw if CGY uses Välimäki in this year's playoffs, he needs to be protected. That'd make this his second professional year, which means the next year would be his third and thus he wouldn't be exempt from being picked anymore.


    I was aware of that but as valamaki hasn’t played at all this year and flames picked up an additional 2 defencmen at the deadline the chances of him playing are very slim even with Hamonic sitting out
    13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 36
    #9
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,709
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
    Quoting: Kresco
    I was aware of that but as valamaki hasn’t played at all this year and flames picked up an additional 2 defencmen at the deadline the chances of him playing are very slim even with Hamonic sitting out


    Depends on how he performs on the "training camp."

    He was supposed to be a regular NHL D this year.
    13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 49
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    Kresco
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 171
    Mentions "j'aime": 49
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Depends on how he performs on the "training camp."

    He was supposed to be a regular NHL D this year.


    So hypothetically if his injuries are behind him as a Vancouver fan hows the value? Having a guy like that and opening some cost control / cap space for boeser
    13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 52
    #11
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,709
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
    Quoting: Kresco
    So hypothetically if his injuries are behind him as a Vancouver fan hows the value? Having a guy like that and opening some cost control / cap space for boeser


    I'm no Nucks fan, but naturally a cost controlled asset sounds always good.

    Is it worth losing Boeser though? Ehh...not sure.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage