SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Some small moves

Créé par: crankshaft
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 13 juill. 2020
Publié: 13 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 225 000 $
33 475 000 $
1785 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
22 875 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Caggiula, Drake [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
CHI
  1. Blichfeld, Joachim
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. Paquette, Cédric
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (PHI)
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (TBL)
TBL
  1. Gambrell, Dylan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (WSH)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de PHI
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TBL
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $74 239 166 $0 $582 500 $7 260 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
2 225 000 $2 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 475 000 $3 475 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
785 000 $785 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 44
#1
Go Sharks Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 1,583
Mentions "j'aime": 656
overpay for Caggiula, Blichfeld has the potential to be better than Caggiula

slight overpay for Paquette imo but it's fine


as for the team I don't think Chmelevski is NHL ready and the top 9 is pretty weak
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 53
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
Quoting: JumboJoe
overpay for Caggiula, Blichfeld has the potential to be better than Caggiula

slight overpay for Paquette imo but it's fine


as for the team I don't think Chmelevski is NHL ready and the top 9 is pretty weak


I don't see it an an overpay for Caggiula. He performed very well for the hawks and they used him on almost every line and he seemed to excel everywhere. I think Chmelevski will make the team and he is not suited for a 4th line role. He is likely the future 3C and he can get some experience for a season playing on Paquette's wing.
13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 0
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: JumboJoe
overpay for Caggiula, Blichfeld has the potential to be better than Caggiula

slight overpay for Paquette imo but it's fine


as for the team I don't think Chmelevski is NHL ready and the top 9 is pretty weak


I see blichfield chmelevski chekovich as our 3rd line next year! I see all three being the top line in the AHL and I hope management keep them Merkely and Melnichuyk in the AHL this season season for the whole season no calling them up. That would prime them all For a 21/22 yea when we will have a breakout of youth once thornton and Marleau are finally done for sure.
Those 5 combined with One of Roy, Melones, pashniuyk And
And hopefully one of Gambrel kellman true or Gregor comming into their own and we have a nice youth infusion.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 0
#4
Go Sharks Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 1,583
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: crankshaft
I don't see it an an overpay for Caggiula. He performed very well for the hawks and they used him on almost every line and he seemed to excel everywhere. I think Chmelevski will make the team and he is not suited for a 4th line role. He is likely the future 3C and he can get some experience for a season playing on Paquette's wing.


Caggiula has never averaged over half a point per game in the NHL and he's already 26. Blichfeld averaged over .75 points per game in the AHL in his first season at the age of 21. A player like Caggiula should be very cheap.

I agree Chmelevski can be the future 3c, but he probably needs another year in the AHL.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 1
#5
Go Sharks Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 1,583
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I see blichfield chmelevski chekovich as our 3rd line next year! I see all three being the top line in the AHL and I hope management keep them Merkely and Melnichuyk in the AHL this season season for the whole season no calling them up. That would prime them all For a 21/22 yea when we will have a breakout of youth once thornton and Marleau are finally done for sure.
Those 5 combined with One of Roy, Melones, pashniuyk I’d
And hopefully one of Gambrel kellman true or Gregor comming up and we have a nice youth infusion.


I could see possibly Chmelevski or Blichfeld surprising in training camp and making the starting roster, but it isn't likely. as for Chekovich there's no way.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 7
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: JumboJoe
I could see possibly Chmelevski or Blichfeld surprising in training camp and making the starting roster, but it isn't likely. as for Chekovich there's no way.


You might be right but I’d love the three of them to play together in the AHL and gain some chemistry and build on their skill and talent rather than rush them up and potentially ruin their progress
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage