SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kaprizov

Créé par: Trickster
Équipe: 2020-21 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 13 juill. 2020
Publié: 13 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
If they can add a number 1 or number 2 C, oh man I'm loving this team.

Still want them to dump Dubnyk to team that needs a goalie for a year.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
22 250 000 $
32 555 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2700 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
43 000 000 $
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de MIN
Logo de PIT
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2021
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $69 962 758 $0 $925 000 $11 537 242 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 625 000 $1 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 487 500 $1 487 500 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 555 000 $2 555 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
925 000 $925 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
700 000 $700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 juill. 2020 à 12 h 58
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
I'm so happy. Plus, Creed Bratton had his interim coach tag removed. Huge day for the Wild.

Just need that 1C like you said. Hopefully Guerin can find a way to be creative since it seems like a lot of the ideas on here (Domi, Stromes, etc) have been beat to death
Trickster et OutCold13 a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2020 à 13 h 1
#2
Démarrer sujet
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,047
Mentions "j'aime": 3,752
Quoting: TanSor
I'm so happy. Plus, Creed Bratton had his interim coach tag removed. Huge day for the Wild.

Just need that 1C like you said. Hopefully Guerin can find a way to be creative since it seems like a lot of the ideas on here (Domi, Stromes, etc) have been beat to death


Domi is a winger as top6.
Might be a 3rd line C at best.

I want Cirelli on this team.
TanSor, OutCold13 et RazWild a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2020 à 13 h 1
#3
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,892
Mentions "j'aime": 8,559
First off Firstov was supposed to be the first one signed
13 juill. 2020 à 13 h 1
#4
Démarrer sujet
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,047
Mentions "j'aime": 3,752
Is Greenway accurate for 2nd line LW?
TanSor a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2020 à 13 h 3
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Quoting: Trickster
Is Greenway accurate for 2nd line LW?


He's apparently playing first line LW with Fiala to start the play-in round. I think he can be put anywhere to be honest.

Sucks we can't have Kaprizov for the play-in, I want to see him with Fiala so badly
JayTea, OutCold13 et Trickster a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2020 à 13 h 16
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,040
Mentions "j'aime": 658
Quoting: Trickster
Domi is a winger as top6.
Might be a 3rd line C at best.

I want Cirelli on this team.


Where is this "Domi isn't a centerman" thing coming from ? Cause the only people on here banging that drum seem to be TOR fans.

I've watched just about every game he's played since coming to MTL and he seems far more comfortable and dangerous at C imo.
13 juill. 2020 à 13 h 27
#7
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,539
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
Now the hardest part, finding that #1 C
TanSor et Trickster a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2020 à 13 h 47
#8
Hockey Fan13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,916
Mentions "j'aime": 2,487
Quoting: TanSor
I'm so happy. Plus, Creed Bratton had his interim coach tag removed. Huge day for the Wild.

Just need that 1C like you said. Hopefully Guerin can find a way to be creative since it seems like a lot of the ideas on here (Domi, Stromes, etc) have been beat to death


Glad I'm not the only one that sees Creed.
TanSor et Trickster a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2020 à 13 h 51
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,414
Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
Quoting: TanSor
He's apparently playing first line LW with Fiala to start the play-in round. I think he can be put anywhere to be honest.

Sucks we can't have Kaprizov for the play-in, I want to see him with Fiala so badly


I don't, I'd rather he play his preferred RW position and give a us a 1-2 punch in our top six. Fiala has the skill and ability to be our 1RW, Kaprizov should be our 2RW. Our top priorities are getting a 1C and fixing our goaltending, but bring in someone like Boeser in a separate trade to be Fiala's playmate there on the 1st line and this team could make some noise.
TanSor et Trickster a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 5
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Quoting: RazWild
I don't, I'd rather he play his preferred RW position and give a us a 1-2 punch in our top six. Fiala has the skill and ability to be our 1RW, Kaprizov should be our 2RW. Our top priorities are getting a 1C and fixing our goaltending, but bring in someone like Boeser in a separate trade to be Fiala's playmate there on the 1st line and this team could make some noise.


He played both in the KHL. He's primarily a RW but I saw him on the left in the 30 or so games I watched over 4 years.

Boeser is a pure RW. He may be able to play the left but I'd rather not try to force a square peg into a round hole. If you want a right shot LW, we should try to get Gusev
Trickster et MNBassman a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 24
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,649
Mentions "j'aime": 1,620
Quoting: RazWild
I don't, I'd rather he play his preferred RW position and give a us a 1-2 punch in our top six. Fiala has the skill and ability to be our 1RW, Kaprizov should be our 2RW. Our top priorities are getting a 1C and fixing our goaltending, but bring in someone like Boeser in a separate trade to be Fiala's playmate there on the 1st line and this team could make some noise.


Question, and this is very hypothetical, let’s say wild lose the play in round get 1oa, would they consider trading that pick to the kings for say th 2oa (byfield) and another prospect like Thomas? I don’t know if the kings would even do this or even the wild. I know byfield probably won’t make the jump immediately but maybe the following year? Just curious if this would even be possible
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 24
#12
Démarrer sujet
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,047
Mentions "j'aime": 3,752
Quoting: LumberJacques
Where is this "Domi isn't a centerman" thing coming from ? Cause the only people on here banging that drum seem to be TOR fans.

I've watched just about every game he's played since coming to MTL and he seems far more comfortable and dangerous at C imo.


I'd say based on how he does at faceoffs and his defensive game, that makes me feel he is best suited in top6 role as a winger.

He could play C in a pinch.
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 26
#13
Démarrer sujet
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,047
Mentions "j'aime": 3,752
Quoting: KINGS67
Question, and this is very hypothetical, let’s say wild lose the play in round get 1oa, would they consider trading that pick to the kings for say th 2oa (byfield) and another prospect like Thomas? I don’t know if the kings would even do this or even the wild. I know byfield probably won’t make the jump immediately but maybe the following year? Just curious if this would even be possible


No one, doesnt matter who gets it, is trading the 1st overall.
He is going to be generational player, you dont trade those.

I have feeling Kings are taking Stutzle.
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 29
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,649
Mentions "j'aime": 1,620
Quoting: Trickster
No one, doesnt matter who gets it, is trading the 1st overall.
He is going to be generational player, you dont trade those.

Was just a thought. I wouldn’t say never though. In my opinion, and this is a big IF, but if byfield hits on all cylinders he will be the best player coming out of this draft. One could dream though. I hope the kings draft byfield but I think they’ll go stutzle
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 35
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,208
Mentions "j'aime": 3,641
Quoting: KINGS67
Question, and this is very hypothetical, let’s say wild lose the play in round get 1oa, would they consider trading that pick to the kings for say th 2oa (byfield) and another prospect like Thomas? I don’t know if the kings would even do this or even the wild. I know byfield probably won’t make the jump immediately but maybe the following year? Just curious if this would even be possible


I'd just take Byfiled with 1oa.
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 39
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,649
Mentions "j'aime": 1,620
Quoting: wabit
I'd just take Byfiled with 1oa.

But you’d be getting the extra piece/pieces. I’d use that as leverage if I had the 1oa just to trade back 1 spot and still get an elite talent. But as everyone says, no one is trading the 1oa. Which I’ll be ok with because Kong’s will get a phenomenal player at 2. Was just a thoughT I had considering the wild are desperate for a center that would be literally sitting there at their finger tips, assuming they get 1oa of course.
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 44
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,040
Mentions "j'aime": 658
Quoting: Trickster
I'd say based on how he does at faceoffs and his defensive game, that makes me feel he is best suited in top6 role as a winger.

He could play C in a pinch.


I get that but would counter with the fact that most young centermen have struggles on the draw, that's just normal. Most who are good at faceoffs are usually in their late 20's or in their 30's.

When it comes to defensive games it's not like guys such as McDavid, Matthews, Barzal and Pettersson are elite defensively either but most people still see them as centerman more than wingers nonetheless.
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 44
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,414
Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
Quoting: KINGS67
Question, and this is very hypothetical, let’s say wild lose the play in round get 1oa, would they consider trading that pick to the kings for say th 2oa (byfield) and another prospect like Thomas? I don’t know if the kings would even do this or even the wild. I know byfield probably won’t make the jump immediately but maybe the following year? Just curious if this would even be possible


It's kinda a double-edged sword, do we go after the surefire generational talent LW or do we drop down and take our 1C of the future in Byfield. Byfield as much as he could lockdown this team's center depth in a year or two is a very viable approach, but ultimately doesn't move the needle where I'm concerned. Lafreniere is a generational talent and when combined with the offensive output of both Fiala and Kaprizov could put the Wild over the top.

So, as you can see, I tend to lean on the side of just picking Lafreniere.

But, to your question, no. It's gonna take more than just Thomas and 2nd OVA to move up. It's sorta cruel to say but no GM worth their salt is gonna give up the 1st OVA without a massive overpay.

My guess it'll probably take Vilardi, Madden, and the 2nd OVA to start the ball rolling on talks, maybe plus. Afterwhich, we still take Byfield with the 2nd OVA pick.
Trickster a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 47
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,414
Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
Quoting: wabit
I'd just take Byfiled with 1oa.


That's just idiotic. If we do want Byfield, we should just drop down for a haul and take him with the 2nd.
KINGS67 et Trickster a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 47
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,649
Mentions "j'aime": 1,620
Quoting: RazWild
It's kinda a double-edged sword, do we go after the surefire generational talent LW or do we drop down and take our 1C of the future in Byfield. Byfield as much as he could lockdown this team's center depth in a year or two is a very viable approach, but ultimately doesn't move the needle where I'm concerned. Lafreniere is a generational talent and when combined with the offensive output of both Fiala and Kaprizov could put the Wild over the top.

So, as you can see, I tend to lean on the side of just picking Lafreniere.

But, to your question, no. It's gonna take more than just Thomas and 2nd OVA to move up. It's sorta cruel to say but no GM worth their salt is gonna give up the 1st OVA without a massive overpay.

My guess it'll probably take Vilardi, Madden, and the 2nd OVA to start the ball rolling on talks, maybe plus. Afterwhich, we still take Byfield with the 2nd OVA pick.

Yeah, I’d pass on that if that’s the cost. I didn’t include a vilardi or a turcotte because you get that in byfield. But yeah, i was more curious than anything.
13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 14
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,208
Mentions "j'aime": 3,641
Quoting: RazWild
That's just idiotic. If we do want Byfield, we should just drop down for a haul and take him with the 2nd.


This isn't the NBA or the NFL. Why does LA want to give up much of anything to move up 1 spot?

Adding another wing when the center the team has needed forever is sitting right there is the idiotic thing.

There isn't much of a talent gap between the two players, and the center positional impact is much larger than that of a wing. Age matters too: Laf missed last year's draft by less then a month and Byfield is making this year's draft by less than a month.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage