SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Most realistic scenario next season part 3

Créé par: Rob32sjsharks
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 12 juill. 2020
Publié: 13 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is part 3 of my post.
Very simple this is the most realistic team
I see next year. Two simple trades pick up a few decent FA and hope for a revival of sorts from the old vets and a step
Up from the young kids.

Honestly I see this as a 6 seed to just out of the playoffs, but only if Jones bounces backs.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1776 000 $
1776 000 $
33 376 000 $
2776 000 $
2776 000 $
1776 000 $
2776 000 $
2776 000 $
2776 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1825 000 $
2925 000 $
33 350 000 $
1825 000 $
1825 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Stalock, Alex
Détails additionnels:
Stalock is the Most logical of the 3 goalies in min to be moved. He gets a lot more than I’m comfortable with because of his salary and play last year.
MIN
  1. Émond, Zacharie
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (ARI)
Détails additionnels:
Cup win trade clause
WSH
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (WSH)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de ARI
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $73 717 000 $0 $365 000 $7 783 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
3 350 000 $3 350 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
825 000 $825 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 376 000 $3 376 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
836 667 $836 667 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
776 000 $776 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 juill. 2020 à 8 h 37
#1
14m in dead cap
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 3,578
Mentions "j'aime": 3,058
Stalock isn't a logical goalie for the Wild to move. Dubnyk was horrible and is a buyout candidate, Stalock was good over a stretch when the Wild needed him and meets the expansion draft exposure requirement, and Kahkonen had a great 2 months in the AHL but otherwise looked average at best in the NHL last year in his cup of coffee with the team. He still might need time to develop and rushing him won't do anyone any good.
13 juill. 2020 à 9 h 17
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 1
I normally wouldn't lay into someone this hard but you called it "most realistic"

I don't understand these trades. We just give them a 2nd for a 3rd. Stalock is a statistically worse goalie than both Khudobin and Lehner and both are UFAs. Why would u trade for a worse goalie when you could just pay a free agent. Then lets say you dont get any of the ufa's you want why wouldnt you go after Antii Ranta or Darcey Keumper since they want to bring up Aiden Hill. Or PIttsburg who have Murray, Jarry, and DeSmith. Hell even Vancouver has Domingue and Demko and one of those 2 is out the door when Markstrom comes back from LTIR.
if you did want to trade for an NHL goalie the going price for a NHL'er is not a goalie prospect and a 3rd, thats nutty.

Also with Johnsson, if we wanted a guy who's had 1 20 goal season and a career high of 43 points why don't we just pick that up in free agency especially at a cap hit of 3.4mil easily done without the trade.

and for your most realistic lineup you bump out Gambrell at 4th line center for true who wasn't even our 1st call up guy. You also have Marleau playing 4th line left wing. No idea why our most realistic 4th line isn't Noeson, Gambrell, True.
13 juill. 2020 à 9 h 38
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 336
Mentions "j'aime": 152
Just fyi those are the wrong conditions on the Dillon trade if the caps win the stanley cup. The 2021 3rd becomes a 2020 coyotes 3rd owned by the caps.
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2020 à 12 h 9
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,155
Mentions "j'aime": 4,640
Quoting: JayTea
Stalock isn't a logical goalie for the Wild to move. Dubnyk was horrible and is a buyout candidate, Stalock was good over a stretch when the Wild needed him and meets the expansion draft exposure requirement, and Kahkonen had a great 2 months in the AHL but otherwise looked average at best in the NHL last year in his cup of coffee with the team. He still might need time to develop and rushing him won't do anyone any good.


That’s fair bit I don’t see any scenario where Kahk isn’t in the NHL next season so if dubnyk is bought out stalock isn’t available but if Your GM keeps Dubnyk this gets dicey
13 juill. 2020 à 12 h 57
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,155
Mentions "j'aime": 4,640
Quoting: Czar
I normally wouldn't lay into someone this hard but you called it "most realistic"

I don't understand these trades. We just give them a 2nd for a 3rd. Stalock is a statistically worse goalie than both Khudobin and Lehner and both are UFAs. Why would u trade for a worse goalie when you could just pay a free agent. Then lets say you dont get any of the ufa's you want why wouldnt you go after Antii Ranta or Darcey Keumper since they want to bring up Aiden Hill. Or PIttsburg who have Murray, Jarry, and DeSmith. Hell even Vancouver has Domingue and Demko and one of those 2 is out the door when Markstrom comes back from LTIR.
if you did want to trade for an NHL goalie the going price for a NHL'er is not a goalie prospect and a 3rd, thats nutty.

Also with Johnsson, if we wanted a guy who's had 1 20 goal season and a career high of 43 points why don't we just pick that up in free agency especially at a cap hit of 3.4mil easily done without the trade.

and for your most realistic lineup you bump out Gambrell at 4th line center for true who wasn't even our 1st call up guy. You also have Marleau playing 4th line left wing. No idea why our most realistic 4th line isn't Noeson, Gambrell, True.


Stalock is cheap 750k
If Khudobin or Lehnr are willing to come here on the cheap I jump otherwise we need to upgrade offense badly

Marleau is on the 4th and signed because sharks will use him to sell tickets and get the all time games played record in a sharks uni
No Gambrel cause he hasn’t earned it yet and true is a big body and we need that if not him then Handemark at 4C
I hope a few kids step up and push out the older guys but I’m not sold on anyone doing that this year.
Thornton Sorenson and Labanc cause they play well together

Johnson because he’s young fast skilled and has upside for a mid round pick he’ll yea I’m taking that,

Look if I could dump salary and pick up kids to redo this team I would but we’re stuck with a bunch of horrible contracts and very little money this works it leads to a better team than last year and doesn’t screw us going forward!
Rail into me all you want this make sense and fits within the cap and addresses most of our needs while not overspending or overextending
This is why I did a 3 part and if you look at my dream team I have a ton of kids and no Marleau or thornton.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage