SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Why this team is screwed cap wise if they dont move Burns

Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 12 juill. 2020
Publié: 12 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Let's be honest guys, Burns is the only one in Vlasic, Jones and EK who could be moved. I think that at his age (he's 35 now) he might realize that as much as he loves SJ (and I'm sure he REALLY does) he might want to go somewhere else to win something.

I know I made some Burns trade to ARI in the short term past and that's because I think he'd be a very good fit there. Cause let's be honest, OEL is a 50 pts d-man where as Burns is an elite offensive d-man who'd fit well in ARI... as for their cap they can move Stepan, Raanta, Goligoski and Demers to clear cap for Hall and Burns...

Now, as for their cap, if they don't move Burns, they only have 15 mil in cap room to improve their offensive depth (besides Labanc they still need a 3C (playing a 41 years old Joe as 3C isn't a recipe for success) and a scoring winger. With only 15 mil in cap room, resigning, say, Middleton, Thornton, Labanc (after all that they still have 9 ish mil in cap room) to get what I think they need to succeed.

Here's what I would do to move Burns to ARI
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 250 000 $
11 000 000 $
1900 000 $
14 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
55 500 000 $
11 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Kirk, Liam [Liste de réserve]
  2. Steenbergen, Tyler
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (ARI)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Lottery protected
ARI
  1. Burns, Brent (1 250 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de SJS
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de FLA
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $75 129 999 $0 $297 500 $6 370 001 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 juill. 2020 à 22 h 28
#1
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Sharks would want jenik
12 juill. 2020 à 22 h 33
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
They trade Burns and spend the money on Dadanov?
12 juill. 2020 à 22 h 36
#3
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,538
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
He has the nice ranch in Texas, DAL may be the only place he wants to go to.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
12 juill. 2020 à 22 h 37
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
I'd trade for EK 1000 times before trading for Burns
12 juill. 2020 à 22 h 43
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,072
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
So how does Arizona fit Burns even at 6.5m cap? Even if they could, Arizona has the trade leverage (Burns 3 team trade list) and can get him a lot cheaper from the cap desperate Sharks. But agree with Sharks are screwed with their cap on long term contract with aging players who have either NMCs or very restrictive M NTCs
12 juill. 2020 à 22 h 44
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Arizona can’t afford Burns even if the move Raanta Stepan Goligoski etc, they’ll have enough room for Hall only
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
12 juill. 2020 à 23 h 24
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
Sharks would want jenik


I think San Jose would be ignorant not to take this deal even without Jenik

Although if he were offered up, I'd take him in a heartbeat he's really good.
13 juill. 2020 à 0 h 15
#8
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
I think San Jose would be ignorant not to take this deal even without Jenik

Although if he were offered up, I'd take him in a heartbeat he's really good.


It would be jenik and a 2nd instead of steenbergen and a 1st
13 juill. 2020 à 0 h 29
#9
Log off the internet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 7,830
Mentions "j'aime": 3,865
Because then they can't spend over 6 million on Vatanen and Brassard?
13 juill. 2020 à 0 h 40
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
It would be jenik and a 2nd instead of steenbergen and a 1st


Accepted in a heartbeat.
13 juill. 2020 à 8 h 51
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,186
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
This team has more problems than just burns. 7 years left on Couture and EK, and 6 on Vlasic. Those contracts take them till they're 40. Plus Jones has a NMC with 4 years of almost 6 mil and he was awful last season. Burns contract is bad but it's better than all the other ones, but like you mentioned the other ones are pretty immovable.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage