SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Boeser trade idea

Créé par: WallStreet83
Équipe: 2019-20 Stars de Dallas
Date de création initiale: 11 juill. 2020
Publié: 11 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Is this fair?
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de BUF
2021
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
2022
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2581 500 000 $83 662 499 $932 500 $7 050 000 $-2 162 499 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 850 000 $9 850 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Stars de Dallas
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 750 000 $$2M)
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
811 667 $811 667 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Stars de Dallas
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 137 500 $2 137 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
737 500 $737 500 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 450 000 $$1M)
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 juill. 2020 à 18 h 40
#1
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,654
Mentions "j'aime": 23,800
I kind of like this for both teams . Only issue is Klingberg’s term
11 juill. 2020 à 18 h 44
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
They can't afford to take on that much money, They need to lockup Markstrom, Toffoli and Tanev that only saves the Nucks around $1.6 million in cap space.
11 juill. 2020 à 19 h 7
#3
Best In The World
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,272
Mentions "j'aime": 658
VAN decline, this still doesn't help with there cap situation
11 juill. 2020 à 19 h 13
#4
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,539
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
Probably the worst RD in hockey
11 juill. 2020 à 19 h 17
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,823
Mentions "j'aime": 1,117
Quoting: ItWasIn
Probably the worst RD in hockey


Can you elaborate because that is a pretty harsh statement.
11 juill. 2020 à 19 h 41
#6
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,539
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
Quoting: Phleb2
Can you elaborate because that is a pretty harsh statement.


Find a team with 3 worse RD than Johns, Polak and Fedun as proposed here, you may be looking a while
TheMooterus a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2020 à 19 h 44
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,823
Mentions "j'aime": 1,117
Quoting: ItWasIn
Find a team with 3 worse RD than Johns, Polak and Fedun as proposed here, you may be looking a while


Ah OK. I thought you were talking about Klingberg.
11 juill. 2020 à 19 h 55
#8
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,539
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
Quoting: Phleb2
Ah OK. I thought you were talking about Klingberg.


Nope!

If I were DAL I'd rather move Lindell than Klingberg, just because of thin that RD is. Boeser is a good target for them though.
TheMooterus a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2020 à 20 h 24
#9
True Reverse Retro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 4,623
Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
Quoting: ItWasIn
Nope!

If I were DAL I'd rather move Lindell than Klingberg, just because of thin that RD is. Boeser is a good target for them though.


THANK YOU! Everyone is making trades involving Klingberg without taking a look at how s***ty the remaining core of RD is for Dallas.

If Dallas trades a top-4 defenseman, it almost HAS to be Lindell. Unless someone is willing to give up a top-4 RD or high-end RD prospect for Klingberg, there’s not a scenario that would benefit Dallas enough to move him.
ItWasIn, Goofie et Francez a aimé ceci.
12 juill. 2020 à 10 h 55
#10
Cody
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 436
Mentions "j'aime": 126
Quoting: TheMooterus
THANK YOU! Everyone is making trades involving Klingberg without taking a look at how s***ty the remaining core of RD is for Dallas.

If Dallas trades a top-4 defenseman, it almost HAS to be Lindell. Unless someone is willing to give up a top-4 RD or high-end RD prospect for Klingberg, there’s not a scenario that would benefit Dallas enough to move him.


The only way I do a Klingberg trade is if they can bring in a legit RHD which seems unlikely
TheMooterus a aimé ceci.
12 juill. 2020 à 10 h 57
#11
Cody
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 436
Mentions "j'aime": 126
Why is Dallas giving up the 1st? They’re moving the best player in this deal. A deal like this shouldn’t have any cap moves either. A deal with Dallas should be Boeser + for Klingberg. A legit number 1 dman only making 4.25 Million. Canucks actually save money and get the better player with both having 2 years left. Vancouver needs to add
12 juill. 2020 à 10 h 59
#12
Cody
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 436
Mentions "j'aime": 126
Quoting: csick
I kind of like this for both teams . Only issue is Klingberg’s term


Boeser and Klingberg have the same term if that’s what you’re referring to
12 juill. 2020 à 11 h 37
#13
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,654
Mentions "j'aime": 23,800
Quoting: Francez
Boeser and Klingberg have the same term if that’s what you’re referring to


Except Klingberg is a UFA after his deal ends and Boeser is an RFa
Francez a aimé ceci.
12 juill. 2020 à 11 h 44
#14
Cody
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 436
Mentions "j'aime": 126
Quoting: csick
Except Klingberg is a UFA after his deal ends and Boeser is an RFa


That’s what I assumed. Klingberg will probably go for 8.5-9 million while Boeser goes for 7-8 which I can get your point
csick a aimé ceci.
12 juill. 2020 à 12 h 38
#15
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,654
Mentions "j'aime": 23,800
Quoting: Francez
That’s what I assumed. Klingberg will probably go for 8.5-9 million while Boeser goes for 7-8 which I can get your point


Yeah if Klingberg was signed for 4 years at least, this would be amazing for the Canucks. They’d have Hughes controlling offence on the 1st pair and Klingberg on the 2nd
Francez a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage