SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hypothetical Anaheim 1

Créé par: Moldy_Bread
Équipe: 2020-21 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 11 juill. 2020
Publié: 11 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
12 000 000 $
45 000 000 $
2700 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
68 000 000 $
22 500 000 $
21 700 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Athanasiou, Andreas5 000 000 $
Choix de 1e ronde en 2021
Choix de 3e ronde en 2021
Transactions
1.
ANA
OTT
  1. Kesler, Ryan
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
2.
ANA
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (STL)
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (STL)
3.
4.
ANA
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (VGK)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (VGK)
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (VGK)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de STL
Logo de VGK
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de VGK
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de VGK
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de STL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $71 207 166 $0 $850 000 $10 292 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 150 000 $2 150 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 juill. 2020 à 17 h 23
#1
Hockey 1st Sens 2nd
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 3,562
Mentions "j'aime": 1,592
That would certainly be VERY nice of Ottawa to do that for you, but I doubt they accept.
leafs101 a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2020 à 17 h 25
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,202
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Why? You're first round pick is gonna be top 5 and you'll get San Jose Shark-ed. Plus Getzlaf is a far better option at center than Athanasiou, go sign someone just as good for as much or less money in UFA
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2020 à 17 h 25
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 160
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Quoting: TCMonkey
That would certainly be VERY nice of Ottawa to do that for you, but I doubt they accept.


I chose Ottawa because they already have three LTIR contracts in Gaborik, MacArthur, and Callahan. It could be any team willing to take on Kesler's contract
11 juill. 2020 à 17 h 28
#4
Meme Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,080
Mentions "j'aime": 229
Oilers say no way. They aren't going to lose cap space for a deal unless its for something that will actually improve the team. They most likely move out benning this off season given that theyd want to sign bear long term like they did with klefbom. Then move chiasson for a pick to relieve space until the dead space becomes open and russel's contract expires after next season. also AA is an RFA so at that price EDM get a 1st and 3rd rnd pick
11 juill. 2020 à 17 h 39
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
why trade Guddy and silf for a cap dump, two nothings, and a guy who will likely never play hockey again... and AA is one of the worst players in the league. I wouldn't pay a 7th for him at 700k much less a first for him at 5 mil...
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2020 à 17 h 44
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
why would the blues ever do that?
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2020 à 18 h 3
#7
Hockey 1st Sens 2nd
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 3,562
Mentions "j'aime": 1,592
Quoting: HockeyPlusCommunism
I chose Ottawa because they already have three LTIR contracts in Gaborik, MacArthur, and Callahan. It could be any team willing to take on Kesler's contract


Ottawa wouldn't even trade Guénette for a 5th round pick. He's developing quite nicely and, according to Dobber, could be a very serviceable 3rd pairing or possibly even second pairing guy. So the idea of giving him up WHILE taking on $7M in cap for 2 full seasons is just a bad deal.
11 juill. 2020 à 18 h 18
#8
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 28,924
Mentions "j'aime": 11,217
Hypothetical? I think you meant hydroponic.
11 juill. 2020 à 20 h 22
#9
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,056
Mentions "j'aime": 24,974
All four of those trades make absolutely no sense whatsoever for Anaheim. And the AA offer sheet is an even worse idea. Neither Athanasiou nor Kassian is as good as Silfverberg, and exchanging Gudbranson for Forbert is insane, so the net result is awful.
Shylo_Moxii a aimé ceci.
12 juill. 2020 à 2 h 25
#10
Kafle
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,467
Mentions "j'aime": 483
I know silfverberg is a better player than kassian but taking on the pylon is way too much
13 juill. 2020 à 10 h 8
#11
dp6154
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 213
Mentions "j'aime": 46
If Pietrangelo signs for 8M AAV he's a Blue, hell the Blues probably keep him for 9M, it's likely that he want near 10 that he walks, that's what you're looking at

Also in what universe do the cap tight, let Backes walk when he is captain, Blues want David Backes back, especially paying picks to pay 6M a year for him. They wouldn't even want to take picks for him right now because they are not rebuilding with cap room, they especial wouldn't give picks for the Ducks to cap dump.

Like put those 2 thoughts together, you are an elite team, defending cup champs and currently sitting at the top of your conference heading into the playoffs, you could pay your current captain who is a top 5 player at his position, captained you to the first cup in your history exactly what you offered him in November or you could let him walk and spend 3/4 of that much, which you still have to clear cap space for, & trade away two draft picks when you are thin on picks to bring back your previous captain who is a washed up badly overpriced 4th liner when you already have a former 1st lier who is paid too much to be a good defensive 4th line who is already better at playing and costs 250k a year less already on the roster(Steen)

In what universe is that anything but an old video game "allow forced trades" move?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage