SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flames

Créé par: Boomer125
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 10 juill. 2020
Publié: 11 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
77 000 000 $
44 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
78 750 000 $
12 750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
ANA
  1. Lucic, Milan
  2. Mangiapane, Andrew [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
4.
CGY
  1. Labanc, Kevin [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (WSH)
SJS
  1. Kylington, Oliver [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de SJS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de WSH
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $72 376 666 $0 $882 500 $9 123 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
8 750 000 $8 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 juill. 2020 à 12 h 55
#1
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,207
Mentions "j'aime": 9,017
Backlund NTC so thats not good, but id do it depending on what Reinhart is looking for in a contract. LW is not a position of need
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2020 à 12 h 55
#2
H
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 295
Mentions "j'aime": 34
I’ve never seen a worse kap trade in my life like what the **** is that
11 juill. 2020 à 12 h 55
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Sharks reject. We dont need Kylington at all
JumboJoe a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2020 à 12 h 57
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,057
Mentions "j'aime": 587
I don't know where this should make sense for the Leafs. Both Kerfoot and Kapanen are better than both Calgary player. And the difference is not a 3rd round pick
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2020 à 12 h 57
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,124
Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
Quoting: papishark
Sharks reject. We dont need Kylington at all


Sharks need everything - you can pretend they don't all you want but they need everything
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2020 à 12 h 58
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,124
Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
Quoting: Hunter69z
I’ve never seen a worse kap trade in my life like what the **** is that


There should be more headed to TO
11 juill. 2020 à 12 h 59
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,124
Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
Quoting: Gordon_Bombay
I don't know where this should make sense for the Leafs. Both Kerfoot and Kapanen are better than both Calgary player. And the difference is not a 3rd round pick


It frees up a small amount of cap space , gives the Leafs a right shot C for 3 C, I do agree there should be more headed to TO
11 juill. 2020 à 13 h 2
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 1,414
Mentions "j'aime": 389
Interesting Ducks trade
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2020 à 13 h 2
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 979
Mentions "j'aime": 228
Quoting: Boomer125
Sharks need everything - you can pretend they don't all you want but they need everything


So why would we trade Labanc? Kylington is not where it starts
papishark et FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2020 à 13 h 4
#10
Go Sharks Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 1,583
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: Boomer125
Sharks need everything - you can pretend they don't all you want but they need everything


we don't need a LD. We have Vlasic, Ferraro, and Simek. Middleton is a solid 7th defenseman and in the future we have Kniazev. Would it hurt to get more defenseman? No probably not, but we need forwards way more so we aren't trading forwards for defenseman unless it's a steal.
Rob32sjsharks , papishark, FunMustBeAlways and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2020 à 13 h 10
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 2,711
Mentions "j'aime": 1,053
Quoting: Shibbal18
Backlund NTC so thats not good, but id do it depending on what Reinhart is looking for in a contract. LW is not a position of need


Sabres should make this deal if Backlund agrees to waive. Perfect 2C bridge that can slide into 3C role in 1-2 years. Can play Gaudreau on offwing RW 2nd line similar to Kane in Chicago very similar game they play.
Leaves us lots of cap space plus all of our picks/prospects to acquire RW to play with Jack.
Shibbal18 et Elevatorboy a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2020 à 13 h 14
#12
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,207
Mentions "j'aime": 9,017
Quoting: dzmets
Sabres should make this deal if Backlund agrees to waive. Perfect 2C bridge that can slide into 3C role in 1-2 years. Can play Gaudreau on offwing RW 2nd line similar to Kane in Chicago very similar game they play.
Leaves us lots of cap space plus all of our picks/prospects to acquire RW to play with Jack.


May as well take Holtz then at 8. Throw Skinner on the RW temporarily
11 juill. 2020 à 13 h 19
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 4,032
Mentions "j'aime": 1,923
sabres take this.
11 juill. 2020 à 13 h 20
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,192
Mentions "j'aime": 4,657
Quoting: Boomer125
Sharks need everything - you can pretend they don't all you want but they need everything


Sharks have 2 solid young LD and Vlassic who we are stuck with for 5 more years at least, on top of that we have 3-4 kids in the minors who look to be NHL caliber LHD men so no we actually don’t need him
On top of that the weakest spot on both the sharks roster and in the minors is RW and RH shot, so why would we trade from
Our biggest weakness for a player that fits in one of our deepest positions?

Sharks say no not because of the value or the talent but because of position need.
papishark a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2020 à 13 h 26
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,192
Mentions "j'aime": 4,657
Quoting: JumboJoe
we don't need a LD. We have Vlasic, Ferraro, and Simek. Middleton is a solid 7th defenseman and in the future we have Kniazev. Would it hurt to get more defenseman? No probably not, but we need forwards way more so we aren't trading forwards for defenseman unless it's a steal.


Your also forgetting Carrrik, pasichynuk, Knyzhov! These three plus kniavev all grade out -around 4-7 NHL caliber with some potential in Pasichynuk and kniavev to be top 2 pairing defenders.
11 juill. 2020 à 13 h 35
#16
Go Sharks Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 1,583
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Your also forgetting Carrrik, pasichynuk, Knyzhov! These three plus kniavev all grade out -around 4-7 NHL caliber with some potential in Pasichynuk and kniavev to be top 2 pairing defenders.


true, but in the future I see something like

Ferraro-Karlsson
Kniazev-Merkley
Simek-Roy

Don't really see where the others slot in
11 juill. 2020 à 13 h 47
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,192
Mentions "j'aime": 4,657
Quoting: JumboJoe
true, but in the future I see something like

Ferraro-Karlsson
Kniazev-Merkley
Simek-Roy

Don't really see where the others slot in


Trade bait and injury fill ins camp breakouts pushing others down you should have 5 players for 3 positions if you want true depth
11 juill. 2020 à 13 h 48
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,192
Mentions "j'aime": 4,657
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Trade bait and injury fill ins camp breakouts pushing others down you should have 5 players for 3 positions if you want true depth


I’d love another offensive D and dump EKG 65
11 juill. 2020 à 14 h 24
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,216
Mentions "j'aime": 2,867
Unless Kylington is worth a 32-36OA 2nd rounder, San Jose walks away pretty quick
11 juill. 2020 à 14 h 29
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,288
Mentions "j'aime": 19,538
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Unless Kylington is worth a 32-36OA 2nd rounder, San Jose walks away pretty quick


Kylington is an NHL caliber defense that can play #4. So about what you want from a 2nd rounder
11 juill. 2020 à 14 h 34
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 2,711
Mentions "j'aime": 1,053
Quoting: Shibbal18
May as well take Holtz then at 8. Throw Skinner on the RW temporarily


Unless they can get Hoffman or Toffoli on reasonable UFA deals or if they can acquire Rackell, Silfverberg, Boeser, etc
11 juill. 2020 à 14 h 37
#22
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,207
Mentions "j'aime": 9,017
Quoting: dzmets
Unless they can get Hoffman or Toffoli on reasonable UFA deals or if they can acquire Rackell, Silfverberg, Boeser, etc


I wouldnt spend money on a UFA. I doubt Vancouver moves Boeser, sounds like an Eichel rumor. Rackell or Silfverberg should be realistically attainable imo despite what anaheim fans believe
11 juill. 2020 à 14 h 42
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 2,711
Mentions "j'aime": 1,053
Quoting: Shibbal18
I wouldnt spend money on a UFA. I doubt Vancouver moves Boeser, sounds like an Eichel rumor. Rackell or Silfverberg should be realistically attainable imo despite what anaheim fans believe


If and it's a big if they can get Toffoli on 3 x 5 or Hoffman on 2 x 6 I would do that. I realize this is very optimistic and unlikely and if it takes more than this then I agree we should not commit to more term or AAV, but if some of the better RW ufas want to take short term lower AAV deals in Hope's of hitting it big in a few years when their might be a cap increase I don't mind trying to push forward this team a little faster.
11 juill. 2020 à 14 h 44
#24
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,207
Mentions "j'aime": 9,017
Quoting: dzmets
If and it's a big if they can get Toffoli on 3 x 5 or Hoffman on 2 x 6 I would do that. I realize this is very optimistic and unlikely and if it takes more than this then I agree we should not commit to more term or AAV, but if some of the better RW ufas want to take short term lower AAV deals in Hope's of hitting it big in a few years when their might be a cap increase I don't mind trying to push forward this team a little faster.


This off season i wouldnt expect any decent UFAs to consider Buffalo.
11 juill. 2020 à 14 h 46
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 2,711
Mentions "j'aime": 1,053
Quoting: Shibbal18
This off season i wouldnt expect any decent UFAs to consider Buffalo.


Probably not but I don't think anyone can predict what this offseason will bring. It will likely be filled with alot of one offs and perhaps some non typical UFA deals and destinations.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage