SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ideal Boeser Targets

Créé par: Canucks33
Équipe: 2019-20 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 10 juill. 2020
Publié: 10 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I should start by saying I don't think there's anything of substance behind the rumour.

Obviously the Canucks would be looking for a young defenseman, preferably right-handed. Ideally a trade would be as close to a 1-for-1 deal as possible. Some of these targets are more realistic than others.

I think the best ones are Pulock/Dobson or Pesce. The Islanders could use a young winger and have an excess of right-handed defensemen. Moving Pulock would save them a little bit of cap space which they need, while moving Dobson would keep the current team intact. Both would be ideal partners for Hughes, which is the role that we would be trying to find. Pulock in particular would give us a modern day Keith - Seabrook pairing. Pesce would fill a similar role, but I'm not sure if Carolina would be as ready to make a move like this.
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
11999 999 999 $30 627 500 $0 $1 570 000 $969 372 499 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Islanders de New York
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 025 000 $4 025 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
714 166 $714 166 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 4
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 juill. 2020 à 22 h 6
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
byram. hahaha keep dreaming

Boeser is good, hes not great, hes not elite, he was the 3rd best forward on his line and has serious injury history.
Lets tone down the expectations here
10 juill. 2020 à 22 h 8
#2
retired
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 8,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
islanders cant afford the cap. if carolina wanted to trade pesce for a winger i think they would have swapped for nylander by now.
10 juill. 2020 à 22 h 9
#3
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,539
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
I think you’d be looking more at an Essa Lindell type than any of the guys listed
10 juill. 2020 à 22 h 11
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,641
Mentions "j'aime": 14,426
Oh honey....
10 juill. 2020 à 22 h 12
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: coga16
byram. hahaha keep dreaming

Boeser is good, hes not great, hes not elite, he was the 3rd best forward on his line and has serious injury history.
Lets tone down the expectations here


Doesn't really drive play much at all either. But a very good shot. He's like a poor man's Debrincat.
10 juill. 2020 à 22 h 13
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Sagecoll
Doesn't really drive play much at all either. But a very good shot. He's like a poor man's Debrincat.


hes a guy who can play with elite players, there is value in that but hes going to be a complimentary piece on a very good team who is ready for a cup run.
I haven't did the comps myself but I am curious at how this years seasons of Boeser and Burakovsky stack up

charting hockey had a really good twitter thread about boeser
UpsideDownQue a aimé ceci.
10 juill. 2020 à 22 h 19
#7
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Lundkvist?
10 juill. 2020 à 22 h 20
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: coga16
hes a guy who can play with elite players, there is value in that but hes going to be a complimentary piece on a very good team who is ready for a cup run.
I haven't did the comps myself but I am curious at how this years seasons of Boeser and Burakovsky stack up

charting hockey had a really good twitter thread about boeser


Depends how you look at it. expected goal models don't love Boeser because he derives a lot of his value from his shooting talent. So if you're looking at xWAR. Burakovsky is better significantly. But Boeser takes the edge in terms of WAR by a healthy margin. You're paying for Boeser's shot, like Laine,
10 juill. 2020 à 22 h 28
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,851
Mentions "j'aime": 6,441
Lmoa get Werenski out of there. The only way you’re getting him is for Horvat. We need a 2nd line center.... not more wings.
Viqsi a aimé ceci.
10 juill. 2020 à 22 h 32
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
McAvoy a for sure no, and Carlo is most likely off limits as well. They’re cost controlled and they don’t really have strong depth on the right side after those guys. I really like Boeser as a player and I think he would be an awesome fit, just can’t see it coming at the cost of either of the two players above
10 juill. 2020 à 22 h 40
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,074
Mentions "j'aime": 862
Detroit offers Svech, Cholowski, 2nd EDM, 2nd WSH

Or we can entertain Eriksson as part of the deal
10 juill. 2020 à 22 h 50
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Sagecoll
Depends how you look at it. expected goal models don't love Boeser because he derives a lot of his value from his shooting talent. So if you're looking at xWAR. Burakovsky is better significantly. But Boeser takes the edge in terms of WAR by a healthy margin. You're paying for Boeser's shot, like Laine,


Shot is elite no denying that but curious of overall impacts, reality you want to plug him into either top 6 lines, youre not
Building a line around him,

Just was curious how they stack up against one another bc Boeser would be filling that same role as bura.

In this trade scenario he’s a nice to have but in no way avs need to spend any significant asset to get Boeser. Avs set a comfortable price (means no byram or Newhook) canucks don’t like it then good luck finding a team that will
10 juill. 2020 à 23 h 16
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,499
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Boeser would be great for Boston at 2RW....but Carlo and McAvoy are non-starters. Not sure there is something that wields unless it's a LHD or LW
10 juill. 2020 à 23 h 26
#14
Cold spaghetti
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 4,917
Mentions "j'aime": 2,134
Pulock, Mcavoy, Seider, and Byram, maybe even Boqvist are all off limits, even for a player as good as Boeser. I think the most fair deal would be to try and work out a deal for Pesce considering the depth they have on the backend, even then I am not sure they do it.
10 juill. 2020 à 23 h 47
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Quoting: coga16
hes a guy who can play with elite players, there is value in that but hes going to be a complimentary piece on a very good team who is ready for a cup run.
I haven't did the comps myself but I am curious at how this years seasons of Boeser and Burakovsky stack up

charting hockey had a really good twitter thread about boeser


Boeser is very overrated. I compared him and Burakovsky a bit in a post on this AGM: https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/340722?post_id=1545706

Long story short: very similar production overall, Burakovsky had an inflated S% and better production per 60, Boeser gets a **** ton of PP time though. imo if they both had the exact same usage I would bet that Burakovsky would outproduce Boeser
11 juill. 2020 à 8 h 53
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
laugh laugh The only player on that list that Brock Boeser might return is Filip Hronek, And that's only if we draft Jamie Drysdale. Boeser isn't returning 99.9% of those players.
Viqsi a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage