SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Stanley Cup

Créé par: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Équipe: 2020-21 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 9 juill. 2020
Publié: 9 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Colorado pay a very hefty price to get Huberdeau but they keep their top prospect and become heavy cup favorites for the next 3 years.

In 3 years they will have many contracts expiring and they can pick who they want to keep on their team as their core.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
45 000 000 $
33 500 000 $
33 000 000 $
32 750 000 $
33 500 000 $
1800 000 $
Transactions
FLA
  1. Burakovsky, André
  2. Newhook, Alex
  3. Zadorov, Nikita
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (COL)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (COL)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (COL)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de FLA
Logo de COL
2021
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2022
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $76 968 095 $0 $5 425 000 $4 531 905 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 571 429 $5 571 429 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 5
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
800 000 $800 000 $
C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 450 000 $3 450 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 juill. 2020 à 16 h 20
#1
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,580
Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
That's too much for Huberdeau. Newhook is arguably our best prospect as well, no thanks.
DirtyDangle a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2020 à 16 h 22
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Zadorov is the LAST kind of player the sharks need.
9 juill. 2020 à 16 h 23
#3
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,131
Mentions "j'aime": 20,442
Huge overpayment
9 juill. 2020 à 16 h 37
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: Richard88
That's too much for Huberdeau. Newhook is arguably our best prospect as well, no thanks.


Byram is your best prospect by a mile. If you put him in instead you can probably cut the cost further.

Quoting: papishark
Zadorov is the LAST kind of player the sharks need.


Lol you don't like making trades, do you?
9 juill. 2020 à 16 h 38
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: SevenLeg
Huge overpayment


Changed it. Not sure if Florida takes this though.

Switched a 1st for Zadorov and a 2nd.
9 juill. 2020 à 16 h 42
#6
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,580
Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Byram is your best prospect by a mile. If you put him in instead you can probably cut the cost further.



Lol you don't like making trades, do you?


I said that Newhook is ARGUABLY our best prospect, not that he definitely is. For what it's worth Wheeler in an article in The Athletic yesterday ranked Newhook 4th and Byram 5th as the best drafted prospects. He's not the first pundit I've seen put Newhook ahead of Byram. Either way I am not keen to trade them.
9 juill. 2020 à 16 h 46
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: Richard88
I said that Newhook is ARGUABLY our best prospect, not that he definitely is. For what it's worth Wheeler in an article in The Athletic yesterday ranked Newhook 4th and Byram 5th as the best drafted prospects. He's not the first pundit I've seen put Newhook ahead of Byram. Either way I am not keen to trade them.


Who do you think their best prospect is. I think this is a very fair deal. Colorado becomes strong cup favorites for the next 3 years and doesn't take on any bad contracts.

Newhook won't be won't be ready for a couple years. Colorado has to take advantage of McKinnon's cheap contract.
9 juill. 2020 à 16 h 52
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,525
Mentions "j'aime": 3,373
I'm a big fan of Huberdeau, and his contract is amazing, but the proposal is too rich for my liking. I wouldn't include Burakovsky, as that's robbing the right side to boost the left. The idea should be to get someone to play LW on that second line with Naz and Burky.

I'd personally also rather put Byram in the package, take out Newhook and Burakovsky, and modify from there. Not sure there is a solution that works, but that's my opinion.
9 juill. 2020 à 16 h 55
#9
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,580
Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Who do you think their best prospect is. I think this is a very fair deal. Colorado becomes strong cup favorites for the next 3 years and doesn't take on any bad contracts.

Newhook won't be won't be ready for a couple years. Colorado has to take advantage of McKinnon's cheap contract.


I think Byram is our best prospect, but Newhook is a close 2nd.

Burakovsky just had a season pacing 64 points without PP1 time. Huberdeau is a 90 point forward, but the upgrade from Burakovsky to Huberdeau isn't worth one of our top 2 prospects AND a flurry of 1sts.
9 juill. 2020 à 16 h 55
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: SuckMyAvs
I'm a big fan of Huberdeau, and his contract is amazing, but the proposal is too rich for my liking. I wouldn't include Burakovsky, as that's robbing the right side to boost the left. The idea should be to get someone to play LW on that second line with Naz and Burky.

I'd personally also rather put Byram in the package, take out Newhook and Burakovsky, and modify from there. Not sure there is a solution that works, but that's my opinion.


What about Newhook + Byram + Nichushkin + a 1st?

Quoting: Richard88
I think Byram is our best prospect, but Newhook is a close 2nd.

Burakovsky just had a season pacing 64 points without PP1 time. Huberdeau is a 90 point forward, but the upgrade from Burakovsky to Huberdeau isn't worth one of our top 2 prospects AND a flurry of 1sts.


Huberdeau is better than Rantanen. These talents don't come cheap.

An overpay is probably what it takes to get him.
9 juill. 2020 à 16 h 59
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 951
Mentions "j'aime": 817
If I were you, I would go after Barkov, not Huberdeau. Move Jost to wing and let the domination of MacKinnon, Barkov, and Kadri start. That's a truly formidable center combination.
Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2020 à 17 h 4
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,525
Mentions "j'aime": 3,373
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
What about Newhook + Byram + Nichushkin + a 1st?


It's a tough sell for a guy that thinks Taylor hall will be in Burgundy next season and both Newhook and Byram will still be in the pipe, lol. In all honesty though, I think including two of the top prospects in hockey is a little much. I can see the logic, but I wouldn't do it. I can part with Byram because the team already has Makar, but I think Newhook is a guy they should keep.

I would make a proposal, but I haven't been able to come up with one that both sides will do. I see your logic, but I just wouldn't part with both of those guys.
9 juill. 2020 à 18 h 21
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,586
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
What about Newhook + Byram + Nichushkin + a 1st?



Huberdeau is better than Rantanen. These talents don't come cheap.

An overpay is probably what it takes to get him.


F-ing a joke on no planet are the Avs giving up not just their 2 best prospects but 2 of the best prospects in the league along with another 1st rd pick and Nichushkin. One of the most ridiculous proposals I have seen here.

As far as Huberdeau being better than Rantanen how do you figure? Rantanen scores at a higher rate, has a higher cF, higher point share and has a better exGF differential.

And on top of all of that why wouldn’t the Avs use some cap space sign a 50-60 pt winger keep all of their assets and be even better longer. The Avs are in a position where they have to literally do nothing except sign their own free agents, what in the world would possess them to OVERPAY, on a winger nonetheless.
9 juill. 2020 à 18 h 33
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: Xqb15
F-ing a joke on no planet are the Avs giving up not just their 2 best prospects but 2 of the best prospects in the league along with another 1st rd pick and Nichushkin. One of the most ridiculous proposals I have seen here.

As far as Huberdeau being better than Rantanen how do you figure? Rantanen scores at a higher rate, has a higher cF, higher point share and has a better exGF differential.

And on top of all of that why wouldn’t the Avs use some cap space sign a 50-60 pt winger keep all of their assets and be even better longer. The Avs are in a position where they have to literally do nothing except sign their own free agents, what in the world would possess them to OVERPAY, on a winger nonetheless.


Don't know where you're getting your facts from.

Huberdeau is a 90 point player and Rantanen is an 80 point player.

Rantanen plays with MacKinnon so of course he has a higher exGF differential.

Huberdeau is much better than Rantanen. He's an S tier winger. Rantanen is A tier.
9 juill. 2020 à 18 h 53
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,586
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Don't know where you're getting your facts from.

Huberdeau is a 90 point player and Rantanen is an 80 point player.

Rantanen plays with MacKinnon so of course he has a higher exGF differential.

Huberdeau is much better than Rantanen. He's an S tier winger. Rantanen is A tier.

Where am I getting my facts any nhl.com, hockey-reference.com. Huberdeau has a as in singular 90 pt season not another 80 plus pt season 0.82 ppg.

Rantanen multiple 80 pt seasons 0.89 ppg. So take your bs and sell it elsewhere.

Instead of doubling down on a bad argument “Huberdeau is an S tier” go deeper and look at how Rantanen drives plays and even produces at a pt per game level in the playoffs (18 games so it isn’t some 4 game one off) but Huberdeau is so S tier he has managed to get his team to the playoffs what once where he produced at a stupendous rate of 0.5 ppg for 6 games.

But you be you.
9 juill. 2020 à 19 h 37
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: Xqb15
Where am I getting my facts any nhl.com, hockey-reference.com. Huberdeau has a as in singular 90 pt season not another 80 plus pt season 0.82 ppg.

Rantanen multiple 80 pt seasons 0.89 ppg. So take your bs and sell it elsewhere.

Instead of doubling down on a bad argument “Huberdeau is an S tier” go deeper and look at how Rantanen drives plays and even produces at a pt per game level in the playoffs (18 games so it isn’t some 4 game one off) but Huberdeau is so S tier he has managed to get his team to the playoffs what once where he produced at a stupendous rate of 0.5 ppg for 6 games.

But you be you.


Who had more points this season and last season?... I'm waiting...

You're so biased lol... I'm not a Panthers fan...

MacKinnon is much better than Barkov. Rantanen's stats are boosted and he still has lower production. I don't know why you're arguing this one.
9 juill. 2020 à 19 h 48
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,586
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Who had more points this season and last season?... I'm waiting...

You're so biased lol... I'm not a Panthers fan...

MacKinnon is much better than Barkov. Rantanen's stats are boosted and he still has lower production. I don't know why you're arguing this one.


His production is lower? I literally gave you their career ppg which Rantanen produces at a higher rate. Of course Huberdeau has more pts this year Rantanen missed 20+ games with an injury. Yeah I’m biased for the Avs but that doesn’t change the fact Rantanen is a play driving winger, who has produced in the clutch when it mattered most. But yeah you go with the whole it’s MacKinnon, because with that argument Huberdeau is better than Marner, better than Draisitl, better than just about any winger not named Panarin or Kane. I’m unbiased enough to acknowledge Huberdeau is a very good player, but I’m not going to take some nonsense about Huberdeau being better than Rantanen based off one 90 pt season, or ignoring playoff production or glossing over Rantanen has produced at higher ppg or he has better shot share numbers for his career from a dude who thinks Byram, Newhook a 1st and Nichushkin is worth Huberdeau.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage