SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Schmeichel

Créé par: JumboFett
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 8 juill. 2020
Publié: 8 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1850 000 $
23 500 000 $
23 000 000 $
2900 000 $
33 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Cogliano, Andrew
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (DAL)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (DAL)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
2.
BUF
  1. Dahlén, Jonathan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Labanc, Kevin [Droits de RFA]
  3. Simek, Radim
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (TBL)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (DAL)
  6. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (ARI)
4.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (COL)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de ARI
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de DAL
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de DAL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $76 864 166 $0 $755 000 $4 635 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 juill. 2020 à 20 h 57
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,292
Mentions "j'aime": 2,340
Not enough quality, Plus Eichel isn’t getting traded.
MJCrv a aimé ceci.
8 juill. 2020 à 20 h 59
#2
Pocket Aces
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 318
STOP SENDING BURNS TO DALLAS FOR THE LOVE OF GOD
TheMooterus a aimé ceci.
8 juill. 2020 à 21 h 1
#3
Pocket Aces
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 318
burns is a cap dump now he should not receive a 1st round pick hes old as f**k with a terrible contract and he doesnt know how to defense the only place i can see him going is to seattle along with a nice juicy prospect or pick
8 juill. 2020 à 21 h 22
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 591
Mentions "j'aime": 208
Schmell no.
zyyyp, MisstheWhalers et MJCrv a aimé ceci.
8 juill. 2020 à 21 h 44
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: Amplifys
burns is a cap dump now he should not receive a 1st round pick hes old as f**k with a terrible contract and he doesnt know how to defense the only place i can see him going is to seattle along with a nice juicy prospect or pick


He’s stil a top 5 offensive defenseman and Norris trophy
Candidate he isn’t going anywhere
8 juill. 2020 à 22 h 9
#6
True Reverse Retro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 4,616
Mentions "j'aime": 3,032
Quoting: Amplifys
STOP SENDING BURNS TO DALLAS FOR THE LOVE OF GOD


I’m quoting this, because liking the comment once simply wasn’t enough...
8 juill. 2020 à 22 h 41
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 4,032
Mentions "j'aime": 1,923
Wow a pile of crap for eichel, how could we pass on that.
8 juill. 2020 à 22 h 47
#8
Pocket Aces
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 318
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
He’s stil a top 5 offensive defenseman and Norris trophy
Candidate he isn’t going anywhere


thats what u say u are spending 26.5m on THREE defensemen the contracts ur gm has handed out with these older players are just horrible u dont need both EK65 and Burns and if one leaves its burns but truly his contract will NOT be easy to move hes already 35
8 juill. 2020 à 22 h 48
#9
Pocket Aces
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 318
Quoting: TheMooterus
I’m quoting this, because liking the comment once simply wasn’t enough...


its like people dont realize the guy is a blackhole on defense hes 35 and his contract goes til hes 41 like no thanks id rather sign barrie for cheaper and hes much much younger on top of being a great friend of Jamie
TheMooterus a aimé ceci.
8 juill. 2020 à 22 h 55
#10
True Reverse Retro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 4,616
Mentions "j'aime": 3,032
Quoting: Amplifys
its like people dont realize the guy is a blackhole on defense hes 35 and his contract goes til hes 41 like no thanks id rather sign barrie for cheaper and hes much much younger on top of being a great friend of Jamie


My big concern with Barrie & Piterangelo is the money they’re going to want. With a (likely) flat cap for the next 2 years, and the small increases after that, Dallas has to watch their money.

Between Gurianov, Hintz, Heiskanen, and Klingberg Dallas has some significant players that will be due for significant raises. If Barrie is willing to take a small pay cut due to Texas’ tax situation & his relationship with Benn I’m all for it. If not, I’d seriously consider going after Shattenkirk to play that 2RD role behind Klingberg.
8 juill. 2020 à 23 h 1
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: Amplifys
thats what u say u are spending 26.5m on THREE defensemen the contracts ur gm has handed out with these older players are just horrible u dont need both EK65 and Burns and if one leaves its burns but truly his contract will NOT be easy to move hes already 35


Quoting: Amplifys
its like people dont realize the guy is a blackhole on defense hes 35 and his contract goes til hes 41 like no thanks id rather sign barrie for cheaper and hes much much younger on top of being a great friend of Jamie


Contract Goes till he’s 39 not 41
He’s not that horible on D but he’s not good
He needs a strong D oriented partner to offset his weakness and the sharks have that with Simek now
And let’s remember Rob Blake, Ray Borque, al MacInnis all played well and all star level into their 40’s! and burns is a similar style player with no major injuries or health concerns.
I have no issue with his contract

EKG65 the heartless wonder and MEV those are dumpster fire contracts killing our ability to succeed
8 juill. 2020 à 23 h 13
#12
Pocket Aces
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 318
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Contract Goes till he’s 39 not 41
He’s not that horible on D but he’s not good
He needs a strong D oriented partner to offset his weakness and the sharks have that with Simek now
And let’s remember Rob Blake, Ray Borque, al MacInnis all played well and all star level into their 40’s! and burns is a similar style player with no major injuries or health concerns.
I have no issue with his contract

EKG65 the heartless wonder and MEV those are dumpster fire contracts killing our ability to succeed


its until hes 40 the dallas stars do not need to add 8m to their cap hit for him when they already have offensive minded defensemen hes not needed in dallas people need to stop sending him to dallas i 100% firmly believe hes going to seattle
8 juill. 2020 à 23 h 15
#13
Pocket Aces
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 318
Quoting: TheMooterus
My big concern with Barrie & Piterangelo is the money they’re going to want. With a (likely) flat cap for the next 2 years, and the small increases after that, Dallas has to watch their money.

Between Gurianov, Hintz, Heiskanen, and Klingberg Dallas has some significant players that will be due for significant raises. If Barrie is willing to take a small pay cut due to Texas’ tax situation & his relationship with Benn I’m all for it. If not, I’d seriously consider going after Shattenkirk to play that 2RD role behind Klingberg.


ya i totally agree im just saying id rather sign a guy like barrie or shattenkirk who have defensive liabilities arent 35 already and for cheaper and i totally think barrie would sign a cheaper deal to go to dallas that would be a very very nice top 4 would rather not give up assets for burns for christ sake not worth it for any team besides seattle in my eyes
TheMooterus a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2020 à 0 h 9
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: Amplifys
its until hes 40 the dallas stars do not need to add 8m to their cap hit for him when they already have offensive minded defensemen hes not needed in dallas people need to stop sending him to dallas i 100% firmly believe hes going to seattle


He’s NOT going anywhere he will retire a shark no reason or want to trade him
I’m desperately hoping Seattle wants or takes EKG65
9 juill. 2020 à 0 h 10
#15
Pocket Aces
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 318
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
He’s NOT going anywhere he will retire a shark no reason or want to trade him
I’m desperately hoping Seattle wants or takes EKG65


lmao i dont think hes retiring a shark sir
9 juill. 2020 à 0 h 11
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: Amplifys
lmao i dont think hes retiring a shark sir


Why not he’s 39 when his contract is up and there is no way sharks GM trades him
9 juill. 2020 à 0 h 15
#17
Pocket Aces
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 318
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Why not he’s 39 when his contract is up and there is no way sharks GM trades him


ok whatever u say!!
9 juill. 2020 à 0 h 18
#18
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Kasper schmeichel, ok, I guess he would be an upgrade over jones
9 juill. 2020 à 4 h 34
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,928
Mentions "j'aime": 2,670
Buffalo decline
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage