SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Gibson for Eichel

Créé par: oneX
Équipe: 2020-21 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 8 juill. 2020
Publié: 8 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Only looking to discuss this trade here.

1 for 1


Would you do it?
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1881 500 000 $68 932 166 $0 $0 $12 567 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 juill. 2020 à 18 h 51
#26
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
For the sake of fun. I travel into the future 2023-2024 to be exact I package Gibby/Dostal a 1st(Top 3 Protected), B prospect from previous drafts and a assortment of picks 2nd-4th with conditions like if Ducks were to get to the SCF or WCF the 2026 2nd becomes a first and so on. Thoughts?
8 juill. 2020 à 18 h 53
#27
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,047
Mentions "j'aime": 3,752
Quoting: Arlotti47
Gibson is the only reason why the Ducks weren’t last. Eichel were the only reason why the Sabres weren’t last. Both teams need those players to stay on their team.


Ducks can easily sign Lehner or Markstrom after the trade and be contenders.

Buffalo could offer sheet Cirelli and get a major piece for Ullmark .


No path is simple, certainly not the path forward
oneX et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
8 juill. 2020 à 18 h 59
#28
Lets Go Blues
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 6,774
Mentions "j'aime": 4,332
The margin between elite goaltending and average goaltending is so much smaller than the margin between an elite center and an average center. To put it another way, Gibson was below average this year and eichel will never be below average for the length of his contract. Sabres should decline. And I think Gibson is the best goalie in the league. Goalie is just such a volatile position.
8 juill. 2020 à 19 h 0
#29
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,100
Mentions "j'aime": 25,016
Quoting: Trickster
Why would Ducks say no?
Even Gibson and Henrique for Eichel, I'd do it eyes closed no problem


What a great idea!!
oneX et Trickster a aimé ceci.
8 juill. 2020 à 19 h 12
#30
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,770
Mentions "j'aime": 2,619
Quoting: A_K
The margin between elite goaltending and average goaltending is so much smaller than the margin between an elite center and an average center. To put it another way, Gibson was below average this year and eichel will never be below average for the length of his contract. Sabres should decline. And I think Gibson is the best goalie in the league. Goalie is just such a volatile position.


I did ask what should be added to the deal, likely from Anaheim. Even adding a roster player and a pick would make sense for the Ducks.

As others pointed out, the team can then go and sign a UFA goalie ( Lehner or Markstrom) and still be competitive and keep the young players they have.
Trickster a aimé ceci.
8 juill. 2020 à 20 h 21
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,586
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
Gibson couldn’t get the Ducks to the playoffs. What’s he going to be in BUF minus Eichel. Easy no for BUF.
8 juill. 2020 à 22 h 36
#32
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,100
Mentions "j'aime": 25,016
Quoting: Xqb15
Gibson couldn’t get the Ducks to the playoffs. What’s he going to be in BUF minus Eichel. Easy no for BUF.


That assumes Buffalo has a choice.
8 juill. 2020 à 23 h 38
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 303
Quoting: hanson493
heres the problem with this deal... gibson who is a stud and could help carry a contender is being swapped to another rebuilding team. It would make more sense to trade gibson to a carolina who needs a goalie. but at the same time. Why would anaheim give a way a 26 year old goalie. its hard to find goalies of his caliber.


You’re asking why Anaheim would trade a 26yo goalie for an elite 23yo franchise center with 6 years remaining on his contract?
8 juill. 2020 à 23 h 42
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 303
Quoting: OldNYIfan
That assumes Buffalo has a choice.

A choice in whether they trade Eichel? A player with 6 years remaining in his contract and who has no power, even if he requested a trade? Which he hasn’t. Buffalo has no obligation to trade him and even if they did choose to, they certainly would have a choice as to where and for what. A goalie? C’mon
8 juill. 2020 à 23 h 42
#35
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 303
Quoting: OldNYIfan
That assumes Buffalo has a choice.

A choice in whether they trade Eichel? A player with 6 years remaining in his contract and who has no power, even if he requested a trade? Which he hasn’t. Buffalo has no obligation to trade him and even if they did choose to, they certainly would have a choice as to where and for what. A goalie? C’mon
9 juill. 2020 à 8 h 46
#36
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,617
Mentions "j'aime": 2,763
Quoting: MJCrv
You’re asking why Anaheim would trade a 26yo goalie for an elite 23yo franchise center with 6 years remaining on his contract?


yes. Goalie is the most important position on the ice and gibson is one of the best in the league. gibsons contract has 7 more years at 6.4m thats INCREDIBLE value for a position that is hard to find. I dont think anaheim trades that for 1 player as good as eichel is.
9 juill. 2020 à 8 h 48
#37
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 303
Quoting: hanson493
yes. Goalie is the most important position on the ice and gibson is one of the best in the league. gibsons contract has 7 more years at 6.4m thats INCREDIBLE value for a position that is hard to find. I dont think anaheim trades that for 1 player as good as eichel is.

Ummmm, no. Elite center is the most important position in hockey and extremely hard to come by. Gibson is replaceable. He’s great, but you’re not getting Eichel for that.
9 juill. 2020 à 8 h 57
#38
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,586
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
Quoting: OldNYIfan
That assumes Buffalo has a choice.


Eichel is under contract for 6 yrs. Unless he wants to play in the KHL BUF doesn’t have to do a thing they don’t want to.
9 juill. 2020 à 9 h 50
#39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,617
Mentions "j'aime": 2,763
Quoting: MJCrv
Ummmm, no. Elite center is the most important position in hockey and extremely hard to come by. Gibson is replaceable. He’s great, but you’re not getting Eichel for that.


first it takes a team to win, second you can win the stanley cup without an elite center. 3rd. almost every team has an elite center so i wouldnt say they are extremely hard to come by. Gibson is not replaceable. theres 90-95% of the league who would kill to have john gibson as their starting goalie for the next 7 years.
9 juill. 2020 à 9 h 54
#40
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 303
Quoting: hanson493
first it takes a team to win, second you can win the stanley cup without an elite center. 3rd. almost every team has an elite center so i wouldnt say they are extremely hard to come by. Gibson is not replaceable. theres 90-95% of the league who would kill to have john gibson as their starting goalie for the next 7 years.


OMG are you out of your mind? Elite centers are almost always acquired through the top picks in the draft. They don’t get traded. Especially in their prime. Also, almost every Stanley cup winning team in recent history has an elite center
9 juill. 2020 à 10 h 11
#41
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,617
Mentions "j'aime": 2,763
Quoting: MJCrv
OMG are you out of your mind? Elite centers are almost always acquired through the top picks in the draft. They don’t get traded. Especially in their prime. Also, almost every Stanley cup winning team in recent history has an elite center


or a stud goalie that got hot through the playoffs... quick, crawford, murray, rask, holtby... cant be anything to do with overall team composition either. has to be solely one elite center. lmao. lets try this a different way. name a team without an elite center. vs name a team without elite goaltending. cuz gibson is elite. one side is going to be alot higher than the other no? hows buffalo doing without a decent goaltender? hows carolina or toronto doing without that elite goaltender. if either team had gibson they would be stanley cup favorites.
9 juill. 2020 à 10 h 13
#42
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 303
Quoting: hanson493
or a stud goalie that got hot through the playoffs... quick, crawford, murray, rask, holtby... cant be anything to do with overall team composition either. has to be solely one elite center. lmao. lets try this a different way. name a team without an elite center. vs name a team without elite goaltending. cuz gibson is elite. one side is going to be alot higher than the other no? hows buffalo doing without a decent goaltender? hows carolina or toronto doing without that elite goaltender. if either team had gibson they would be stanley cup favorites.


How’s Anaheim doing WITH Gibson? And why are you trying to trade him for Eichel if he’s so important. No thanks.
9 juill. 2020 à 10 h 44
#43
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,617
Mentions "j'aime": 2,763
Quoting: MJCrv
How’s Anaheim doing WITH Gibson? And why are you trying to trade him for Eichel if he’s so important. No thanks.


im not trading him for eichel... as stated by my 3 previous comments youve replied on. and again. takes a team. not just 1 or 2 players. you NEED the goalie if you have any shot at winning a cup though.
9 juill. 2020 à 11 h 13
#44
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 303
Quoting: hanson493
im not trading him for eichel... as stated by my 3 previous comments youve replied on. and again. takes a team. not just 1 or 2 players. you NEED the goalie if you have any shot at winning a cup though.


They don’t need Gibson for eichel
9 juill. 2020 à 12 h 45
#45
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,100
Mentions "j'aime": 25,016
Quoting: MJCrv
A choice in whether they trade Eichel? A player with 6 years remaining in his contract and who has no power, even if he requested a trade? Which he hasn’t. Buffalo has no obligation to trade him and even if they did choose to, they certainly would have a choice as to where and for what. A goalie? C’mon


Quoting: Xqb15
Eichel is under contract for 6 yrs. Unless he wants to play in the KHL BUF doesn’t have to do a thing they don’t want to.


I think that you're going to be unpleasantly surprised to learn how the real world works. Unhappy employees tend to be a sufficient irritant that they have to be removed. See Patrick Roy.
9 juill. 2020 à 12 h 57
#46
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 303
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I think that you're going to be unpleasantly surprised to learn how the real world works. Unhappy employees tend to be a sufficient irritant that they have to be removed. See Patrick Roy.

I guess they’ll deal with it if it gets to that point. But. It’s not, so why trade him?
9 juill. 2020 à 13 h 0
#47
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,100
Mentions "j'aime": 25,016
Quoting: MJCrv
I guess they’ll deal with it if it gets to that point. But. It’s not, so why trade him?


Then why all the rumors the past two weeks after Eichel's public statements?

I'm not saying that they haven't been taken out of context or at least blown out of proportion, but there is some definite dis-satisfaction there.
oneX a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2020 à 13 h 14
#48
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 303
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Then why all the rumors the past two weeks after Eichel's public statements?

I'm not saying that they haven't been taken out of context or at least blown out of proportion, but there is some definite dis-satisfaction there.

They’re are no rumors, not in Buffalo anyway. What you’re probably reading are people posting articles so they can get clicks.
9 juill. 2020 à 13 h 32
#49
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,586
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I think that you're going to be unpleasantly surprised to learn how the real world works. Unhappy employees tend to be a sufficient irritant that they have to be removed. See Patrick Roy.


Well seeing as how I’ve managed people for over 20 yrs, I wouldn’t be surprised. However a guy making $10M a yr for 6 yrs decides to be an irritant, what’s he going to do have a tantrum get on social media and say if you don’t trade me I’m going to pout? He literally has ZERO leverage. Are they going to be any worse because he wants to be an irritant how does that suit his needs? Duchene requested a trade and Colorado kept him for 18 months because they didn’t like what the offers were. You don’t think the GM’s and owners of the world took notice of that? BUF literally would be foolish to do anything other than set the price at a kings ransom and not accept a penny less.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage