Why is Buffalo sending a 2nd in that Ristolainen trade, there's no way that should be in there.

Thx a lot

That deal doesnt really make sense for either team imo cant see either team wanting to do that, backes is only owed about 2-2.5 mil if I remember right so moving him doesnt accomplish alot, and he waived for the Ducks to get playing time, which I dont know if he would get that in BUF

Cant see the Ducks wanting to give up a first second and third and Buf shouldnt have to add to Risto to get a good return

Sabres need to add in a Hanifin/Montour swap in my opinion. That is not a 1 for 1 trade.

Why is Buffalo trading McCabe away for nothing, then signing an inferior Merrill for nearly the same cap hit

Need the 3rd back for offer sheet on Cirelli

I like the trade idea with the Ducks. I would be ok without the retention as Backes only has 1 yr remaining

Montour for Hanifin one for one?

Jesus Murphy. That is laughable.

Flames easily say bugger off.

can add something other than a 4th then, or give them tage for the 3rd straight up

I agree I would want a larger return. I don't know that a winger prospect is going to entice them to move an asset as they are overflowing with them

Idk but I wasn't commenting on that trade..Lol.. Merrill would be a good 3rd pair addition for the Sabres though, they really need to trade one their RHD not named Jokiharju and sign a good and affordable 3rd pair LHD, really don't think they should trade McCabe though.