SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sharks Push All Chips In

Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 7 juill. 2020
Publié: 7 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
What do we think?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
23 450 000 $
22 000 000 $
23 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
Transactions
SJS
  1. Georgiev, Alexandar [Droits de RFA]
  2. Strome, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
NYR
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (TBL)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $73 734 999 $0 $665 000 $7 765 001 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 450 000 $3 450 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 juill. 2020 à 23 h 44
#1
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Sharks decline? 2 top 35 picks? Seems like an easy no for them
7 juill. 2020 à 23 h 45
#2
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,538
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
I think the Sharks window has closed. It's time time to start re-tooling IMO. Look at how quickly LA has built up their system, they will be relevant again soon.

Side note, why do NYR fans want to move Georgiev? Shesterkin is expansion exempt, NYR can run Shesterkin/Georgiev and have one of the leagues best tandems. Buy Lundqvist out, or try to trade him. If that fails hope he retires like Luongo did. It's sad it has to end this way but very few players get the fairy tale ending
8 juill. 2020 à 0 h 5
#3
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Sharks are rebuilding. Their chips already went in. They lost.
8 juill. 2020 à 1 h 36
#4
Démarrer sujet
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,521
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
Sharks decline? 2 top 35 picks? Seems like an easy no for them


Care to look who they got back? Or at least acknowledge what we are parting with?
8 juill. 2020 à 1 h 37
#5
Démarrer sujet
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,521
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: ItWasIn
I think the Sharks window has closed. It's time time to start re-tooling IMO. Look at how quickly LA has built up their system, they will be relevant again soon.

Side note, why do NYR fans want to move Georgiev? Shesterkin is expansion exempt, NYR can run Shesterkin/Georgiev and have one of the leagues best tandems. Buy Lundqvist out, or try to trade him. If that fails hope he retires like Luongo did. It's sad it has to end this way but very few players get the fairy tale ending

I agree and it sounds like what they are going to do but when you have a prospect like Tyler Wall who I can see being a starter in this league as your future potential backup, it would be ill-advised to not entertain offers for Georgiev.
8 juill. 2020 à 1 h 38
#6
Démarrer sujet
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,521
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Sharks are rebuilding. Their chips already went in. They lost.

Not gonna disagree on that but sounds like Doug Wilson isn't done yet and this roster looks pretty formidable to me.
8 juill. 2020 à 3 h 56
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Sharks are rebuilding. Their chips already went in. They lost.


They aren’t rebuilding though. Their chips are still in and from the looks of things, they intend to put in more.
8 juill. 2020 à 7 h 54
#8
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
They aren’t rebuilding though. Their chips are still in and from the looks of things, they intend to put in more.


That alone should get the GM fired.
8 juill. 2020 à 7 h 55
#9
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Not gonna disagree on that but sounds like Doug Wilson isn't done yet and this roster looks pretty formidable to me.


The problem is they spent huge on 3 old d men. They’ve all declined. What is it, like 26+ on 3 d men that aren’t that good anymore. That’s impossible to recover from.
8 juill. 2020 à 12 h 46
#10
D. Reedy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 173
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Care to look who they got back? Or at least acknowledge what we are parting with?


Depends on how much DW likes Strome and Geogriev. If Geogriev is actually going to be an NHL starting goalie and Strome isn't a one-hit wonder, then this is great for the Sharks. Maybe it's the Tampa 1st and Col's 2nd instead of the high SJ 2nd, but if those two players play to their potential then this is a great trade for us.

Two of the Sharks biggest needs are a good-skating, right-handed offensive catalyst and a new goalie. This trade should solve those. Sign me up.
8 juill. 2020 à 12 h 56
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: Bcarlo25
That alone should get the GM fired.


Not necessarily, but I agree it’s stupid.
8 juill. 2020 à 20 h 5
#12
Démarrer sujet
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,521
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: Bcarlo25
The problem is they spent huge on 3 old d men. They’ve all declined. What is it, like 26+ on 3 d men that aren’t that good anymore. That’s impossible to recover from.


DW doesn't wanna give a green light yet to a rebuild yet so idk.
8 juill. 2020 à 20 h 9
#13
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
DW doesn't wanna give a green light yet to a rebuild yet so idk.


Well, he’s very bad at his job then. I guess in fairness there’s not much he can really do. That franchise is sunk for 5 years. If i were him i would march into the GMs office, propose a 3 year tank to try to build a Pittsburgh.
8 juill. 2020 à 20 h 13
#14
Démarrer sujet
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,521
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Well, he’s very bad at his job then. I guess in fairness there’s not much he can really do. That franchise is sunk for 5 years. If i were him i would march into the GMs office, propose a 3 year tank to try to build a Pittsburgh.


Yeah I think if they moved their top pieces it could come relatively quickly too.
8 juill. 2020 à 20 h 13
#15
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Yeah I think if they moved their top pieces it could come relatively quickly too.


Like who?
8 juill. 2020 à 20 h 14
#16
Démarrer sujet
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,521
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Like who?


Hertl, Kane, Burns, and possibly Karlsson
8 juill. 2020 à 20 h 17
#17
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Hertl, Kane, Burns, and possibly Karlsson


Between Karlsson and Burns I don’t think they would get anything. I think they would likely have to retain just to move them.
8 juill. 2020 à 20 h 37
#18
Démarrer sujet
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,521
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Between Karlsson and Burns I don’t think they would get anything. I think they would likely have to retain just to move them.


They are in a tough spot
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage