SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Anaheim offseason

Créé par: eddyed24
Équipe: 2020-21 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 22 juin 2020
Publié: 7 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I've made previous moves for the teams that will miss this year tournament. Now I'm going to start with Anaheim.

First with the 6th overall pick I think they'll pick Raymond. He's not playing in Anaheim next season and it's better for him to play one more season in Europe before coming in North America.

From all the teams I've made so far Anaheim is the closest to being ready to compete. They got a excellent goaltender in Gibson. They got 3 defenseman who are top 4 (Fowler, Lindholm, Manson) and the top 6 is ok but I think it's enough to at least compete.

First I think the priority is to bring a rhd to complete the top 4. From the moment they trade him I think they made a mistake, so I think they should bring back Montour. Some might said for this type of defenseman I could sign Vatanen instead of making a trade, but I like Montour more because he's younger and better and because at LW Anaheim actually as Rakell, Jones, Comtois and Milano. The latter as actually enjoy a good time next to Getzlaf, but I think Comtois deserve to be a full time nhler and could replace him. But Montour for Milano is not enough so I add Larsson. He didn't have much chance to pass Lindholm or Fowler on the leftside so perhaps a change in Buffalo could help him as he prove he can at least play in the nhl as a top 6 defenseman, but perhaps with a bigger role he could be a top 4 in Buffalo and compete with McCabe. Djoos will replace him and in case of a injury Makura will be the first one to be called.

Now the big problem is the offense. They got players who are considered top 6 or have the potential to be, but they don't got any elite player. A game changer. Those players don't come cheap, but they could have one in Zegras. I think he needs one year with the Gulls so I wouldn't try to make a blockbuster move in order to bring that type of player as Anaheim is not ready to make those type of moves. Instead I think it will be a work by commitee.

I think next season they'll be better, but not good enough for the playoffs. Let's not forget their doing a rebuild on the fly as they still got a good mix of veteran and youngsters. Once Zegras and Raymond will come in the lineup this will be the Anaheim should spend more. Until they will rely heavily in Gibson and the top 4 in defense to win their games.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 250 000 $
11 750 000 $
21 500 000 $
44 500 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $66 747 166 $0 $132 500 $14 752 834 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
745 000 $745 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 juill. 2020 à 9 h 37
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
There's a reason why we traded Montour, GMBM hates him, plus he's just not a good top 4 guy, I'd much much much rather get a guy like Weegar

Zegras is ready, he won't be Elias Pettersson, but he'll be a solid 40-50 point guy next year in the middle 6 tbh (and if the season doesn't start till like Jan, Raymond is probably NHL ready)
7 juill. 2020 à 9 h 46
#2
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Dan10900
There's a reason why we traded Montour, GMBM hates him, plus he's just not a good top 4 guy, I'd much much much rather get a guy like Weegar

Zegras is ready, he won't be Elias Pettersson, but he'll be a solid 40-50 point guy next year in the middle 6 tbh (and if the season doesn't start till like Jan, Raymond is probably NHL ready)


Agreed on Montour. He was good for us, but mainly because he had a solid D-partner to make up for his questionable play. The holes in his game are made a lot more obvious in Buffalo, where they lack high end guys on the back end (Which is surprising, because they've got like 43 defencemen on the roster...). I like the idea of getting a guy like Weegar, and wouldn't even mind paying fair market value for someone like Cernak, but realize he'd be a tough get.
Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2020 à 9 h 50
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: Lenny7
Agreed on Montour. He was good for us, but mainly because he had a solid D-partner to make up for his questionable play. The holes in his game are made a lot more obvious in Buffalo, where they lack high end guys on the back end (Which is surprising, because they've got like 43 defencemen on the roster...). I like the idea of getting a guy like Weegar, and wouldn't even mind paying fair market value for someone like Cernak, but realize he'd be a tough get.


Yeah, Cernak would be another good one, assuming we want to keep Lindholm-Manson together, we should def target someone a bit more defensively minded than Montour to play with Fowler
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2020 à 10 h 16
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 383
Mentions "j'aime": 115
I've said Montour because he had good numbers with Anaheim. Of course he played with Lindholm a more defensif player but I would add a more offensif player to round up Anaheim top 4. I like mixing a offensif with a defensif player on defense.
7 juill. 2020 à 10 h 28
#5
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Dan10900
Yeah, Cernak would be another good one, assuming we want to keep Lindholm-Manson together, we should def target someone a bit more defensively minded than Montour to play with Fowler


Agreed. I wonder what Mahura could fetch. I really like him, and would love to see him actually log some ice time, but out of Larsson/Mahura/Djoos, IMO he's the only one that fetches something decent.
Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2020 à 10 h 39
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 2,709
Mentions "j'aime": 1,053
Sabres pass on this trade
7 juill. 2020 à 10 h 41
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: Lenny7
Agreed. I wonder what Mahura could fetch. I really like him, and would love to see him actually log some ice time, but out of Larsson/Mahura/Djoos, IMO he's the only one that fetches something decent.


Completely agree lol, love Mahura, would be sad to see him get traded, but he should get the biggest return if we were to trade any of the 500000 current bottom pair LHD we have
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2020 à 10 h 44
#8
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Dan10900
Completely agree lol, love Mahura, would be sad to see him get traded, but he should get the biggest return if we were to trade any of the 500000 current bottom pair LHD we have


tears of joy That's why I was surprised when they traded for Djoos. I get that Spronger is a nutjob, and was unfortunately never going to be a fit in Anaheim, but it would have been nice if GMBM had at least picked up some bag of bones that could play the right side...
Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2020 à 10 h 46
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: Lenny7
tears of joy That's why I was surprised when they traded for Djoos. I get that Spronger is a nutjob, and was unfortunately never going to be a fit in Anaheim, but it would have been nice if GMBM had at least picked up some bag of bones that could play the right side...


Supposedly Djoos can play the right side (per some caps fans who were trying to convince me how valuable he was before he got traded) but then again ever player can "play" RD according to fans of that team if he's rumored to be going to ANA (or TOR) lol
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2020 à 13 h 24
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 1,414
Mentions "j'aime": 389
I can’t see Murray trading for Monty. He hates him... also Milano did great with us I can’t see him getting moved either
7 juill. 2020 à 21 h 26
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Dan10900
Yeah, Cernak would be another good one, assuming we want to keep Lindholm-Manson together, we should def target someone a bit more defensively minded than Montour to play with Fowler


I've said it before, but the D-partner that Fowler really needs is an elite #1D. Someone like Pietrangelo would be perfect, but a prime Weber would have been best (more physical). Fowler is the epitome of a transition D-man and doesn't really excel on offence or defence. Therefore, to really shine, he needs someone who can make-up for those weaknesses in his game (which is why he's never been great with Lindholm because Lindholm is poor at generating offence too). Fowler can lead a 2nd pairing, but I believe his optimum role is as a complimentary partner to an elite talent on the top pairing. It won't happen, but:

Fowler - Pietrangelo
Lindholm - Manson
Djoos - Gudbranson

Would be a godly set of D pairings. Not to mention they'd have Gibson in net.
Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage