Islanders and Flames say no.

what in the living ****

Flames and Islanders probably say no but they really shouldn't if they look at the long game

TO says no to signing Hamonic (he's not very good or reliable)

I like that you realize you need to add to Nylander in a Tkachuk trade, but I just don't see the Flames moving Matty unless he asked for it.

Kerfoot is better thank Cizikas

Nylander is in the same tier as Tkachuk but Tkachuk is younger and gritter. adding a middle six winger and a 1st rounder makes it a no go for the leafs. I don't see why either team would trade those players (Willy and Tkachuk)

Also Engvall is fine, why dump good forward depth? if so you could at least get a 3rd/4th pick for him.

Leafs and Flames say no..

Value-wise its actually a great deal for the Flames, but Tkachuk is just way too important of a pplayer to Calgarys core and identity.