SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kings fans we want Sergachev

Créé par: ZiggyPalffy
Équipe: 2020-21 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 5 juill. 2020
Publié: 5 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
42 000 000 $
3825 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
1750 000 $
55 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
LAK
  1. Sergachev, Mikhail [Droits de RFA]
TBL
  1. Clague, Kale
  2. Kupari, Rasmus
Détails additionnels:
Rights to Carl Grundstrom.
2.
ARI
  1. Brickley, Daniel
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (LAK)
Rachats de contrats
Frais de résiliation
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de VGK
Logo de LAK
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de CGY
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2021
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de STL
Logo de LAK
Logo de TOR
Logo de LAK
Logo de CGY
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2022
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $72 898 864 $0 $2 732 500 $8 601 136 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
3 350 000 $3 350 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
C, AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 636 364 $2 636 364 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
G
UFA - 3
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
858 333 $858 333 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 juill. 2020 à 18 h 56
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Yeah no thanks from TB. I want something substantial for the guy, not mid-6 prospects.
KeepUps15 a aimé ceci.
5 juill. 2020 à 18 h 58
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
That seems like a very underwhelming return for TB
KeepUps15 a aimé ceci.
5 juill. 2020 à 18 h 58
#3
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: justaBoss
Yeah no thanks from TB. I want something substantial for the guy, not mid-6 prospects.


I'd say you are underestimating them. All of those prospects would do significantly better in the Lightning's system than they would in the Kings system. Plus Tampa Bay doesn't have the cap space for established players nor do they really need any. These are 3 B prospects and you can argue Kupari is an A prospect. That's 1 first round pick and 2 seconds.
5 juill. 2020 à 19 h 0
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Tampa should get better offers then that for Mikhail Sergachev, And for less then $5 million per. He's staying in Tampa.
5 juill. 2020 à 19 h 3
#5
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Tampa should get better offers then that for Mikhail Sergachev, And for less then $5 million per. He's staying in Tampa.


What can they get that is better that they can afford? Sure they sign him for 5.75M then. That wasn't the purpose of this ACGM, but as my #1 hater you love to nitpick the small stuff.
5 juill. 2020 à 19 h 7
#6
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Bf3351
I'd say you are underestimating them. All of those prospects would do significantly better in the Lightning's system than they would in the Kings system. Plus Tampa Bay doesn't have the cap space for established players nor do they really need any. These are 3 B prospects and you can argue Kupari is an A prospect. That's 1 first round pick and 2 seconds.


I wholeheartedly disagree.

Both Grundström and Clague aren't even that high prospects with former already turning 23 this year, while Clague's 22. Neither of them is even a NHL level player yet, while Sergachev is a great NHL defenseman and also younger than them...

Copper boy is an interesting prospect, but as a Finn I've followed the guy and I'm not that convinced, although this year he was riddled with injuries.

Overall this seems like a VERY underwhelming return for a great 22 year old NHL level D.
redw1n9s a aimé ceci.
5 juill. 2020 à 19 h 12
#7
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: justaBoss
I wholeheartedly disagree.

Both Grundström and Clague aren't even that high prospects with former already turning 23 this year, while Clague's 22. Neither of them is even a NHL level player yet, while Sergachev is a great NHL defenseman and also younger than them...

Copper boy is an interesting prospect, but as a Finn I've followed the guy and I'm not that convinced, although this year he was riddled with injuries.

Overall this seems like a VERY underwhelming return for a great 22 year old NHL level D.


Well if you looked at the other post I made specifically for Lightining fans input, I asked what they would add if they did not feel it was enough.
5 juill. 2020 à 19 h 18
#8
redw1n9s
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 1,911
Mentions "j'aime": 572
Quoting: Bf3351
I'd say you are underestimating them. All of those prospects would do significantly better in the Lightning's system than they would in the Kings system. Plus Tampa Bay doesn't have the cap space for established players nor do they really need any. These are 3 B prospects and you can argue Kupari is an A prospect. That's 1 first round pick and 2 seconds.


That's what you call a major assumption...Horrible value for Serg
5 juill. 2020 à 19 h 19
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Quoting: Bf3351
What can they get that is better that they can afford? Sure they sign him for 5.75M then. That wasn't the purpose of this ACGM, but as my #1 hater you love to nitpick the small stuff.


Yeah well i live in reality, And this is a fantasy site pure and simple. I live in Tampa and have been following this team for over 27 years now. And i know that's not enough. Like your offer sheets before on Sergachev were to low. If that's nitpicking so be it because he's not leaving low taxed Florida for high taxed California unless you're offering him something in the $7 million to $8 million per range. Tampa is still miles ahead of LA cup wise and i'm pretty sure Sergachev would rather be here in Tampa then LA.
5 juill. 2020 à 19 h 53
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 445
Mentions "j'aime": 72
New Jersey could make a counter offer to Tampa for like the 10th ovr pick (From Arizona if it's there) and Reilly Walsh a very solid defensive prospect at Harvard for Sergachev and a cap dump. I'm sure Tampa would much rather gain cap, a solid prospect, and the 10th pick for Sergachev in this case.
ZiggyPalffy a aimé ceci.
5 juill. 2020 à 20 h 13
#11
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Yeah well i live in reality, And this is a fantasy site pure and simple. I live in Tampa and have been following this team for over 27 years now. And i know that's not enough. Like your offer sheets before on Sergachev were to low. If that's nitpicking so be it because he's not leaving low taxed Florida for high taxed California unless you're offering him something in the $7 million to $8 million per range. Tampa is still miles ahead of LA cup wise and i'm pretty sure Sergachev would rather be here in Tampa then LA.


My offer sheets were always over 7M ****. You dont live in reality you live in know it all land. You are probably one of dumbest people on this site that thinks they're smart. What needs to be added since you know everything?
5 juill. 2020 à 20 h 15
#12
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: Devilsfan101
New Jersey could make a counter offer to Tampa for like the 10th ovr pick (From Arizona if it's there) and Reilly Walsh a very solid defensive prospect at Harvard for Sergachev and a cap dump. I'm sure Tampa would much rather gain cap, a solid prospect, and the 10th pick for Sergachev in this case.


Kings can do that too. I made another ACGM asking Tampa fans what needs to be added. Perhaps you should go there and tell me if you think this is not enough.
5 juill. 2020 à 20 h 15
#13
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: redw1n9s
That's what you call a major assumption...Horrible value for Serg


Not really.
5 juill. 2020 à 20 h 44
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,123
Mentions "j'aime": 246
Quoting: justaBoss
I wholeheartedly disagree.

Both Grundström and Clague aren't even that high prospects with former already turning 23 this year, while Clague's 22. Neither of them is even a NHL level player yet, while Sergachev is a great NHL defenseman and also younger than them...

Copper boy is an interesting prospect, but as a Finn I've followed the guy and I'm not that convinced, although this year he was riddled with injuries.

Overall this seems like a VERY underwhelming return for a great 22 year old NHL level D.



Grundstrom has at best middle six upside.
5 juill. 2020 à 21 h 6
#15
redw1n9s
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 1,911
Mentions "j'aime": 572
Quoting: Bf3351
Not really.


Uhhh, yes. Literally.
5 juill. 2020 à 21 h 8
#16
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: redw1n9s
Uhhh, yes. Literally.


You can argue Kings add, I could understand that, but it won't be much. I'd be happy to take Gourde from you assuming he'd waive for the way nicer LA.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage