SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Off-Season and 1st overall but Flat Cap

Créé par: Mark_Kelley
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 1 juill. 2020
Publié: 1 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
For the Off-season the Hawks should trade Saad, It will have more value for the Hawks instead of waiting for the deadline. I think they should somehow convince Seabrook to retire like what they did with Hossa and then give him a job in the front office. I think they should also look for replacement for the Blackhawks coach and I think the best Candidates are Gerard Gallant or Peter Laviolette. If the Hawks do win 1st overall they should play lafreniere on the first line with Toews and Kane so they can mentor him and one day hand the torch to him and Dach
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
11 200 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
55 200 000 $
14 200 000 $
31 900 000 $
34 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
23 200 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 500 000 $
2725 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Lafreniere, Alexis
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Saad, Brandon (1 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Seeler, Nick
Détails additionnels:
Saad Sign Extention
2.
CHI
  1. Brown, Connor [Droits de RFA]
OTT
  1. Määttä, Olli
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
3.
CHI
  1. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Liste de réserve]
EDM
  1. Krys, Chad
  2. Sikura, Dylan
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $70 615 373 $1 090 244 $4 282 500 $10 884 627 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Lafreniere, Alexis
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
C
UFA - 2
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 juill. 2020 à 17 h 29
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,884
Mentions "j'aime": 11,896
Connor Brown is far more valuable than Maatta, especially in Ottawa where LD is one of their deeper positions, and RW is their weakest.
exo2769 et TCMonkey a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2020 à 17 h 29
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Not a chance Ottawa or Edmonton take those trades. Way too one sided I’d have to think. The Pittsburgh is an interesting one and I do like ZAR.
1 juill. 2020 à 17 h 30
#3
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,536
Mentions "j'aime": 9,582
Quoting: HatterTParty
Not a chance Ottawa or Edmonton take those trades. Way too one sided I’d have to think. The Pittsburgh is an interesting one and I do like ZAR.


Stop it. Crow > Murray
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2020 à 17 h 31
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: exo2769
Stop it. Crow > Murray


Not gonna argue that one at the moment, but given Crawford’s eminent retirement in 2-3 years, when are the hawks gonna think about finding a replacement?
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2020 à 17 h 32
#5
Unbiased Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 373
Mentions "j'aime": 138
All teams reject your trades. If Seabrook retires, don't we still have to deal with his contract during the offseason? So with Shaw and Seabrook, we're actually around 10 mil over the cap. That's a fat cap penalty.
1 juill. 2020 à 17 h 33
#6
Démarrer sujet
VP, Amateur Scouting
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 209
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Connor Brown is far more valuable than Maatta, especially in Ottawa where LD is one of their deeper positions, and RW is their weakest.


Yea I messed up when making this, I will go back and fix it. but your right
1 juill. 2020 à 17 h 33
#7
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,536
Mentions "j'aime": 9,582
Quoting: HatterTParty
Not gonna argue that one at the moment, but given Crawford’s eminent retirement in 2-3 years, when are the hawks gonna think about finding a replacement?


Do they need to find it today? I don't think so. There are too many goalies out there that need to find homes before I trade assets away for a slumping one.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2020 à 17 h 35
#8
Démarrer sujet
VP, Amateur Scouting
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 209
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Quoting: exo2769
Stop it. Crow > Murray


The Problem is Crow is 35 and now is the time to find a replacement for him and when Matt Murray is on the Market, The Hawks need to explore all there options
1 juill. 2020 à 17 h 44
#9
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,536
Mentions "j'aime": 9,582
Quoting: Mark_Kelley
The Problem is Crow is 35 and now is the time to find a replacement for him and when Matt Murray is on the Market, The Hawks need to explore all there options


But we don't need to do it July 1st 2020. There are LOTs of options for us. Lehner and Crow are both UFAs. AND I personally think Matt Murray will be a UFA this summer. His trade value is low, but his arbitration value is high. PIT probably can't keep him so who's actually going to send PIT value? MAYBE only one of the teams that don't get Crow or Lehner. So why trade anything for him?

The honest truth is...we probably can't afford Murry and he'll only be on a 1 year deal. So if we trade for him and don't agree with the arbitrator...he's going to be a UFA and we just lost Saad for literally nothing...except the $1M we retained.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2020 à 17 h 57
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 828
Mentions "j'aime": 715
I would not trade Maatta and a 2nd for Brown. Brown has had one good season that was a direct result of a ton of ice time. He would not be playing 20 minutes a night on any other team. It’s not like 43 points in 71 games is even that crazy. Look at Dzingel if you want a sample of a successful middle six player coming out of Ottawa onto a new team.
1 juill. 2020 à 18 h 12
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: HatterTParty
Not gonna argue that one at the moment, but given Crawford’s eminent retirement in 2-3 years, when are the hawks gonna think about finding a replacement?


It ain't Murray who's proven highly inconsistent
1 juill. 2020 à 18 h 14
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: exo2769
But we don't need to do it July 1st 2020. There are LOTs of options for us. Lehner and Crow are both UFAs. AND I personally think Matt Murray will be a UFA this summer. His trade value is low, but his arbitration value is high. PIT probably can't keep him so who's actually going to send PIT value? MAYBE only one of the teams that don't get Crow or Lehner. So why trade anything for him?

The honest truth is...we probably can't afford Murry and he'll only be on a 1 year deal. So if we trade for him and don't agree with the arbitrator...he's going to be a UFA and we just lost Saad for literally nothing...except the $1M we retained.


Bingo thank you. No thanks to that PIT deal as such. Would much rather have Saad on this team and he likely will re-sign if Hawks agree not to expose him to the expansion draft. Otherwise, just move him at the TDL for a 1st plus a prospect.
1 juill. 2020 à 18 h 23
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 7,864
Mentions "j'aime": 4,120
Ya no thanks from Edmonton, would want more for Puljujarvi.
1 juill. 2020 à 18 h 27
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,188
Mentions "j'aime": 2,123
Quoting: ldubs572
All teams reject your trades. If Seabrook retires, don't we still have to deal with his contract during the offseason? So with Shaw and Seabrook, we're actually around 10 mil over the cap. That's a fat cap penalty.


I believe there are 2 choices for LTIR : putting them on it for the offseason, which kind of sets a hard cap of how much you can go above the cap during the regular season, so while you CAN do it, I think most teams try to avoid that, mainly for TDL purposes, and then the other one that most teams do of putting them on LTIR the 1st day of the season which gives you more flexibility.
1 juill. 2020 à 19 h 0
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,186
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
Your not a hawks fan are you? The lines are awful and every team declines your trades, seabrook isn't retiring (unfortunatly), and we aern't firing colliton after just recently giving him the job.
1 juill. 2020 à 19 h 29
#16
Unbiased Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 373
Mentions "j'aime": 138
Quoting: Wadejos123
Your not a hawks fan are you? The lines are awful and every team declines your trades, seabrook isn't retiring (unfortunatly), and we aern't firing colliton after just recently giving him the job.


Nah fire still Colliton
1 juill. 2020 à 20 h 51
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,186
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
Quoting: ldubs572
Nah fire still Colliton


not yet
2 juill. 2020 à 15 h 23
#18
Démarrer sujet
VP, Amateur Scouting
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 209
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Quoting: Wadejos123
not yet


Colliton has proven multiple times this year that he's not fit to be a NHL coach and since their good coaches on the market, the hawks should accept their mistake and move on. I feel if we don't fire Colliton it can hurt the development of Dach, Boqvist, Nylander, and Mitchell in future years
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage