SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Murray and R Strome

Créé par: DReedy14
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 1 juill. 2020
Publié: 1 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Is $5.5 mil over 4 years a good estimate for Strome and Murray's contracts?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1925 000 $
1925 000 $
1925 000 $
1925 000 $
1925 000 $
33 000 000 $
1900 000 $
45 500 000 $
45 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
1850 000 $
1850 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (FLA)
2.
SJS
PIT
  1. Émond, Zacharie
  2. Vlasic, Marc-Édouard (1 000 000 $ retained)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (COL)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (WSH)
3.
SJS
  1. Strome, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
NYR
  1. Gambrell, Dylan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (TBL)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de SJS
Logo de FLA
Logo de NYR
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYR
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $72 144 166 $0 $695 000 $9 355 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
836 667 $836 667 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 juill. 2020 à 12 h 18
#1
Connor
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,529
Mentions "j'aime": 635
Don't really know emond that well but I don't think the pens would be interested at all in vlasic, terrible contract especially if they're trading murray in that deal.
Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2020 à 12 h 19
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
This is a pretty decently fair trade for Strome.
1 juill. 2020 à 12 h 20
#3
PLD is a stud
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 534
Mentions "j'aime": 107
strome would fit in good
1 juill. 2020 à 12 h 22
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Pens get robbed blind
KakkoForMauriceRichardAward, Dan10900, justaBoss and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2020 à 12 h 23
#5
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Quoting: Sagecoll
This is a pretty decently fair trade for Strome.


Yup could you imagine if we ended up with 3 first rounder in this year's draft?
Nikolay_Zherdev et HOCKEYBOY448 a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2020 à 12 h 26
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Add in you're own 2020 first and the pens might consider... oh wait...
1 juill. 2020 à 12 h 31
#7
Démarrer sujet
D. Reedy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 173
Mentions "j'aime": 39
I don't know why so many fans on here are convinced Strome is getting traded but I'm all for it if he goes to the Sharks. Doug Wilson probably wants to trade the TB 1st for a new forward, and Strome is young, can skate, score and be a playmaker. He checks all the boxes and won't be as expensive as most other options.

With the Murray deal, I threw Edmond on there but that could be any goalie prospect (Shortridge, Korener, etc.). I'm figuring that fair for Pitt to take on the Vlasic contract and get a better player than Johnson who is on a shorter and cheaper but still bad deal.

The Penguins can't realistically keep Jarry and Murray, this way they get a goalie prospect and picks. They also get to upgrade from Johnson to Vlasic, which will cost them money, but again, more picks. Maybe the Sharks throw another prospect in or something.
1 juill. 2020 à 12 h 32
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
Yup could you imagine if we ended up with 3 first rounder in this year's draft?


I'd say we probably should have at least 3 1st rounders in this years draft.
1 juill. 2020 à 12 h 35
#9
Démarrer sujet
D. Reedy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 173
Mentions "j'aime": 39
I think the east coasters also don't really know that much about Vlasic. For a decade he was this underrated shutdown defenseman who no one knew because he played on the west coast and never put up points or made highlights. He was incredibly consistent and reliable. In the last two years, he hasn't been that, but he's not a bad defenseman. His contract is bad, but he's still a useful stay at home blueliner. From every single thing I've read about Jack Johnson, it sounds like he really sucks. Vlasic would be a definite upgrade and the Pens would get picks back in exchange for taking on the extra salary and years.
1 juill. 2020 à 12 h 39
#10
Démarrer sujet
D. Reedy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 173
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Quoting: Sagecoll
I'd say we probably should have at least 3 1st rounders in this years draft.


Y'all really should end up with three, because if you're trading Strome and Georgiev, those are both at least 2nds right? Maybe 1sts, particularly in this case.

Be wary though, Boston had three, back-to-back 1sts in 2015 (13-15) and got Debrusk but took two nobodies -- the next three picks were Barzal, Conner and Chabot.
1 juill. 2020 à 12 h 41
#11
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Quoting: Sagecoll
I'd say we probably should have at least 3 1st rounders in this years draft.


I hope you're not advocating for telling some of our players to f*** off just so we can get more picks are you?
1 juill. 2020 à 12 h 53
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 784
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Vlasic has a full NMC and by most reports, the only team he would even consider waiving it for would be Montreal (even that is unlikely). Even if he were to waive it, the Pens don't take that deal.
1 juill. 2020 à 12 h 54
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: DReedy14
Y'all really should end up with three, because if you're trading Strome and Georgiev, those are both at least 2nds right? Maybe 1sts, particularly in this case.

Be wary though, Boston had three, back-to-back 1sts in 2015 (13-15) and got Debrusk but took two nobodies -- the next three picks were Barzal, Conner and Chabot.


Rangers had 3 1sts 2 years ago....we did pretty good i'd say.
1 juill. 2020 à 12 h 55
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: DReedy14
I think the east coasters also don't really know that much about Vlasic. For a decade he was this underrated shutdown defenseman who no one knew because he played on the west coast and never put up points or made highlights. He was incredibly consistent and reliable. In the last two years, he hasn't been that, but he's not a bad defenseman. His contract is bad, but he's still a useful stay at home blueliner. From every single thing I've read about Jack Johnson, it sounds like he really sucks. Vlasic would be a definite upgrade and the Pens would get picks back in exchange for taking on the extra salary and years.


Vlasic is consistantly at the top of worst contract lists. Retain 50% and the Pens dont hang up. Otherwise it is a hard no.
1 juill. 2020 à 12 h 59
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
I hope you're not advocating for telling some of our players to f*** off just so we can get more picks are you?


I'm advocating for trading Strome and Trouba.... I think both of them get late 1sts (Trouba a bit more)
1 juill. 2020 à 15 h 0
#16
Knuckle Danz
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 311
Mentions "j'aime": 88
I'd like to offer an edited version of your Strome proposal.

SJ gets:
Strome, Howden, BUF '21 3rd and OTT '21 4th

NYR gets:
True, Gambrell, SJ '20 2nd

What the "fellow" NYR fans he won't tell you is that your proposal is an overpayment. Howden fits the current system much better than True; the depth of this draft affords both teams the means to move the deck chairs around. Strome can balance the lineup for the Sharks, while the two young centers fulfill the Rangers' alignment.

The Rangers focus in the draft will be on wing depth and right-handed shooting defense. Thus, NHL-ready centers for their bottom six, is the best return in a trade, if Strome isn't being dealt for a more significant return.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2020 à 17 h 35
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,214
Mentions "j'aime": 2,867
After giving it a lot of thought and seeing tons of Strome trades, I'm just gonna say I really don't want him. He's decent and had a bounce back year, but he's overhyped because most of his points came from guys like Panarin and Zibanejad, and he's inevitably going to get overpaid and end up a 30-40 point guy which (in my opinion) isn't worth giving up that first for. I just don't love him as a player, and personally wouldn't trade for him if asked to give up that much.
1 juill. 2020 à 17 h 58
#18
Démarrer sujet
D. Reedy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 173
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
After giving it a lot of thought and seeing tons of Strome trades, I'm just gonna say I really don't want him. He's decent and had a bounce back year, but he's overhyped because most of his points came from guys like Panarin and Zibanejad, and he's inevitably going to get overpaid and end up a 30-40 point guy which (in my opinion) isn't worth giving up that first for. I just don't love him as a player, and personally wouldn't trade for him if asked to give up that much.


But if he plays with Couture/Meier or Hertl/Kane maybe he can still provide high-level production. I just worry the Sharks won't be able to add a significant contributor who is right-handed, not old, and a good skater who won't cost more than $6 mil.

Who are some guys who you think the Sharks could get in the same price (salary and trade) range? Maybe Palmieri?
1 juill. 2020 à 18 h 0
#19
Démarrer sujet
D. Reedy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 173
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Quoting: YoucancallmeHockeyman
I'd like to offer an edited version of your Strome proposal.

SJ gets:
Strome, Howden, BUF '21 3rd and OTT '21 4th

NYR gets:
True, Gambrell, SJ '20 2nd

What the "fellow" NYR fans he won't tell you is that your proposal is an overpayment. Howden fits the current system much better than True; the depth of this draft affords both teams the means to move the deck chairs around. Strome can balance the lineup for the Sharks, while the two young centers fulfill the Rangers' alignment.

The Rangers focus in the draft will be on wing depth and right-handed shooting defense. Thus, NHL-ready centers for their bottom six, is the best return in a trade, if Strome isn't being dealt for a more significant return.


I don't know much about Howden, but I (not that my opinion matters to NHL GMs) am set on bringing in someone who can provide immediate offensive improvement at RW.
1 juill. 2020 à 22 h 14
#20
Knuckle Danz
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 311
Mentions "j'aime": 88
Quoting: DReedy14
I don't know much about Howden, but I (not that my opinion matters to NHL GMs) am set on bringing in someone who can provide immediate offensive improvement at RW.


I understand you totally. Sometimes it's difficult to figure out how to assess the prospects of a proposal, based on some of the quackery that arises here from time to time.

You are on to something wise. First round picks should be reserved for the NHL's big fish in trade proposals.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage