SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Would CHI reach this point of desperation

Créé par: Wqrrior
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 26 juin 2020
Publié: 30 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
34 450 000 $
24 000 000 $
1800 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Backes, David
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
6OA
ANA
  1. Seabrook, Brent
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
Let's assume CHI wins this draft... might they be so desperate?
2.
CHI
  1. Bennett, Sam
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
CGY
  1. Shaw, Andrew
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
BUF
  1. Koekkoek, Slater [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $69 561 931 $1 090 244 $5 132 500 $11 938 069 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 juin 2020 à 20 h 39
#1
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,539
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
Is Shaw ever going to play again?
30 juin 2020 à 20 h 39
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,269
Mentions "j'aime": 4,915
Quoting: ItWasIn
Is Shaw ever going to play again?


Probably not. So that trade doesn't make sense
ItWasIn et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2020 à 20 h 40
#3
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,831
Mentions "j'aime": 5,799
Hard no.
30 juin 2020 à 20 h 41
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,305
Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Hard no.


moving down 5 spots isn't worth pawning off the worst contract in hockey?
30 juin 2020 à 20 h 41
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 1,414
Mentions "j'aime": 389
If Chicago wins the draft the Ducks can throw in Rakell for good measures so you don’t get completely robbed
Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2020 à 20 h 41
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,269
Mentions "j'aime": 4,915
Hawk's will not get that desperate. We can afford to keep seabrook its not a problem at all. Would be like to move him? yes absolutly. But we aern't forced to. He wouldn't waive him NMC for anahiem anyways if at all. If we win Lafreniere, we 100% draft him. Stan shouldn't answer the phone regarding trade calls for 1st overall
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2020 à 20 h 41
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,269
Mentions "j'aime": 4,915
Quoting: Wqrrior
moving down 5 spots isn't worth pawning off the worst contract in hockey?


Not all all. Laf will be a superstar
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2020 à 20 h 43
#8
AllJonedOut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,463
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Quoting: Wqrrior
moving down 5 spots isn't worth pawning off the worst contract in hockey?


Vlasic is the worst contract. But this would be a good deal
30 juin 2020 à 20 h 46
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,600
Mentions "j'aime": 5,701
Hell no.
30 juin 2020 à 20 h 52
#10
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,593
Mentions "j'aime": 9,668
Quoting: Wqrrior
moving down 5 spots isn't worth pawning off the worst contract in hockey?


No. Especially a guy coming off double surgeries. He'll very likely end his career on LTIR. It's unfortunate, but true.
Wqrrior a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2020 à 20 h 53
#11
Dead inside
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 209
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Wqrrior
moving down 5 spots isn't worth pawning off the worst contract in hockey?


Rick DiPietro would like to have a word with you
LumberJacques a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2020 à 20 h 58
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,305
Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
Quoting: Ihaveajoner
Vlasic is the worst contract. But this would be a good deal


Seabrook is worse. Vlasic still is a top 4 defenseman and remains effective defensively. Seabrook is hardly an NHL player
30 juin 2020 à 20 h 58
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,305
Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
Quoting: TheGreatMistake
Rick DiPietro would like to have a word with you


currently playing.
30 juin 2020 à 20 h 58
#14
Kresco
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 171
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Why the hell would the flames do this?
30 juin 2020 à 21 h 2
#15
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,831
Mentions "j'aime": 5,799
Quoting: Wqrrior
moving down 5 spots isn't worth pawning off the worst contract in hockey?


If you are talking 10-15-16 you might be onto something. However, this is going down from 1-6and taking back Backes contract.

If we didn't need the immediate cap space, why would we downgrade so heavily? It's not like backes frees up any significant cap room for us.
30 juin 2020 à 21 h 5
#16
Dead inside
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 209
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Wqrrior
currently playing.


Still not the worst in history, but that's not exactly something to be happy about.
30 juin 2020 à 21 h 8
#17
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,593
Mentions "j'aime": 9,668
Quoting: Wqrrior
Seabrook is worse. Vlasic still is a top 4 defenseman and remains effective defensively. Seabrook is hardly an NHL player


You're a Canucks fan. What do you think of this article??? Dach for Seabrook and Podkolzin??? It didn't happen...AND it's a Hawks blog. I 100% get that. Just curious about your thoughts? 3-10...no contract back.

https://www.secondcityhockey.com/2019/6/24/18715505/vancouver-canucks-chicago-blackhawks-failed-trade-brent-seabrook-2019-nhl-draft
30 juin 2020 à 21 h 23
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,305
Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
Quoting: exo2769
You're a Canucks fan. What do you think of this article??? Dach for Seabrook and Podkolzin??? It didn't happen...AND it's a Hawks blog. I 100% get that. Just curious about your thoughts? 3-10...no contract back.

https://www.secondcityhockey.com/2019/6/24/18715505/vancouver-canucks-chicago-blackhawks-failed-trade-brent-seabrook-2019-nhl-draft


We had too many bad contracts to begin with. Half our team's cap would be cap dumps. The part that does it for me is Seabrook AND Loui would overlap the Petey and hughes contracts. I'm not losing one of those guys for this contract.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2020 à 21 h 38
#19
DaBus
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 1,404
Mentions "j'aime": 489
While I'd want to move Seabrook's deal, there are other players the Hawks can move to clear cap space. I do not think it is worth moving the #1 overall pick, especially when the Hawks are mediocre at best
30 juin 2020 à 21 h 49
#20
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Quoting: Arlotti47
If Chicago wins the draft the Ducks can throw in Rakell for good measures so you don’t get completely robbed


You spelled Steel wrong lol

CHI would probably have to add a pick in that case tho
30 juin 2020 à 21 h 52
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 1,414
Mentions "j'aime": 389
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
You spelled Steel wrong lol

CHI would probably have to add a pick in that case tho


Maybe Lundestrom
Wqrrior a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2020 à 23 h 11
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
The thing for Chicago is there are a lot of moving parts that can be dissected in our cap space. First and foremost, as most people talk about, Maatta and Smith have relatively cheap buyouts at 680k and 1.083 M respectively, and thats only if absolutely nobody wants them, and De Haan was still playing like a solid top 4 D-man this season before his injury, so Im sure somebody would bite on him as well. The next thing in the line is Toews, Kane, and Keith all expire on their contracts at the same time Debrincat and likely Strome if he takes a bridge deal too, so they would not be due for big raises until we get a bit of cap off the books, and the Seabs comes off the very next year. We are likely able to sign Crawford again, but it should not be for more than 2 seasons, as Dach, Boqvist, Mitchell, and Nylander would all come off their contracts a year or 2 before that point, so if we can get 2 of the 4 to take bridge deals for smaller cap, we should theoretically be in the clear. However, if Saad wants a raise, thats probably a no go and he might get traded at the deadline next year if we arent contending just to recoup some value and not let him walk for nothing. So like I said, lotta moving parts there, but its not unrealistic to say we dont have to pay a fortune to dump seabs
1 juill. 2020 à 0 h 11
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,989
Mentions "j'aime": 9,300
Quoting: Wqrrior
moving down 5 spots isn't worth pawning off the worst contract in hockey?


Nope, not a chance. Seabs can still play on the 3rd line, is one of the assistant captains and strongest locker room leaders for the team, can be bought out in 2 more seasons, and likely will work for the Hawks organization after playing. We aren't passing up on the closest prospect to McDavid since McDavid to move a contract we really don't need to move.

Kubalik won't get that much after 1 season. He likely signs in the mid $3's for 1 or 2 years.

Shaw is most likely done and on LITR. Smith will likely get bought out, De Haan or Maata will likely get moved. Hawks have the cap space to not have to pay to move Seabs....especially not for that price.
1 juill. 2020 à 0 h 24
#24
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,192
Mentions "j'aime": 9,012
Why are the Sabres trading a 4th for an AHLer when they can sign 1 for free
1 juill. 2020 à 1 h 16
#25
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,305
Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
Quoting: Shibbal18
Why are the Sabres trading a 4th for an AHLer when they can sign 1 for free


this guy is the perfect #6D on most teams. Not an AHLer
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage