SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The other side of AH96s burns trade

Créé par: papishark
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 28 juin 2020
Publié: 28 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This would be assuming Patrick actually plays, and doesnt sit out another year. I added a bit of retention to make it more realistic
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
12 500 000 $
43 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
33 500 000 $
33 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
PHI
  1. Burns, Brent (500 000 $ retained)
  2. Letunov, Maxim [Droits de RFA]
2.
TOR
  1. Roy, Jérémy [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $76 510 832 $0 $450 000 $4 989 168 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 juin 2020 à 10 h 42
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 327
Mentions "j'aime": 232
That would be a bad trade for Philly
KeepUps15 a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2020 à 10 h 47
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Bond007
That would be a bad trade for Philly


I personally wouldnt be so eager to give up on Patrick yet, but I do think Burns could boost their D core and fit well with them.
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2020 à 10 h 56
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 327
Mentions "j'aime": 232
Quoting: papishark
I personally wouldnt be so eager to give up on Patrick yet, but I do think Burns could boost their D core and fit well with them.


Burns is signed for next 5 years at 8M and he is already 35...his contract will soon be one of the worst in the NHL and his production will decline drastictly.
28 juin 2020 à 11 h 18
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,133
Mentions "j'aime": 14,147
You just cant help yourself.

Trade burns and then replace him with other terrible contracts for old dudes.
28 juin 2020 à 11 h 27
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Bond007
Burns is signed for next 5 years at 8M and he is already 35...his contract will soon be one of the worst in the NHL and his production will decline drastictly.


Not correct. Burns will be fine for 2-3 years
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2020 à 11 h 27
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
You just cant help yourself.

Trade burns and then replace him with other terrible contracts for old dudes.


Really? I dont see Shatten as a terrible contract, nor Khudobin
28 juin 2020 à 12 h 19
#7
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Quoting: papishark
Not correct. Burns will be fine for 2-3 years


Wrong he has shown signs of decline this year
28 juin 2020 à 12 h 34
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
Wrong he has shown signs of decline this year


Buddy, who do you think watched more Burns this year? Im willing to bet its me
Jexus a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2020 à 12 h 52
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,450
Mentions "j'aime": 576
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
Wrong he has shown signs of decline this year

He played 25 minutes a game and even on a heavily injured slumping team full of rookies he still put up 47 points outpacing Letang, Werenski, Karlsson and Heiskanen. So if this was a declining year you mustve been watching every game he played (like me) to notice little nuances in his game that would suggest a decline. And im sorry, but I dont believe you if you say you did.
papishark a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2020 à 13 h 1
#10
Pmwalker
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 944
Mentions "j'aime": 302
No interest in Burns. Good player.....contracts gonna be bad in a few seasons. Patrick we keep until we know what we have in him. Ghost can be had for the right offer.
28 juin 2020 à 13 h 23
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Pmwalker
No interest in Burns. Good player.....contracts gonna be bad in a few seasons. Patrick we keep until we know what we have in him. Ghost can be had for the right offer.


Fair enough. Ghost is the player we have the least interest in here. I like Patrick alot if he can play
28 juin 2020 à 14 h 10
#12
Pmwalker
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 944
Mentions "j'aime": 302
Quoting: papishark
Fair enough. Ghost is the player we have the least interest in here. I like Patrick alot if he can play


Ghosts demise has been overblown on these boards. He had a nagging injury that affected his mobility and confidence. He was healthy and gaining his confidence before the stoppage. He’s only 27 and has a good contract on top of it. The reason Ghost is considered tradeable is largely due to the expansion. Provorov, Sanheim and Myers are the obvious protected leaving Ghost exposed. That being said it’s preferred the return is ED draft exempt if it’s a defender.
28 juin 2020 à 14 h 27
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,123
Mentions "j'aime": 246
That Leafs trade is ok. Not great, not terrible. It's fair value for Johnsson but is Roy NHL ready?
28 juin 2020 à 15 h 33
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: EnvironmentalTwister
That Leafs trade is ok. Not great, not terrible. It's fair value for Johnsson but is Roy NHL ready?


Not quite lol

But he is a right shot Dman ya'll have been looking for. Problem is that I wouldn't expect to see him until a couple years down the road.
28 juin 2020 à 15 h 59
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: EnvironmentalTwister
That Leafs trade is ok. Not great, not terrible. It's fair value for Johnsson but is Roy NHL ready?


Probably not, but if your looking to salavage him, at one time he was considered to be pretty premier
28 juin 2020 à 16 h 47
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,123
Mentions "j'aime": 246
Quoting: papishark
Probably not, but if your looking to salavage him, at one time he was considered to be pretty premier



Thanks.
28 juin 2020 à 16 h 47
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,123
Mentions "j'aime": 246
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Not quite lol

But he is a right shot Dman ya'll have been looking for. Problem is that I wouldn't expect to see him until a couple years down the road.



Ugh. It's fair value but not what the Leafs need
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage