SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Just the Zuc trade

Créé par: Jexus
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 27 juin 2020
Publié: 27 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 500 000 $
1850 000 $
1950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 225 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $71 838 332 $0 $430 000 $9 661 668 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
3 225 000 $3 225 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
723 333 $723 333 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 juin 2020 à 23 h 30
#1
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
MIN doesn’t need G
dzmets a aimé ceci.
27 juin 2020 à 23 h 42
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,206
Mentions "j'aime": 3,641
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
MIN doesn’t need G


Well MN does need a G (they have some nice G prospects, yes), but they need a good G, not whatever Jones has been the last 2 seasons. I'd take my chances with Stalock, Dub, goalie KK over Jones (and his contract).

For the trade:
As much as I despise the Zucc contract I'd rather have him for $250k/year more over Jones.
TanSor et dzmets a aimé ceci.
27 juin 2020 à 23 h 55
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: wabit
Well MN does need a G (they have some nice G prospects, yes), but they need a good G, not whatever Jones has been the last 2 seasons. I'd take my chances with Stalock, Dub, goalie KK over Jones (and his contract).

For the trade:
As much as I despise the Zucc contract I'd rather have him for $250k/year more over Jones.


Maybe we could add something to make it worth it. We need the overpaid forward more than the goalie
TanSor a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2020 à 0 h 8
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
Quoting: papishark
Maybe we could add something to make it worth it. We need the overpaid forward more than the goalie


You interested in a pp specialist? James Neal might be available.
28 juin 2020 à 0 h 11
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Quoting: papishark
Maybe we could add something to make it worth it. We need the overpaid forward more than the goalie


Problem is the Sharks and Wild are sort of trying to do the same thing: rebuild on the fly. If the Sharks are willing to part with Hertl I'd love to try and swing a deal with Zucc and Jones involved (obviously we add), but I'd imagine Hertl is pretty close to untouchable.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2020 à 0 h 17
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,206
Mentions "j'aime": 3,641
Quoting: papishark
Maybe we could add something to make it worth it. We need the overpaid forward more than the goalie


Nobody needs that overpayed goalie, he doesn't even fall into the serviceable backup category. His contract is too long and for too much money. It's past the point taking a gamble and hoping he'll rebound after 2 very bad seasons.
28 juin 2020 à 0 h 37
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: TanSor
Problem is the Sharks and Wild are sort of trying to do the same thing: rebuild on the fly. If the Sharks are willing to part with Hertl I'd love to try and swing a deal with Zucc and Jones involved (obviously we add), but I'd imagine Hertl is pretty close to untouchable.


Pretty much yeah. Moving Hertl to be rid of Jones would be a colossal misstep and grounds for firing Doug Wilson. Hertl is someone I only move if we rebuild, and then Id want a top 10-20 prospect+ for him back
TanSor a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2020 à 0 h 38
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: wabit
Nobody needs that overpayed goalie, he doesn't even fall into the serviceable backup category. His contract is too long and for too much money. It's past the point taking a gamble and hoping he'll rebound after 2 very bad seasons.


I am well aware. Zuccarelo himself is a pretty awful and longer contract, which is the point of the trade
28 juin 2020 à 0 h 45
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,206
Mentions "j'aime": 3,641
Quoting: papishark
I am well aware. Zuccarelo himself is a pretty awful and longer contract, which is the point of the trade


Zucc at least adds to a team, not just eats up $6m in cap.
28 juin 2020 à 0 h 49
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: wabit
Zucc at least adds to a team, not just eats up $6m in cap.


Yeah but its longer and a bigger caphit. Your trading less time for less ability
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2020 à 1 h 15
#11
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 33,613
Mentions "j'aime": 20,845
Mini does not do this, they can buy out Dubnyk and sign Lehner.
28 juin 2020 à 1 h 41
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,450
Mentions "j'aime": 576
Quoting: papishark
Yeah but its longer and a bigger caphit. Your trading less time for less ability


Its mainly the NMC. Wild have to protect him, they dont protect Jones. Anyway many wild fans agreed with this trade earlier.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage