SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

ACCEPTABLE

Créé par: Claesson4Norris
Équipe: 2020-21 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 26 juin 2020
Publié: 26 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Stutzle, Tim
3925 000 $
Raymond, Lucas
3925 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYI
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de CBJ
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYI
Logo de OTT
Logo de WPG
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
2021
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de CBJ
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de COL
Logo de EDM
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2022
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1381 500 000 $37 504 167 $0 $2 500 000 $43 995 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Stutzle, Tim
925 000 $925 000 $
Raymond, Lucas
925 000 $925 000 $
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 8

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 juin 2020 à 20 h 29
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
wouldn't you take Drysdale with 5? Your RD is kinda thin
csick a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2020 à 20 h 29
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Congrats on the german and Drysdale
csick a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2020 à 20 h 31
#3
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,157
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
Quoting: Wqrrior
wouldn't you take Drysdale with 5? Your RD is kinda thin


nah Stutzle and Raymond. Hoping LA takes Stutzle but i will settle for him
26 juin 2020 à 20 h 31
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,450
Mentions "j'aime": 576
Still a damn fine draft coming for Ottawa. Id be upset if it were #1 as a Sharks fan but you guys are still getting amazing prospects and have a very bright future.
26 juin 2020 à 20 h 31
#5
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
I am actually ok with this.

Obviously wanted Laf... But will settle for a top 3
26 juin 2020 à 20 h 33
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: Wqrrior
wouldn't you take Drysdale with 5? Your RD is kinda thin


JBD/Zub/Thompson/Jaros, no top pair guy, but by no means thin, and weak enough to consider taking a worse player than Rossi/Raymond at 5
26 juin 2020 à 20 h 34
#7
GM CRIME DAWG
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 4,926
Mentions "j'aime": 2,687
OTT & BUFF just have no luck!
26 juin 2020 à 20 h 37
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Quoting: AFOX10900
JBD/Zub/Thompson/Jaros, no top pair guy, but by no means thin, and weak enough to consider taking a worse player than Rossi/Raymond at 5


Isn't jaros a likely #6/7 ? Zub is already older, hasn't played a game yet. JBD is unsigned and getting older, an offensive D yeah? Thompson is good, but not really to that extent?
26 juin 2020 à 20 h 38
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,884
Mentions "j'aime": 11,896
Quoting: Wqrrior
wouldn't you take Drysdale with 5? Your RD is kinda thin


It's not ideal, but Lassi Thomson and JBD both look like top 4 options, and Brannstrom prefers to play the right side.

In my opinion, the much bigger issue is the lack of elite forward talent. Brady is/will be that, and Norris and Batherson have the potential to be that, but I think they're in the tier just below elite. If they add en elite 1C like Stutzle and then a play driving winger who can play on the 2nd line, they'll be in a much better position than if they add Drysdale.
Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2020 à 20 h 40
#10
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,844
Mentions "j'aime": 8,548
HAHA
26 juin 2020 à 20 h 42
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: Wqrrior
Isn't jaros a likely #6/7 ? Zub is already older, hasn't played a game yet. JBD is unsigned and getting older, an offensive D yeah? Thompson is good, but not really to that extent?


Chabot-Thompson is not a terrible first pair, JBD can be top 4, Zub was probably the best Euro FA, before Lehtonen, can be a stopgap top 4 guy and really solid bottom pair guy, with Jaros as depth, not great, but again, not bad enough to consider taking a guy who's a clear tier below Raymond/Rossi to fix, especially when it's not like they have a star studded forward group, Tkachuk obv, Norris has potential, but behind that...? (well Stutzle/Raymond at 3)
26 juin 2020 à 20 h 48
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,884
Mentions "j'aime": 11,896
Quoting: McGruff
OTT & BUFF just have no luck!


I'm actually pretty happy with 3 and 5. I went in fully expecting 5 and 6.
McGruff a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2020 à 20 h 50
#13
GM CRIME DAWG
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 4,926
Mentions "j'aime": 2,687
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
I'm actually pretty happy with 3 and 5. I went in fully expecting 5 and 6.


You are an eternal optimist my friend - I like that...
Go Sens!!
Claesson4Norris a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2020 à 20 h 54
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,884
Mentions "j'aime": 11,896
Quoting: AFOX10900
Chabot-Thompson is not a terrible first pair, JBD can be top 4, Zub was probably the best Euro FA, before Lehtonen, can be a stopgap top 4 guy and really solid bottom pair guy, with Jaros as depth, not great, but again, not bad enough to consider taking a guy who's a clear tier below Raymond/Rossi to fix, especially when it's not like they have a star studded forward group, Tkachuk obv, Norris has potential, but behind that...? (well Stutzle/Raymond at 3)


I think JBD has top pair potential. I'm not a huge believer in his offensive production, but I think he's going to be an amazing defensive defenseman, and will be a great fit with Chabot.
Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2020 à 21 h 1
#15
habs_fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,932
Mentions "j'aime": 690
Quoting: csick
nah Stutzle and Raymond. Hoping LA takes Stutzle but i will settle for him


id rather have stutzle than byfield
26 juin 2020 à 21 h 5
#16
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,157
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
Quoting: habs_fan123
id rather have stutzle than byfield


People are really underrating Byfield imo, hes going to be lethal. Theyre both real good imo
26 juin 2020 à 21 h 36
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,884
Mentions "j'aime": 11,896
Quoting: csick
People are really underrating Byfield imo, hes going to be lethal. Theyre both real good imo


He's got a better pure toolkit, and he's still so young. He's got so much more Development to go. Stutzle be fantastic, but by the time Byfield is 22 I don't think it will even be a question who is better
csick a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2020 à 21 h 39
#18
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,157
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
He's got a better pure toolkit, and he's still so young. He's got so much more Development to go. Stutzle be fantastic, but by the time Byfield is 22 I don't think it will even be a question who is better


yes i put the odds at 65-35 that LA takes Stutzle over Byfield. We will take Byfield and one of Raymond, Drysdale. Perfetti or Sanderson as darkhorses
26 juin 2020 à 21 h 48
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,884
Mentions "j'aime": 11,896
Quoting: csick
yes i put the odds at 65-35 that LA takes Stutzle over Byfield. We will take Byfield and one of Raymond, Drysdale. Perfetti or Sanderson as darkhorses


Byfield + Raymond would be perfect.
csick a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2020 à 21 h 53
#20
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,157
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Byfield + Raymond would be perfect.


yup heres hoping thats like taking Matthews and Marner in 1 draft
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage