SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hanifin Strome

Créé par: Claesson4Norris
Équipe: 2020-21 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 17 juin 2020
Publié: 17 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Loosely based on a post Wqrrior made.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
65 250 000 $
53 975 000 $
23 750 000 $
31 250 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Strome, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
CHI
  1. Brown, Logan
  2. Wolanin, Christian
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (OTT)
2.
CGY
  1. Balcers, Rūdolfs [Droits de RFA]
  2. Tierney, Chris [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (DAL)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYI
Logo de SJS
Logo de CBJ
Logo de NYI
Logo de OTT
Logo de WPG
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
2021
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de CBJ
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de COL
Logo de EDM
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2022
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $59 414 166 $0 $4 802 500 $22 085 834 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 975 000 $3 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 juin 2020 à 16 h 12
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,992
Mentions "j'aime": 11,991
Thoughts @Wqrrior ?
17 juin 2020 à 16 h 13
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
At this point I would rather trade Strome for immediate help on defense rather than futures unless its an overpay in futures
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2020 à 16 h 14
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 590
Mentions "j'aime": 217
Dont need either of these players IMO. We have lots of young centers and Branstromm and Chabot both play the left side
17 juin 2020 à 16 h 17
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,992
Mentions "j'aime": 11,991
Quoting: SlickWilly
At this point I would rather trade Strome for immediate help on defense rather than futures unless its an overpay in futures


Wolanin IS immediate help on the blueline. He's been a top 4 option since he turned pro, but he's had some brutal luck so far. He got screwed by Guy Boucher in his rookie year, and he had a shoulder injury that kept him out this year.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2020 à 16 h 22
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 590
Mentions "j'aime": 217
After a second look I don't mind the Strome trade. Essentially giving up Wolannin and a second for an upgrade on Brown.

Still don't see the need for the Hannifin trade though
Claesson4Norris a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2020 à 16 h 23
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,992
Mentions "j'aime": 11,991
Quoting: sens2020
Dont need either of these players IMO. We have lots of young centers and Branstromm and Chabot both play the left side


If Ottawa misses out on a top C in the draft, I think they'd be well served to add an established top six C, and I think Strome would be a great option.

Hanifin is just building on idea I saw earlier. I like Hanifin as a 2LD, and Brannstrom is more comfortable playing on the right side. Provides more balance to the Defense, and gives Brannstrom an experienced partner who can legitimately play top 4.
sens2020 a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2020 à 16 h 26
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,310
Mentions "j'aime": 3,987
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Thoughts @Wqrrior ?


I'm not a fan of either team, but White would be the piece I think CGY would want over Tierney, although the two combined is ideal.

I do think Balcers is the type of prospect that is only valuable to OTT. Seems kinda like Motte on vancouver. I don't think anyone would really pay for Motte, but VAN values him highly... same with Balcers, who is overvalued by the organization and thus will stay there.

White, Wolanin/LaJoie and a 2nd would probably get it done.
17 juin 2020 à 16 h 27
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 2,088
Mentions "j'aime": 686
Flames might be losing Brodie, hamonic and Gustafsson this summer so I doubt Hanifin is being traded
Trickster a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2020 à 16 h 27
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Wolanin IS immediate help on the blueline. He's been a top 4 option since he turned pro, but he's had some brutal luck so far. He got screwed by Guy Boucher in his rookie year, and he had a shoulder injury that kept him out this year.


I mean, he's only played 45 games in the NHL. I'd rather land someone who's more proven. I'm not writing him off at all, as he could turn into a someone, but I just don't think he fits there yet
17 juin 2020 à 16 h 29
#10
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,629
Mentions "j'aime": 9,730
As a Hawks fan, I'm not super opposed to it, but there are some complications. The Hawks have a TON of Dmen right now. My last count was 10 that need ice time...I took Seeler out too... Not all of them are going to get it either and YES some of them can be sent to Rockford, but not all. Is Wolanin greater than Koekkoek? At this stage of the game, I don't really think so. I'd take him out and insert a different prospect even if the Hawks needed to add more...or send cap back, but that's easier said than done with Menlyk.

I keep bringing up Shane Pinto because he's about to see OTT draft (2) top 3 OA picks as forwards....in a system that's already stacked. I think he'll go 3 more years at UND and choose his own fate. Why not get value for him now?

What about Strome, Caggulia, and the CHI 4th....why Drake? Because he can help protect your 1st round pick investments while they develop.

For Brown, Pinto, and the OTT 2nd?
sens2020 a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2020 à 16 h 29
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 2,231
Mentions "j'aime": 401
I think Hanifin would be a great add to this team. Tons of experience, fits the age group they are building around.

But that deal doesn't bring back anything that CGY wants or needs right now. Monahan - Backlund - Ryan - Jankowski/Dube/Bennett/Quine up the middle without trading out their #3 dman. Tierney is probably close to a wash with Ryan for the Flames lineup. Ryan is better defensively.
sens2020 a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2020 à 16 h 29
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 748
Mentions "j'aime": 104
I can’t even begin to fathom that Calgary trade. Flames GM would have to be Peter Cerelli,

Sens would have to include and decent prospect with a ton of upside : either one of (Batherson, Formenton, Pinto, or Bernard Docker)
A 1st round pick ( sharks , islanders) and a 2nd round pick.
17 juin 2020 à 16 h 33
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 590
Mentions "j'aime": 217
Quoting: exo2769
As a Hawks fan, I'm not super opposed to it, but there are some complications. The Hawks have a TON of Dmen right now. My last count was 10 that need ice time...I took Seeler out too... Not all of them are going to get it either and YES some of them can be sent to Rockford, but not all. Is Wolanin greater than Koekkoek? At this stage of the game, I don't really think so. I'd take him out and insert a different prospect even if the Hawks needed to add more...or send cap back, but that's easier said than done with Menlyk.

I keep bringing up Shane Pinto because he's about to see OTT draft (2) top 3 OA picks as forwards....in a system that's already stacked. I think he'll go 3 more years at UND and choose his own fate. Why not get value for him now?

What about Strome, Caggulia, and the CHI 4th....why Drake? Because he can help protect your 1st round pick investments while they develop.

For Brown, Pinto, and the OTT 2nd?


I like your thoughts here defiantly interesting. The OTT 2nd is 33OA so they will be able to get a first round level player with it. Either swap it for a different second or upgrade the CHI pick to a second this or next year
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2020 à 16 h 47
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,283
Mentions "j'aime": 19,532
Not sure why Ottawa would want Hanifin but Calgary isn't moving him anyways, him and Andersson are their only defense with term atm
17 juin 2020 à 17 h 1
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,534
Mentions "j'aime": 1,238
I dont want to trade LBrown or the 33OA. I dont think the value there for Strome.

Im very cool with the CGY trade
17 juin 2020 à 17 h 32
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,026
Mentions "j'aime": 9,322
Wolanin offers no value to the Hawks, we have plenty of 2nd and 3rd line depth and prospects on defense.

Brown is okay, a bottom 6 role player.

For Strome you'll have to move the NYI pick plus Brown. If not the NYI pick then next year's 2021 1st round. Strome, who just turned 23, is a cost controlled 2C with plenty of upside. Hawks won't let him go for anything less then a mid 1st and role player or a late 1st and good prospect.
Wadejos123 et exo2769 a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2020 à 17 h 34
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,026
Mentions "j'aime": 9,322
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Wolanin IS immediate help on the blueline. He's been a top 4 option since he turned pro, but he's had some brutal luck so far. He got screwed by Guy Boucher in his rookie year, and he had a shoulder injury that kept him out this year.


Problem is on the left, we have Keith, De haan, Maatta, Koekko....plus prospects in Carlsson, Beuadin, Vlasic....we don't need bottom 4 help on either side (right side is even more loaded with better prospects). We need a #1 LHD but outside of that Wolanin isn't valuable.
17 juin 2020 à 17 h 48
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,280
Mentions "j'aime": 4,924
hawks decline
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2020 à 17 h 53
#19
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,050
Mentions "j'aime": 3,754
Hanifin is part of the future in Calgary, no dice.
18 juin 2020 à 9 h 46
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,682
Mentions "j'aime": 1,480
wow OTT get ripped off big time, Strome is not even a 2C, hes a 3C FFS, he is inconsistent, never scored more than 51 points in a season, that is a horribly bad trade for OTT.

i could see OTT looking into hanifin, considering Branny is being groomed to play RD right now but OTT had Wolanin and Lajoie and Boro for 2 spots...not a good show of confidence for Wolanin or lajoie that sens trade for another LD and mane sens fans here say Wolanin is a top 4 D....
sens2020 a aimé ceci.
18 juin 2020 à 9 h 47
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,682
Mentions "j'aime": 1,480
Quoting: ChiHawk
Wolanin offers no value to the Hawks, we have plenty of 2nd and 3rd line depth and prospects on defense.

Brown is okay, a bottom 6 role player.

For Strome you'll have to move the NYI pick plus Brown. If not the NYI pick then next year's 2021 1st round. Strome, who just turned 23, is a cost controlled 2C with plenty of upside. Hawks won't let him go for anything less then a mid 1st and role player or a late 1st and good prospect.


Strome is 3C, he is not worth any where neer a 1st round pick
sens2020 a aimé ceci.
18 juin 2020 à 10 h 29
#22
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,992
Mentions "j'aime": 11,991
Quoting: athrin
wow OTT get ripped off big time, Strome is not even a 2C, hes a 3C FFS, he is inconsistent, never scored more than 51 points in a season, that is a horribly bad trade for OTT.

i could see OTT looking into hanifin, considering Branny is being groomed to play RD right now but OTT had Wolanin and Lajoie and Boro for 2 spots...not a good show of confidence for Wolanin or lajoie that sens trade for another LD and mane sens fans here say Wolanin is a top 4 D....


Since leaving Arizona, Strome has been playing at a 20 goal, 60+ point pace. That's firmly 2C territory.

The idea with Hanifin trade would be that the Sens get a more established 2LD than Wolanin, which makes it easier for Brannstrom to find a top 4 RD spot. Sens wouldn't play Branny with Wolanin or Chabot, but the more defensively minded Hanifin makes more sense there. Trading Wolanin is tough, but Hanifin makes that loss palatable. I don't think Lajoie factors into any decision making for Ottawa. He's an AHL player at this point.
sens2020 et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
18 juin 2020 à 13 h 2
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,026
Mentions "j'aime": 9,322
Quoting: athrin
Strome is 3C, he is not worth any where neer a 1st round pick


LMAO that's funny.
18 juin 2020 à 16 h 44
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,682
Mentions "j'aime": 1,480
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Since leaving Arizona, Strome has been playing at a 20 goal, 60+ point pace. That's firmly 2C territory.

The idea with Hanifin trade would be that the Sens get a more established 2LD than Wolanin, which makes it easier for Brannstrom to find a top 4 RD spot. Sens wouldn't play Branny with Wolanin or Chabot, but the more defensively minded Hanifin makes more sense there. Trading Wolanin is tough, but Hanifin makes that loss palatable. I don't think Lajoie factors into any decision making for Ottawa. He's an AHL player at this point.


this season he dropped off big compared to the last one, 58 games with Chi in 2018-2019 he had 17g and 34A for 51 points, in 2019-2020 12g, 26A for 38 points on pace for 17g, 37A 54 points below average for a 2C, 1 season does not make a player or Dorion should sign Duclair to a 8x8 contract...... No way in hell is he worth 2 of OTT top prospects and 33OA. He regressed playing with better players this year than last year. How about OTT give Brown a chance before trading him.

i do not think the flames will trade Hanifin, Gio is 36 and not getting younger and hanifin is their 2nd best LD
sens2020 a aimé ceci.
18 juin 2020 à 16 h 45
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,682
Mentions "j'aime": 1,480
Quoting: ChiHawk
LMAO that's funny.


whats funny is you thinking Dylan is worth a 1st +, then you must thinkCirelli, Anthony,w ho is a better player must be worth 2 1st and 1-2 A prospects.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage