SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

New Top 4 RHD and 3C

Créé par: ThewsTML
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 16 juin 2020
Publié: 16 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
21 800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (WSH)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Two late 2nds
DET
  1. Dermott, Travis [Droits de RFA]
  2. Kerfoot, Alexander
Détails additionnels:
Two nice young pieces
2.
TOR
  1. Savard, David
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (CBJ)
Détails additionnels:
Good dependable Top 4 RHD, but almost 30
CBJ
  1. Johnsson, Andreas
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (WSH)
Détails additionnels:
Good middle-6 younger scorer to add to a goal-starved team, plus a nice late 2nd
3.
TOR
  1. Stephenson, Chandler [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
Détails additionnels:
RFA Rights to him. Good cheap 3C with good defensive metrics and just put almost 30 points up
VGK
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
Logo de CBJ
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de WPG
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $78 296 450 $0 $0 $3 203 550 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
737 500 $737 500 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 062 500 $1 062 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 juin 2020 à 16 h 22
#1
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 33,204
Mentions "j'aime": 20,733
K issues

1. Detroit is rebuilding so has no interest in losing picks. They may have an interest in dermott but thats a big maybe.
2. That does not get u Savard. Columbus would want a RHD coming back should they move him
3. Have no use for Chandler and we aint paying a 2nd for him pass.
aedoran et Viqsi a aimé ceci.
16 juin 2020 à 16 h 25
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,545
Mentions "j'aime": 7,343
that's a lot to pay for a guy who has been pretty sheltered and is already 26. Hope you arnt expecting much out of him as a 3C
16 juin 2020 à 16 h 36
#3
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,844
Mentions "j'aime": 5,309
Detroit passes, kerfoot is garbage and we aren't trading picks
16 juin 2020 à 16 h 58
#4
AM19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 398
Mentions "j'aime": 178
Quoting: aadoyle
K issues

1. Detroit is rebuilding so has no interest in losing picks. They may have an interest in dermott but thats a big maybe.
2. That does not get u Savard. Columbus would want a RHD coming back should they move him
3. Have no use for Chandler and we aint paying a 2nd for him pass.


On the Columbus front, not really. We have a ton of defencemen that are NHL-ready but we have a log-jam at D. I'm not opposed to this deal tbh.
ThewsTML a aimé ceci.
16 juin 2020 à 17 h 8
#5
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 33,204
Mentions "j'aime": 20,733
@AJP_18 @VIQSI do you think Specmence is correct or do you feel Savard should go if a RHD is coming back.
16 juin 2020 à 17 h 29
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 25
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: aadoyle
K issues

1. Detroit is rebuilding so has no interest in losing picks. They may have an interest in dermott but thats a big maybe.
2. That does not get u Savard. Columbus would want a RHD coming back should they move him
3. Have no use for Chandler and we aint paying a 2nd for him pass.


1. Doesn't have to be Detroit IMO, I used them almost as a placeholder. As long as you can get a 2nd for Dermott and a 2nd for Kerfoot, then everything else still works out. They're good, young players so I feel like there'd be a good market for them out there. I honestly want to keep Dermott but if we get a new Top 4 RHD, I don't see how we can afford to have him on our 3rd pair

2. I believe that's a pretty fair deal for Savard, since he's going on 30, they are stacked at D, but really lacking at forward. Adding a younger piece to the forward corps without subtracting from their top 3 defense is a nice get, seeing as they have guys (like Nuutivaara) who can step into that role

3. I'll agree that I may have overrated Stephenson. The trade is a 4th -> 2nd swap, not just giving away a 2nd, but he can probably be had for just a 4th considering Vegas will need to clear cap.
16 juin 2020 à 17 h 36
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 25
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: buffbry
Detroit passes, kerfoot is garbage and we aren't trading picks


"Kerfoot is garbage"? I get the opposition to trading picks, that's completely fair. I wrongly assumed the Wings were further along in their rebuild than they actually are. But Alexander Kerfoot is definitely worth a 2nd rounder on the open market
16 juin 2020 à 17 h 53
#8
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,462
Mentions "j'aime": 8,213
Quoting: ThewsTML
"Kerfoot is garbage"? I get the opposition to trading picks, that's completely fair. I wrongly assumed the Wings were further along in their rebuild than they actually are. But Alexander Kerfoot is definitely worth a 2nd rounder on the open market
I think it depends on the draft position a little bit. We get laf and then we're desperate for centers and kerfoot doesn't look like that bad an option . we get byfield or stutz then I think they pass on him. He isn't awesome but hes far from garbage
ThewsTML a aimé ceci.
16 juin 2020 à 18 h 42
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 839
Mentions "j'aime": 342
Just out of curiousity, how does a player that can only manage to score 3 even strength goals in over half a season while playing with elite line mates get labeled a "good middle 6 younger scorer"?
16 juin 2020 à 18 h 52
#10
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,844
Mentions "j'aime": 5,309
Quoting: ThewsTML
"Kerfoot is garbage"? I get the opposition to trading picks, that's completely fair. I wrongly assumed the Wings were further along in their rebuild than they actually are. But Alexander Kerfoot is definitely worth a 2nd rounder on the open market


I live in Colorado and saw him play, I woudo give up a 7th round pick for him, you can keep him. It's not about the value, it's about the fact that he stinks and I wouldn't give up any asset except for say frans Nielsen or justin abdelkator for him because they are both worse with worse contracts.

You are correct though, the wings aren't giving up those 2nds unless it was a young impact player or prospect
16 juin 2020 à 19 h 9
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,450
Mentions "j'aime": 2,962
Quoting: aadoyle
@AJP_18 @VIQSI do you think Specmence is correct or do you feel Savard should go if a RHD is coming back.

It's more that a top-6 center is needed, and Johnsson... kind of isn't. But that'd also be potentially worth considering.
Ajp_18 a aimé ceci.
16 juin 2020 à 20 h 10
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,851
Mentions "j'aime": 6,441
Quoting: aadoyle
@AJP_18 @VIQSI do you think Specmence is correct or do you feel Savard should go if a RHD is coming back.


I agree with Viqsi on that we need a top 6 center so the trade really doesn’t work. I’d prefer a 2nd pair RHD come in as Peeke was good in limited minutes but he was also sheltered this year. I think he will be a top 4 RHD to replace Savard, I’m not sure he’s ready for next year.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage