SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bruins potential playoff lines

Créé par: hanson493
Équipe: 2019-20 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 11 juin 2020
Publié: 11 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Ritchies playstyle fits how krejci likes to play. see horton and lucic from prior years. that could be a great combo even though i think ritchie is only really a 4th liner. pastrnak and kase could swap spots depending on scoring output. Debrusk and coyle have chemistry they both play fast and bjork fits well with coyle as well. i think they could potentially roll these lines out for the playoffs. can potentially see studnicka, senyshyn, kuhlman, frederic in place of people that get injured or arent performing.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2881 500 000 $79 325 592 $0 $3 270 000 $2 174 408 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 750 000 $$2M)
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance117 500 $$118K)
AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 juin 2020 à 13 h 18
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 1,063
Mentions "j'aime": 215
Yea Chara has a big impact in the playoffs
11 juin 2020 à 13 h 20
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
I guess my one question would be: do you really think they could swap Debrusk with Rtichie? Your reasoning makes sense and I would love to see them together, im just curious if it would happen ya know
11 juin 2020 à 13 h 49
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,617
Mentions "j'aime": 2,763
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
I guess my one question would be: do you really think they could swap Debrusk with Rtichie? Your reasoning makes sense and I would love to see them together, im just curious if it would happen ya know


I dont know if its that simple, it will come down to production. i see them going debrusk krejci kase as a 2nd line but ritchie takes nordstroms spot and someone like studnicka gets 3c where they move coyle to wing.
Silkysmooth42 a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2020 à 13 h 52
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,499
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Small sample size I know, but the trio of Ritchie-Krejci-Kase was just very underwhelming. I had posted what I'd like to see for lines (see below), but I'm gut says we'll see the same lines we had before the break, which is what you have here.

What I'd want to see...

Marchand - Bergeron - Pastrnak
DeBrusk - Krejci - Coyle
Bjork - Studnicka - Kase
Ritchie - Kuraly - Wagner
11 juin 2020 à 13 h 57
#5
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,547
Mentions "j'aime": 8,251
Quoting: ON3M4N
Small sample size I know, but the trio of Ritchie-Krejci-Kase was just very underwhelming. I had posted what I'd like to see for lines (see below), but I'm gut says we'll see the same lines we had before the break, which is what you have here.

What I'd want to see...

Marchand - Bergeron - Pastrnak
DeBrusk - Krejci - Coyle
Bjork - Studnicka - Kase
Ritchie - Kuraly - Wagner


I can't see then breaking in stud after such a long layoff. Plus coyle has been way more effective as a center than a wing. Next season though, id like those lines
bhavikp27 a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2020 à 14 h 11
#6
MMBzFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 1,111
Mentions "j'aime": 281
No issue with Lauzon, big fan, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Clifton were to play.
11 juin 2020 à 14 h 24
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,499
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Jfstompers
I can't see then breaking in stud after such a long layoff. Plus coyle has been way more effective as a center than a wing. Next season though, id like those lines


Kind of went over this a bit in my ACGM I did, but I don't see any issue with using Stud. He's had the same layoff that everyone else has, but he's also younger and should have an easier time getting is legs back. As for Coyle, I would agree he's a better center, but the advanced numbers w/ DeBrusk-Krejci-Coyle are very good in the limited time they had together. Again for me I wasn't impressed with the Ritchie-Krejci-Kase trio. While a small sample size, their metrics together were below average. I'd be looking to build a strong second line vs a below average 2nd line and above average 3rd line (Debrusk - Coyle - Bjork) from an analytics standpoint.
11 juin 2020 à 14 h 29
#8
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,063
Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
Ritchie on the 2nd line? More likely he’s on his second bag of popcorn watching the games from the press box. No chance.
11 juin 2020 à 14 h 48
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,573
Mentions "j'aime": 5,453
Coyle can be good with literally anyone.
I would still prefer DeBrusk with Krejci and Kase on the second line. Ideally, Ritchie on the 4th but no guarantee Studnicka/Senyshyn/Kuhlman can produce so LW3.

4th line, would like last year's line but they haven't been able to bring back that chemistry (yet), hopefully they will. Otherwise, Lindholm is reliable defensively, Blidh as well but not my first option and Kuhlman could be a good fit on the 4th line.

D/G perfect
12 juin 2020 à 8 h 51
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,617
Mentions "j'aime": 2,763
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Ritchie on the 2nd line? More likely he’s on his second bag of popcorn watching the games from the press box. No chance.


They were using ritchie on the 2nd line before this all stopped. if they put him on 3rd line you just have another useless line. As i said ideally hes a 4th liner. but i could see them doing this.
12 juin 2020 à 11 h 3
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
Quoting: ON3M4N
Small sample size I know, but the trio of Ritchie-Krejci-Kase was just very underwhelming. I had posted what I'd like to see for lines (see below), but I'm gut says we'll see the same lines we had before the break, which is what you have here.

What I'd want to see...

Marchand - Bergeron - Pastrnak
DeBrusk - Krejci - Coyle
Bjork - Studnicka - Kase
Ritchie - Kuraly - Wagner


Definitely like the idea of Studnicka in the mix, not sure how likely it is, but if they do i just think they probably keep Coyle with him whether thats on the wing or center. That Third line just seems like a defensive mess, at least if you have Coyle riding shotgun they can swap on faceoffs, assignments if Stud is falling behind. He's a really talented prospect but he's played 2 NHL games, and im not sure if sticking him on a line with a young winger and new addition is the best route for him. I do agree on the analytics and the top two lines are scary good if you go this route, i just think you end up having a third line that plays 8 minutes a night and doesnt really add anything in terms of matchups. But anything can happen, and if they do go with this idea it could very well surprise
12 juin 2020 à 14 h 17
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,499
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Heyhowareya37
Definitely like the idea of Studnicka in the mix, not sure how likely it is, but if they do i just think they probably keep Coyle with him whether thats on the wing or center. That Third line just seems like a defensive mess, at least if you have Coyle riding shotgun they can swap on faceoffs, assignments if Stud is falling behind. He's a really talented prospect but he's played 2 NHL games, and im not sure if sticking him on a line with a young winger and new addition is the best route for him. I do agree on the analytics and the top two lines are scary good if you go this route, i just think you end up having a third line that plays 8 minutes a night and doesnt really add anything in terms of matchups. But anything can happen, and if they do go with this idea it could very well surprise


Defensivley they should be ok. Studnicka was one of the most dangerous PK'ers in the AHL this season and Bjork is a 200ft players. It would make for a hell of a forchecking group actually. Aa for the trio, Studs and Bjork played together while Bjork was in Providence, so they are familiar with each other. Kase is a wild card, but w/ Coyle going to 2RW, Kase is the logical choice for 3RW. All three guys are good skaters that get in on the forcheck and are disruptive when teams try and breakout.
Heyhowareya37 a aimé ceci.
12 juin 2020 à 17 h 11
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
Quoting: ON3M4N
Defensivley they should be ok. Studnicka was one of the most dangerous PK'ers in the AHL this season and Bjork is a 200ft players. It would make for a hell of a forchecking group actually. Aa for the trio, Studs and Bjork played together while Bjork was in Providence, so they are familiar with each other. Kase is a wild card, but w/ Coyle going to 2RW, Kase is the logical choice for 3RW. All three guys are good skaters that get in on the forcheck and are disruptive when teams try and breakout.


Totally agree on most points, and understand that Stud was all situations guy. But i guess for me personally, I know 2 games isnt enough and it was early but during his NHL stint he didn't stand out a ton, and was moved to the wing in his second game. I just think having Coyle ride shotgun would cover up some mistakes. Regardless of the layoff, its still a jump and a learning curve. But i guess we'll be able to know until they get these guys out for training camp to see how far along they are physically/mentally. Who knows, Stud could show up and play his way into that role for sure. I would be thrilled if they could make that third line work.
12 juin 2020 à 17 h 46
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,724
Mentions "j'aime": 535
I think cassidy tried this experiment and it failed. That 2nd line didnt produce much before the pause, he needs to switch it up. My lines would be
march-berg-pasta
jd-krech-kase
ritch-coyle-bjork
blidh-kuraly-wags
12 juin 2020 à 18 h 35
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,499
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Heyhowareya37
Totally agree on most points, and understand that Stud was all situations guy. But i guess for me personally, I know 2 games isnt enough and it was early but during his NHL stint he didn't stand out a ton, and was moved to the wing in his second game. I just think having Coyle ride shotgun would cover up some mistakes. Regardless of the layoff, its still a jump and a learning curve. But i guess we'll be able to know until they get these guys out for training camp to see how far along they are physically/mentally. Who knows, Stud could show up and play his way into that role for sure. I would be thrilled if they could make that third line work.


I mean McAvoy stepped into the playoffs with zero experience and played 25+ a night. Talent rises to the occasion and its a 3rd line role of 12-13 minutes a night. Were not asking him to be a major contributor.

I don't think it happens, but its what id want to see. I fully expect the same lines we had before the break.
Heyhowareya37 a aimé ceci.
13 juin 2020 à 10 h 33
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,617
Mentions "j'aime": 2,763
Quoting: KennyBoi
I think cassidy tried this experiment and it failed. That 2nd line didnt produce much before the pause, he needs to switch it up. My lines would be
march-berg-pasta
jd-krech-kase
ritch-coyle-bjork
blidh-kuraly-wags


3rd line would be a nothing line. At that point drop ritchie to 4th line and put senyshyn or studnicka there.
13 juin 2020 à 22 h 6
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
Quoting: ON3M4N
I mean McAvoy stepped into the playoffs with zero experience and played 25+ a night. Talent rises to the occasion and its a 3rd line role of 12-13 minutes a night. Were not asking him to be a major contributor.

I don't think it happens, but its what id want to see. I fully expect the same lines we had before the break.


Sure, im with ya. But Mac also had Z riding with him, kind of what id like to see with Stud in terms of Coyle. But i think we agree on the fact, that Stud is a special young player for the bruins and it would be awesome if he can drive a line in the playoffs, the young legs would definitely help. And Lord knows Cassidy will mess with the lines anyways, so honestly if he does make the roster he will be shifted around a decent bit. But like you drew out, that second line with 74-46-13 would be a nightmare to play against!!
ON3M4N a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage