Is a really good team, but you'd be losing a very good player for nothing next year in the expansion draft. The rebuild is gonna be painful for this squad too.

Just because you stole us blind in the pettersson - sprong deal doesn't mean we're going to let you do it again.

I think Pens would offer incentive to Seattle to take Hornqvist, which would help us cap wise to sign rfa's. As for the rebuild, i don't see them even thinking of that as long as Sid and Geno are playing. Besides this team isn't old


I mean Anaheim is rebuilding so trading Rakell does make sense.. Poulin (our top prospect) and a 1st is a good return in my eyes. Tbh id be willing to go even further and add our 2nd best prospect in Filip Hallander as well.

You can add Poulin Hallander Legare Almeida Bellerive and Drozg and it really wouldn't matter for ANA, the LAST thing they need is more forward specs

Why is Rackell worth Poulin and a 1st? Hint, he's not.

Which "very" good player? McCann? Van Riemsdyk?

The point of the expansion draft is to have good players exposed. "Very" good? Not so much.

Oh, we're not objecting to trading Rakell -- we're objecting to the return. Our primary, and perhaps only, purpose in trading Rakell would be to obtain immediate help at RD. The one guy we're interested in -- John Marino -- I probably one of the few guys on your squad you're not really interested in trading. The problem is that you want to duplicate the Zucker trade, but you no longer have the pieces that got you there.

Rakell-yes
TVR-yes
Strome-no, no, no, no, no!!!