SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TDL_

Créé par: Wqrrior
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 4 juin 2020
Publié: 4 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 350 000 $
1925 000 $
1725 000 $
1775 000 $
1925 000 $
1925 000 $
2775 000 $
43 500 000 $
22 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
87 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
    CBO
    2.
    BOS
    1. Anderson, Josh [Droits de RFA]
    CBJ
    1. Kuhlman, Karson
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
    3.
    NSH
    1. Bjork, Anders
    2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    2021
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    2022
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $80 673 981 $964 222 $1 357 500 $826 019 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    C
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 350 000 $3 350 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
    AD, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 7
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 250 000 $$1M)
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    4 juin 2020 à 16 h 3
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 11,499
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
    Don't see the point behind the NSH trade to be honest. Rather just keep Bjork
    4 juin 2020 à 16 h 7
    #2
    CatmanVal
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2020
    Messages: 209
    Mentions "j'aime": 123
    Bruins reject both deals.

    Bjork is currently better than Jarnkrok and Kuhlman was better than Josh Andersson

    Bruins don’t CBO Moore, they will just trade him
    Silkysmooth42 a aimé ceci.
    4 juin 2020 à 16 h 11
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 10,305
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
    Quoting: CatmanV
    Bruins reject both deals.

    Bjork is currently better than Jarnkrok and Kuhlman was better than Josh Andersson

    Bruins don’t CBO Moore, they will just trade him



    Bruins won't be able to trade Moore in a flat cap league unless they pay a premium. This discussion has been had many times.

    Those players might have higher peaks (though I don't think Kuhlman is that good)... but if BOS is wanting a cup run, their chances are significantly higher after these deals.
    4 juin 2020 à 16 h 22
    #4
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 4,561
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
    Good RFA deals,
    Good UFA deals (but Krug might be 6 or 7 years)

    But the trades need work. Bruins arent ggiving up Two better players for two worse players.

    And bruins arent gonna buy out Moore when they can just trade him for a 6th or 7th

    Overall: Not Bad! But yeah those trades gotta go
    4 juin 2020 à 16 h 23
    #5
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 4,561
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
    Quoting: Wqrrior
    Bruins won't be able to trade Moore in a flat cap league unless they pay a premium. This discussion has been had many times.

    Those players might have higher peaks (though I don't think Kuhlman is that good)... but if BOS is wanting a cup run, their chances are significantly higher after these deals.


    Most people realize that Moore is a top 6 Dman and he is worth 2.75, in saying that, it is on the upper end of his player value which is why the bruins wont get anything back for him (hence the 7th and not a 3rd or 4th)
    4 juin 2020 à 16 h 30
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 27,641
    Mentions "j'aime": 14,426
    Quoting: CatmanV
    Bruins reject both deals.

    Bjork is currently better than Jarnkrok and Kuhlman was better than Josh Andersson

    Bruins don’t CBO Moore, they will just trade him


    Kuhlman is almost 25 and has 36 career games, 4 career goals. Anderson had a bad year but had 27 goals the year before and 63 total over the previous 3 years.

    you'd have to be the biggest homer in the world to make that argument.
    Wqrrior, Viqsi et KennyBoi a aimé ceci.
    4 juin 2020 à 16 h 58
    #7
    CatmanVal
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2020
    Messages: 209
    Mentions "j'aime": 123
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    Kuhlman is almost 25 and has 36 career games, 4 career goals. Anderson had a bad year but had 27 goals the year before and 63 total over the previous 3 years.

    you'd have to be the biggest homer in the world to make that argument.


    Considering I’m not a bruins fan, that is the dumbest thing I have ever heard.
    And that’s not rude, it’s just true
    4 juin 2020 à 18 h 19
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 12,573
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,453
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    Kuhlman is almost 25 and has 36 career games, 4 career goals. Anderson had a bad year but had 27 goals the year before and 63 total over the previous 3 years.

    you'd have to be the biggest homer in the world to make that argument.


    Anderson is better but the age argument is irrelevant as Kuhlman got his ELC 2 years ago and got called up last year. Also, he's more of a two-way player and points aren't everything.
    4 juin 2020 à 18 h 39
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 10,305
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
    Quoting: bhavikp27
    Anderson is better but the age argument is irrelevant as Kuhlman got his ELC 2 years ago and got called up last year. Also, he's more of a two-way player and points aren't everything.


    Having Kuhlman occupy a spot on a potential cup going team would be quite a weakness. It's a fairly small price to pay to solidify all four lines.
    ngikas a aimé ceci.
    4 juin 2020 à 19 h 47
    #10
    GM CRIME DAWG
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 4,940
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,691
    Quoting: Wqrrior
    Bruins won't be able to trade Moore in a flat cap league unless they pay a premium. This discussion has been had many times.
    Those players might have higher peaks (though I don't think Kuhlman is that good)... but if BOS is wanting a cup run, their chances are significantly higher after these deals.

    BJORK = no trade, thanks anyways.

    MOORE:
    * He's been chatted about many times yes - but anyone putting Moore as a "HOT topic of Discussion" is really just looking for things to do (Damn COVID!).
    * For BOS, he's practically irrelevant really.
    * The Bruins cap is not a problem in the first place. CBOs won't be a thing. Thus his US$2.75M is not either be it a flat, or falling world post COVID-19. They can keep on press-boxing him until injury or suspension say otherwise, he's added NHL-experience that is stuck in a D-depth issue (this sucks for him surely, but not the organization. He's played well when called upon so that's found-money really).
    * Lastly, he can be traded for pucks and water-bottles or even waived as a last resort and be a star in PROV.

    ANDERSON:
    * When healthy!!
    * Right now he is un-well (the dreaded concussion) and Vegas is for gambling after all, not the NHL...
    * JA, when healthy better not be a 4th liner...
    - pass -
    Wqrrior a aimé ceci.
    4 juin 2020 à 19 h 52
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 9,851
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,441
    That’s a no from Columbus. Anderson is worth a 2nd in an offersheet. We don’t have to and don’t want to trade him.
    Viqsi a aimé ceci.
    4 juin 2020 à 21 h 30
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 12,573
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,453
    Quoting: Wqrrior
    Having Kuhlman occupy a spot on a potential cup going team would be quite a weakness. It's a fairly small price to pay to solidify all four lines.


    Could be decent on the 4th line but due to the pause, couldn't see him there. Speedy forechecker and as I said, he is reliable a two-way player. 3RW, okay but RW2, then there's an issue.
    5 juin 2020 à 10 h 56
    #13
    MMBzFan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 1,111
    Mentions "j'aime": 281
    Yah the Bruins will give Bjork another year.

    There isn’t a Bruins CF team w/o a Moore trade.

    Still though like the trade creativity. Grizz/Krug debate goes on.
    5 juin 2020 à 20 h 0
    #14
    Bcarlo25
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 21,063
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
    Quoting: Wqrrior
    Bruins won't be able to trade Moore in a flat cap league unless they pay a premium. This discussion has been had many times.

    Those players might have higher peaks (though I don't think Kuhlman is that good)... but if BOS is wanting a cup run, their chances are significantly higher after these deals.


    The discussion has happened many times regarding Moore, but there’s never really been much of substance from the side that says the bruins need to pay a premium to rid themselves of Moore. I’m no Sweeney apologist, and I think a lot of the deals he’s signed are horrid, but this one isn’t.

    Whenever someone asks why Moore is so bad, the response is some version of, “because.”

    He’s a good player that got outplayed by a really good player in Matt Grzelcyk. His crime is being behind Krug, Grzelcyk, and Chara. There is a long long long list of NHL defensemen getting paid around what Moore is getting paid that wouldn’t be able to crack the lineup.
    KennyBoi a aimé ceci.
    6 juin 2020 à 1 h 45
    #15
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 10,305
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
    Quoting: Bcarlo25
    The discussion has happened many times regarding Moore, but there’s never really been much of substance from the side that says the bruins need to pay a premium to rid themselves of Moore. I’m no Sweeney apologist, and I think a lot of the deals he’s signed are horrid, but this one isn’t.

    Whenever someone asks why Moore is so bad, the response is some version of, “because.”

    He’s a good player that got outplayed by a really good player in Matt Grzelcyk. His crime is being behind Krug, Grzelcyk, and Chara. There is a long long long list of NHL defensemen getting paid around what Moore is getting paid that wouldn’t be able to crack the lineup.


    It's not that he is bad...

    it's that we are in a cap league... with a likely flat cap next year. And most teams are very close to said cap.

    Considering the massive amount of UFA defensemen, you can get an equivalent player for cheaper... or take a slight skill decrease to save a million in cap.

    He's definitely movable if the cap were to rise... but now that most every team is frantic about their cap picture, this isn't the guy you take your chances on... I don't see teams like COL, NJ or OTT buying into him either with their cap room. MAYBE florida. It's just unlikely... there's better options. Heck the Ducks might have two guys in Larsson and Guhle available for a fraction of the cap and they're about the same skill.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage